Active methodologies in remote lesson times: understanding the differences between public and private education in cities in the interior of Ceará
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i12.10922Keywords:
Teachers; Social isolation; Teaching; Remote teaching; Public and private education system; COVID-19.Abstract
Teachers are constantly faced with challenges related to the teaching methodology used in the classroom. Whether due to new technologies or new concepts, it is evident that teachers are reinventing themselves in an attempt to provide the best possible teaching experience to their students. This study addresses an even more challenging reality, that of carrying out all of this, however, in an environment outside the classroom. The social isolation caused by the pandemic of COVID-19 brought, abruptly, remote education to the center of attention, becoming the new reality. This article aimed to understand the differences in teaching between the public and private schools in cities in the interior of Ceará, being carried out through the application of interviews, in which the teachers' reports were collected. While in public education the main difficulty narrated was the application of tools, in private education the greatest difficulty was to adapt the content to the methodology. In this period of remote classes, it is not only essential to train education professionals, but mainly to give voice to teachers, since they are the real transforming agents of education.
References
Barbosa, E. F., & Moura, D. G. (2013). Metodologias ativas de aprendizagem na Educação Profissional e Tecnológica. Boletim Técnico do Senac, 39 (2), 48-67.
Barros, A. J. S., & Lehfeld, N. A. S. (2007). Fundamentos de metodologia científica. São Paulo, Brasil: Prentice Hall.
Berbel, N. A. N. (2011). As metodologias ativas e a promoção da autonomia dos estudantes. Semina: Ciências Sociais e Humanas, 32 (1), 25-40.
Bryman, A. (1989). Research methods and organization studies. Londres, England: Routledge.
Castro, C. M. (2006). A prática da pesquisa. São Paulo, Brasil: Pearson Universidades.
Diehl, A. A., & Tatim, D. C. (2004). Pesquisa em ciências sociais aplicadas: métodos e técnicas. São Paulo, Brasil: Pearson Universidades.
Erduran, S. (2020). Science Education in the Era of a Pandemic: How Can History, Philosophy and Sociology of Science Contribute to Education for Understanding and Solving the Covid-19 Crisis? Science and Education, 29, 233–235.
Ferreira, R., & Morosini, M. (2019). Metodologias ativas: as evidências da formação continuada de docentes no ensino superior. Revista Docência do Ensino Superior, 9, 1–19.
Freire, P. (1968). Pedagogia do Oprimido. São Paulo, Brasil: Paz & Guerra.
Deschamps, E. (2020). Sentimento e percepção dos professores brasileiros nos diferentes estágios do coronavírus no Brasil. Recuperado de https://institutopeninsula.org.br/pesquisa-sentimento-e-percepcao-dos-professores-nos-diferentes-estagios-do-coronavirus-no-brasil/
Lovato, F. L. et al. (2018). Metodologias Ativas de Aprendizagem: uma Breve Revisão. Acta Scientiae Canoas, 20 (2), 154-171.
Masetto, M. T. (2003). Competência Pedagógica do Professor Universitário. São Paulo, Brasil: Summus.
Miguel, P. A. C. et al. (2011). Metodologia de pesquisa em engenharia de produção e gestão de operações. Rio de Janeiro, Brasil: Elsevier.
Miranda, D. O.; Moreira, G. D. & Franco, R. A. S. R. (2020). O uso do software “kahoot!” como instrumento de avaliação formativa no ensino médio integrado. Research, Society and Development, 9 (11), 1-20.
Moreira, J. A. M., Henriques, S. & Barros, D. (2020). Transitando de um ensino remoto emergencial para uma educação digital em rede, em tempos de pandemia. Dialogia, 34, 351-364.
Oliveira, J. F. A. C., Fernandes, J. C. C. & Andrade, E. L. M. (2020). Educação no contexto da pandemia da Covid-19: adversidades e possibilidades. Intinerarius Reflectionis, 16 (1), 01-17.
Pereira, R. (2012). Método Ativo: Técnicas de Problematização da Realidade aplicada à Educação Básica e ao Ensino Superior. Anais do VI Colóquio Internacional “Educação e Contemporaneidade”, 1-15.
Pereira, A. S., et al. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. Santa Maria, Brasil: UAB/NTE/UFSM.
Rebelo, L. M. B., Aracaty e Silva, M. L., & Nascimento, A. P. M. (2020). O desafiante cenário educacional com a Covid-19: metodologias ativas e tecnologias digitais em debate. Pesquisa e Ensino, 1, e202039.
Ribeiro, J. T., Albuquerque, N. M. D. S., & Resende, T. I. M. (2020). Potencialidades e desafios da metodologia ativa na perspectiva dos graduandos de Medicina. Revista Docência do Ensino Superior, 10 (e019233),1-19.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Yago Neco Teixeira; Cícero Allan Barbosa Soares; Rômulo Pereira de Almeida; Luciana Melo de Medeiros Rolim Campos; André Ramos de Souza; Adriana de Alencar Gomes Pinheiro; Zuleide Fernandes de Queiroz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.