Universal Design for Learning (DUA) and digital Technologies: breakig barriers promoting learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i1.12045Keywords:
Universal Design for Learning; Digital Technologies; Digital Media; Remote Teaching; COVID-19.Abstract
This study, which aims to reflect on teaching strategies based on Universal Design for Learning (DUA) articulated the use of digital technologies, in the context of the COVID Pandemic 19. Thus, it aimed to understand how the training processes and practices developed in the model remote, carried out in the 2020 academic period, to know how academics analyzed the practices implemented and implemented by teachers and to identify elements that signal for practices based on DUA articulated to the use of digital technologies. The research, which privileged the qualitative approach, was developed in the scope of a state public University of the State of Paraná and classes of the fourth year of the pedagogy degree course participated and the subject was composed of seventeen students. Data collection took place in the months of June and July 2020 and as a tool, a questionnaire containing five open questions was used, which were answered via Google Docs. The subjects' speeches were organized for analysis based on two themes, namely: remote teaching changes without changes: the limits experienced in practice and remote teaching and use of technologies: approximations with the principles of universal design for learning. It is concluded that technological resources and digital media assist the “being together” of the teacher with the student, helping their knowledge construction process and that digital media offer an immense range of possibilities, as long as they are linked to the principles of the DUA.
References
Axt, M., Fagundes, L. (1995) EAD – Curso de especialização via internet: buscando indicadores de qualidade. In: Congresso Internacional Logo, 7, Congresso de Informática Educativa do Mercosul, 1, 1995. Porto Alegre. p.120-31.
Bock, G.L.K., Gesser, M. & Nuernberg, A.H. (2018). Desenho Universal para a Aprendizagem: a Produção Científica no Período de 2011 a 2016. Rev. bras. educ. espec., Bauru, 24(1): 143-160. http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-65382018000100143&lng=pt&nrm=iso
Brito, G. S. (2006). Inclusão Digital do profissional professor: entendendo o conceito de tecnologia. In: 30º Encontro Anual ANPOCS, 2006. Anais do Encontro (GT24). Caxambu, MG, 2006. http://www.anpocs.com/index.php/encontros/papers/30-encontro-anual-da-anpocs/gt-26/gt24-14/3475-gbrito-inclusao/file
Bueno, N. L. (1999). O desafio da formação do educador para o ensino fundamental no contexto da educação tecnológica. 1999. Dissertação (Mestrado) - CEFET-PR, Curitiba.
Cervo, A. L. & Bervian, P. A. (2002). Metodologia científica: para uso dos estudantes universitários. 9. ed. São Paulo: MaKron Books.
Deckers, L. (2001). Motivation. biological, psychological and environmental. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Edyburn, D. L. (2010). Would you recognize Universal Design for Learning if you saw it? Ten propositions for new directions for the second decade of UDL. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33 (1): 33¬41.
Fagundes, L.C. (1996). Educação a distância em Ciência e tecnologia: o Projeto EducaDi/CNPq – 1997. Em Aberto, 16 (20): 134-140, abr./jun.
Fernández-Abascal, EG., Martín, MD. & Domínguez, J. (2001). Procesos psicológicos. Madrid: Editorial Pirámide.
Lüdke, M. & André, M. (2013) A pesquisa em educação: abordagens qualitativas. 2 ed. Rio de Janeiro: E.P.U.
Mendes, R. H. (2017). Uma educação orientada para diferenças. O Estado de S. Paulo, 24 nov. https://educacao.estadao.com.br/blogs/educacao-e-etc/%c2%aduma-educacao-orientada-para-as-diferencas/
Morin, E. (2004). Os sete saberes necessário para a educação do futuro. 9. ed. São Paulo: Cortez.
Moran, J. M. (2007). A educação que desejamos: novos desafios e como chegar lá. 2. ed. Campinas, SP: Papirus.
Movimento Down. (2015). Manual do desenho universal para aprendizagem. Desenho universal para livros didáticos: oficina brasileira. Rio de Janeiro. http://www.movimentodown.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Manual-FINAL-bibliografia.pdf
Palmero, F. (2005). Motivación: conducta y proceso. Revista electrónica de motivación y emoción, 8 (20-21): 1-26.
Pastor, C.A., Zubillaga, A. & Sánchez, J.M. (2015). Tecnologías y Diseño Universal para el Aprendizaje (DUA): experiencias en el contexto universitario e implicaciones en la formación del profesorado. RELATEC–Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa, 14 (1): 89-100.
Pastor, C.A. Sánchez Serrano, J.M.; Zubillaga del Río, A. (2018) Diseño Universal para el Aprendizaje (DUA): pautas para su introducción en el currículo. [Chile]. https://educrea.cl/diseno-universal-aprendizaje-dua-pautas-introduccion-curriculo/
Pereira, A. S. et al. (2018) Metodologia da pesquisa científica [recurso eletrônico]. Santa Maria, RS: UFSM, UAB/NTE/UFSM. 1 e-book https://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/handle/1/15824/Lic_Computacao_Metodologia-Pesquisa-Cientifica.pdf?sequence=1
Pereira, M.D. et al. (2020). Sofrimento emocional dos enfermeiros no contexto hospitalar frente à pandemia de COVID-19. Research, Society and Development, v. 9(8): e67985121.
Pinto, A. V. (2005). O conceito de tecnologia. 2. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Contraponto.
Prado, M. E. B. B.; Valente, J. A. A. (2002) Educação a distância possibilitando a formação do professor com base no ciclo da prática pedagógica. In: Moraes, M. C. Educação a distância: fundamentos e práticas. Campinas: Unicamp/NIED.
Rappolt-Schlichtmann, G. et al. (2013). Universal Design for Learning and elementary school ccience: exploring the efficacy, use, and perceptions of a web-based science notebook. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105 (4): 1210-1225 nov.
Richardson, R. J. (1999). Pesquisa social: métodos e técnicas. 3. ed. rev. ampl. São Paulo: Atlas.
Rose, D. H., Harbor, W. S., Johnston, C. S., Daley, S. G. & Abarbanell, L. (2006). Universal design for learning in postsecondary education: reflections on principles as their application. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 19 (2) 135-151.
Sampieri, R. H.; Collado, C. F. & Lucio, P. B. (1998). Metodologia de pesquisa. 3. ed. São Paulo: McGraw-Hill Interamericana do Brasil.
Sancho, J. M.; Hernándes, F. et al. (2006). Tecnologias para transformar a educação. Porto Alegre: Artmed,
Sanz, M.T., Menéndez, F.J. & Del Prado, M. (2019). Fundamentos teóricos y prácticos de la motivación. Madrid: Sanz y Torres.
Silva, M. (2000) Sala de aula interativa. Rio de Janeiro: Quartet.
Siqueira, M. A. da S. (2005) Monografias e teses: das normas técnicas ao projeto de pesquisa: teoria e prática. Brasília: Editora Consulex.
Wakefield, M. A. (2011). CAST (2011). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 2.0. https://udlguidelines.cast.org/more/downloads. Acesso em: dez. 2020.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Leociléa Aparecida Vieira; Roseneide Maria Batista Cirino
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
