Dependency theory and the role of educational economic organizations: reflexes in educational environments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i2.12391Keywords:
Educational Reform; Standardization of Teaching; Policy Makers; Think tanks.Abstract
The theoretical essay aims to present the role of Dependency Theory and its reflexes in the process of Brazilian socio-cultural construction. It also reflects on the role of educational economic organizations and their influence on Brazilian educational policy, as well as the actions of business reformers and the standardization of education. From a methodological point of view, this essay was constituted from a qualitative approach, produced through bibliographic research and documentary analysis. In order to give materiality to this theoretical essay, the following authors were privileged in the readings: Araújo and Frigotto (2015), Moura, Leite and Ribeiro (2015), Neves and Pronko (2008), Oriques (1995) among others. It is considered that, in the current moment of Brazilian educational policy, we have educational economic organizations that hide their real purposes of creation. They spread ideals to promote education for all, offered in a linear, stratified, statically created way, designed to serve specific audiences. The latent concern of major world banks to enter the educational market is viewed with great concern by parts of educational institutions and their teaching staff. The financing linked to the fulfillment of requirements, of goals to be achieved, reveal a trend of eminently ideological basis: servitude to the market.
References
Aprile, M. R., & Barone, R. E. M. (2009), “Educação Superior: Políticas Públicas para Inclusão Social”. Revista Ambiente Educação, 2(1), 39-55. https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&pid=S0011-5258201500030079100005&lng=en
Almeida, A. T. C de. (2014), “Determinantes dos Piores e Melhores Resultados Educacionais dos Alunos da Rede Pública de Ensino Fundamental no Brasil”. Planejamento e Políticas Públicas, (42), 147-187. https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&pid=S0011-5258201500030079100001&lng=en
Antunes, F. (2005). Globalização e europeização das políticas educativas: percursos, processos e metamorfose Globalização e europeização das políticas educativas: percursos, processos e metamorfoses. Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, Oeiras, (47), 125-143, jan. http://www.scielo.mec.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0873-65292005000100007&lng=pt&nrm=iso.
Araújo, R. M. de L., & Frigotto, G. (2015). Práticas pedagógicas e ensino integrado. Revista Educação em Questão, 52(38), 61-80.
Barbosa, J. R. (2016). Protestos da direita no Brasil contemporâneo: think tank, grupos empresariais, intelectuais e aparelhos orgânicos da burguesia. Lutas Sociais, 20(36), 151.
Carlotto, M. C. (2018). Inevitável e imprevisível, o fortalecimento da direita para além da dicotomia ação e estrutura: o espaço internacional como fonte de legitimação dos Think Tanks latino-americanos. PLURAL, 25(1), 63-91. https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:d3TAPIjjXekJ:https://www.revistas.usp.br/plural/article/download/149014/146177/+&cd=9&hl=pt-BR&ct=clnk&gl=br&client=ubuntu.
Gil, A. C. (2008). Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. (4a ed.), Atlas.
Hauck, J. C. R. (2017). What are 'Think Tanks'? Revisiting the Dilemma of the Definition. Brazilian Political Science Review, 11(2), e0006.
Machado, L. T. (1999). A teoria da dependência na América Latina. Estudos Avançados, 13(35), 199-215. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-40141999000100018.
Martins, C. E., & Filgueiras, L. (2018). A teoria marxista da dependência e os desafios do século XXI. Caderno CRH, 31(84), 445-449. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-49792018000300001
Mendes, V., & Peroni, V. (2020). Estado, mercado e formas de privatização: a influência dos think tanks na política educacional brasileira. Revista Espaço Pedagógico, 27(1), 65-88. http://seer.upf.br/index.php/rep/article/view/10575.
Moura, D. H., Leite, D., & Ribeiro, M. (2015). Politecnia e formação integrada: confrontos conceituais, projetos políticos e contradições históricas da educação brasileira. Revista brasileira de Educação, 20(63).
Neves, L. M. W., & Pronko, M. A. (2008). O mercado do conhecimento e o conhecimento para o mercado: da formação para o trabalho complexo no Brasil contemporâneo. EPSJV.
Oriques, N. D. (1995). La teoria marxista de la dependencia: una historia crítica. Tese de Doutorado. Universidade Autônoma do México. http://tede.ufsc.br/teses/MX0022-T.pdf.
Pereira, A. S., Shitsuka, D. M., Parreira, F. J., & Shitsuka, R.(2008). Metodologia da Pesquisa Científica. https://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/handle/1/15824/Lic_Computacao_Metodologia-Pesquisa-Cientifica.pdf?sequence=1
Rossetto, C. B. de S., & Gonçalves, F. de O. (2015). Equidade na Educação Superior no Brasil: Uma Análise Multinomial das Políticas Públicas de Acesso. Dados, 58(3), 791-824. https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/00115258201559.
Silva, V. G. da, & Pasqualli, R. (2020). A atualidade da pedagogia socialista soviética: um ensaio teórico. Research, Society and Development, 9(7). https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/4388.
Souza, Â. R., & Barbosa, A. G. (2011). Os trabalhadores docentes da educação básica no Brasil em uma leitura possível das políticas educacionais. Education Policy Analysis Archives/Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, 19, 1-22. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/2750/275019735035.pdf.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Fábio Lopes; Walquiria Guedert Mendes; Fernanda Corrêa Garcia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
