Prospective radiographic evaluation of peri-implant bone maintenance on osseointegrated implants with frictional morse taper connection and platform switching: Cases report
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i2.12467Keywords:
Dentistry; Dental implants; Osseointegration.Abstract
Objective: The aim of the present study was to evaluate radiographically the remodeling of the peri-implant bone crest in prosthetic friction morse cone implants, with platform switching, after 12 months of application of prosthetic load. Materials and Methods: 16 implants were installed, in 10 patients, rehabilitated with partial, single and multiple metal-ceramic prostheses, submitted to prosthetic function in the period of 12 months. Periapical radiographs to measure the distance between the mesial and distal marginal bone crest and the platform of each implant, were performed at the time of installing the prostheses and 12 months later. The images obtained at different intervals were digitized and analyzed using Image J software TD. Results: At the time of installing the prostheses, the averages of measurements on the distal and mesial surfaces were 0.57 mm (standard deviation 0.45) and 0.55 mm (standard deviation 0.41) respectively. After 12 months in function, the averages obtained were 0.59 mm (standard deviation 0.48) on the distal surface and 0.57 mm on the mesial surface, (standard deviation 0.34). Conclusion: In this radiographic evaluation, it was possible to observe that the implants with prosthetic connection of the frictional Cone Morse type with platform switching presented an average of 0.2mm of cervical bone remodeling, after 12 months in function, seeming to be a good alternative for periodic bone maintenance deploy.
References
Albrektsson, T., Zarb, G., Worthington, P., & Eriksson, A. R. (1986). The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int j oral maxillofac im-plants, 1(1), 11-25.
Branemark, P. I. (1985). Introduction to osseointegration. Tissue-integrated prostheses, 11-76.
Covani, U., Bortolaia, C., Barone, A., & Sbordone, L. (2004). Bucco‐lingual crestal bone changes after immediate and delayed implant placement. Journal of Periodontology, 75(12), 1605-1612.
Covani, U., Cornelini, R., & Barone, A. (2003). Bucco‐lingual bone remodeling around implants placed into immediate extraction sockets: A case series. Journal of Periodontology, 74(2), 268-273.
Fickl, S., Zuhr, O., Stein, J. M., & Hürzeler, M. B. (2010). Peri-implant bone level around implants with platform-switched abutments. The International journal of oral & maxillofacial im-plants, 25(3), 577.
Juodzbalys, G. (2003). Instrument for extraction socket measurement in immediate implant installa-tion. Clinical oral implants research, 14(2), 144-149.
Kutan-Misirlioglu, E., Bolukbasi, N., Yildirim-Ondur, E., & Ozdemir, T. (2014). Clinical and Ra-diographic Evaluation of Marginal Bone Changes around Platform-Switching Implants Placed in Crestal or Subcrestal Positions: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research.
Palacios-Garzón, N., Velasco-Ortega, E., & López-López, J. (2019). Bone loss in implants placed at subcrestal and crestal level: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Materials, 12(1), 154.
Paolantonio, M., Dolci, M., Scarano, A., d'Archivio, D., Di Placido, G., Tumini, V., & Piattelli, A. (2001). Immediate implantation in fresh extraction sockets. A controlled clinical and histological study in man. Journal of periodontology, 72(11), 1560-1571.
Schropp, L., Kostopoulos, L., Wenzel, A., & Isidor, F. (2005). Clinical and radiographic perfor-mance of delayed‐immediate single‐tooth implant placement associated with peri‐implant bone de-fects. A 2‐year prospective, controlled, randomized follow‐up report. Journal of Clinical Periodon-tology, 32(5), 480-487.
Schropp, L., Wenzel, A., Kostopoulos, L., & Karring, T. (2003). Bone healing and soft tissue con-tour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 23(4).
Silva, R. M. M. da, Rolim, A. K. A., Delgado, L. A., Sousa, J. T., Ribeiro, R. A., Rodrigues, R. de Q. F., & Rodrigues, R. A. (2020). Cone morse x external hexagon, advantages and disadvantages in the clinical aspect: literature review. Research, Society and Development, 9(7), e454973947. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i7.3947
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Eduardo Cekaunaskas Kalil; Elaine Marcílio Santos; Alexandre Melloti Dottore; Sergio de Sousa Sobral; Ana Paula Taboada Sobral; Kristianne Porta Santos Fernandes; Lara Jansiski Motta; Anna Carolina Ratto Tempestini Horliana; Andréa Oliver Gomes; Sandra Kalil Bussadori
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
