The use of simulation models for surgical training - integrative review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i2.12420Keywords:
Simulation-based surgical training; Maxillofacial surgery; Teaching.Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study is to carry out a integrative review on the use of models available on the market, addressing issues with existing studies, showing the various models available, also thinking about their efficiency and cost benefit. Methodology: A search of articles in the PubMed and Scielo databases was performed using the descriptors: simulation-based surgical training, maxillofacial and surgery, without restricting the language. Articles that did not present clarity in the methodology and that were not appropriate to the subject researched were excluded. Results: After reading the abstracts and applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, seven articles were selected for review. The studies proved the satisfactory efficiency of the described models. Final considerations: The models facilitate training in surgical techniques, which can later reduce the operation time and lead to a better execution of skills in reality.
References
Ahmed, N., et al (2018). Simulation-based training in maxillofacial surgery: are we going to be left behind? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg., 57(1):67-71.
Carvalho, F. S. R., et al (2018). Development of Education Material for oral and Maxillofacial Training. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg, 18(1):155-156.
Cohen, E. R., et al (2010). Cost savings from reduced catheter-related bloodstream infection after simulation-based education for residents in a medical intensive care unit.. Simulation in Healthcare, 5 (2), 98-102.
Ilburn, J. A., et al (2012). Introduction, availability and role of simulation in surgical education and training: Review of current evidence and recommenations from the Association of Surgeons in Training.Int J Surgery., 10(8):393-8.
Kolozsvari, N. O., et al (2011). Sim one, do one, teach one: considerations in designing training curricula for surgical simulation. Journal of Surgical Education, 68(5):421-7.
Kumaresan, R., et al (2013). An Inexpensive Suturing Training Model. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 13(4):609-11.
Lambrecht, J. T., et al (1990).Individual skull model fabrication for craniofacial surgery. Cleft Palate J., 27(4):382-5.
Lambrecht, J. T. H., et al (2010). Haptic model fabrication for undergraduate and postgraduate teaching. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 39(12): 1226-1229.
McCaslin, A. F., et al (2011). Enhancing the Utility of Surgical Simulation: From Proficiency to Automaticity. World Neurosurgery, 76(6):482-4.
O’Callaghan, J., et al (2017). Cross-sectional study of the financial cost of training to the surgical trainee in the UK and Ireland. BMJ Open, 7: e018086.
Pereira, A. S., et al. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. UFSM. https://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/handle/1/15824/Lic_Computacao_Metodologia-Pesquisa-Cientifica.pdf?sequence=1
Ploch, C. C., et al (2016). Using 3D Printing to Create Personalized Brain Models for Neurosurgical Training and Preoperative Planning. Neurosurg word, 90:668-674.
Schijven, M. P., et al (2005).SengThe Eindhoven laparoscopic cholecystectomy training course – improving operating room performance using virtual reality training: results from the first E.A.E.S. accredited virtual reality trainings curriculum. Surg Endosc., 19(9):1220-6.
Stefanidis, D., et al (2010).Initial laparoscopic basic skills training shortens the learning curve of laparoscopic suturing and is cost-effective. J Am Coll Surg., 210(4):436-40.
Uppal, N., et al (2011). Low-cost suturing trainging model for use in developing nations. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg., 50(1):e13-4.
Wanibuchi, H., et al (2016). Training for Skull Base Surgery with a Colored Temporal Bone Model Created by Three-Dimensional Printing Technology. World Neurosurg, 91:66-72.
Wen, G., et al (2016). A practical 3D printed simulator for endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery to improve basic operational skills. Childs Nerv Syst., 32(6):1109-16.
Werz, S. M., et al (2018). 3D Printed Surgical Simulation Models as education tool by maxillofacial surgeons. Eur J Dent Educ., 22(3):e500-e505.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Nathalia Elen Barbosa dos Santos; Eduardo Brito de Lima; Marina Araújo Sales; Andrê Parente de Sá Barreto Vieira; Radamés Bezerra Melo; Carlos Diego Lopes Sá
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
