Main errors found in radiographs discarded in the school clinic of an institution of higher education

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i1.11689

Keywords:

Dentistry; Teaching; Dental radiography; Diagnostic errors; Quality control.

Abstract

The existence of faults, whether caused during exposure or in radiographic processing, results in inappropriate images that can interfere with the diagnosis and treatment of the patient. The purpose of this study is to provide information on the main types of errors made by dentistry students and the possible causes of these errors on periapical radiographs. It is a cross-sectional, observational study, with an inductive approach and a comparative, statistical and descriptive procedure. Data collection was performed based on the analysis of radiographs discarded by students due to radiographic errors that made their use unfeasible. The errors were categorized into radiographic technique errors and radiographic processing errors. In total, 114 radiographs were collected and analyzed by 3 dentists. The radiographic technique errors were the most found, corresponding to 81.58% of the total sample. The errors in radiographic processing were 18.42%. Among these, framing with tooth cuts was the most commonly found error (35.9%), followed by under-exposure (21.05%), over-exposure (14.04%) and vertical angle error (9.65%). In smaller percentages, partially revealed radiographs (6.14%), stained radiographs (5.26%), yellowish films (5.26%), appearance of a half moon (1.35%) and streaked (1.35%) were found ). It can be concluded that the main causes of these errors are the inadequate positioning of the patient and the X-ray apparatus, radiographs that have spent little or long time in contact with the processing solutions, improper handling of the film after processing, inappropriate storage, in addition to solutions with prolonged use time indicating chemical depletion.

References

Antunes, R. S. (2017). Resíduos de radiografias: Recolha e tratamento. 2017. 51 f. Dissertação (Mestrado) - Curso de Engenharia Química e Biológica, Centro de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa.

Braga, E. F. A., Silva, P. G., Oliveira, P. T. V., Júnior, J. P. F., & Marques, J. (2011). Comparação das imagens radiográficas digitais e convencionais em reaborções ósseas periodontais. Pesq Bras Odontoped Clin Integr, 11(4), 585-91.

Candeiro, G. T. D. M., Bringel, A. D. S. F., & Vale, I. S. D. (2009). Radiologia digital: Revisão de literatura. Rev. Odontol. Araçatuba (Online), 30(2), 38-44.

Carvalho, P. L., Neves, A. C. C., Medeiros, J. M. F., Zollner, N. A., Rosa, L. C. L., & Almeida E. T. D. C. (2009). Erros técnicos nas radiografias intrabucais realizadas por alunos de graduação. RGO, 57(2), 151-155.

Duarte, H. E. M., Araújo, C. C. M., & Sannomiya, E. K. (2008). Sistemas digitais na Radiologia Dento-Maxilo-Facial: uma nova fase na Odontologia? Revista Brasileira de Odontologia, 65(1), 42.

Haiter Neto F., & Melo D. P. (2010). Radiologia digital. Rev ABRO, 11(1), 5-17.

Iacopino A. (2007). The influence of “new science” on dental education: current concepts, trends, and models for the future. J Dent Educ., 71(4), 450-22.

Kreich, E. M., Queiroz, M. G. S., & Sloniak, M. C. (2002). Controle de qualidade em radiografias periapicais obtidas no curso de Odontologia da UEPG. Publicatio UEPG: Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, 8(1), 33-45.

Matheus, R. A., Montebelo Filho, A., Tanaka, E. E., & Barros, R. M. P. (2000). Avaliação no desempenho de acadêmicos durante tomadas radiográficas periapicais, pela técnica da bissetriz, realizadas na Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade Norte do Paraná (Unopar). Revista da Faculdade de Odontologia - UPF, 5(2), 25-29.

Melo, M. D. F. B., & Melo, S. L. S. (2008). Condições de radioproteção dos consultórios odontológicos. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 13, 2163-2170.

Pereira, A. S., Shitsuka, D. M., Parreira, F. J., & Shitsuka, R. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. Ed. UAB/NTE/UFSM.

Queiroga, M. A. S., Moreno, N. P. P., Figueiredo, C. B. O., & Brasileiro, C. B. (2010). Avaliação dos erros radiográficos cometidos por graduandos de odontologia em técnicas radiográficas intrabucais. Arquivos em Odontologia, 46(2), 61-65.

Silva, J. M. F., Oliveira, L. C., Daroz, B. G., Peyneau, P. D., Pereira, T. C. R., & Azevedo-Vaz, S. L. (2016). Erros cometidos por estudantes de Odontologia de uma universidade pública brasileira na realização de radiografias periapicais. Revista da ABENO, 16(1), 99-109.

Sisinno, C. L. S., & Moreira, J. C. (2005). Ecoeficiência: um instrumento para a redução da geração de resíduos e desperdícios em estabelecimentos de saúde. Cadernos de saúde pública, 21(6), 1893-1900.

Tosoni, G. M., Campos, D. M., & Silva, M. D. (2013). Frequência de cirurgiões-dentistas que realizam exame radiográfico intrabucal e avaliação das condições para a qualidade do exame. Revista de Odontologia da UNESP, 32(1), 25-29.

Tsesis, I., Kamburoglu, K., Katz, A., Tamse, A., Kaffe, I., & Kfir A. (2008). Comparison of digital with conventional radiography in detection of vertical root fractures in endodontically treated maxillary premolars: an ex vivo study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 106(1), 124-128.

Downloads

Published

09/01/2021

How to Cite

LIMA, F. de O.; GOMINHO, L. F.; PENHA, E. S. da; ALMEIDA, M. S. C.; TEODORO, M. K. R.; SANTOS, T. A. dos; ANDRADE, M. A.; SILVA, Q. P. da; SANTANA, M. T. P.; NOGUEIRA, P. L.; ARAÚJO, A. da S.; DANTAS, M. V. O. Main errors found in radiographs discarded in the school clinic of an institution of higher education. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 1, p. e23110111689, 2021. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v10i1.11689. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/11689. Acesso em: 16 nov. 2024.

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 1

Section

Health Sciences

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Filipe de Oliveira Lima; Luciana Ferraz Gominho; Elizandra Silva da Penha; Manuella Santos Carneiro Almeida; Maria Kaline Romero Teodoro; Thallita Alves dos Santos; Mateus Araújo Andrade; Quemuel Pereira da Silva; Maria Tays Pereira Santana; Paula Lima Nogueira; Amanda da Silva Araújo; Maria Vitória Oliveira Dantas

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.