Photoanthropometry as a method of facial analysis for forensic age estimation: a systematic review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i2.12469Keywords:
Review; Forensic Dentistry; Age Groups; Face; Photography.Abstract
The exponential growth of Internet crime, such as pedophilia, often requires estimating age from the facial images of the individuals involved. The objective of this study was to evaluate the applicability of the photoanthropometric method for estimating age with forensic purposes by means of a systematic review. We searched the databases PUBMED, SCOPUS, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, LILACS, CAPES and SIGLE, using MeSH and free terms based on PICO strategy (P: population, I: intervention, C: comparison, and O: outcome). We included studies that evaluated images of individuals by photoanthropology to estimate forensic age. Data extraction and methodological quality evaluation were performed (QUADAS-2). Of 2809 articles identified, 37 were initially selected for addressing facial analysis through photoanthropology. After reading in full, 9 studies that used the method for age estimation remained. With a sample from 9 different nationalities, 5 articles had their photoanthropometric markings done manually, while 4 were automated. All studies had age groupings for their determination, and there were no coincidences between them. The method of photoanthropometry was considered effective for age estimation in 5 articles, while 4 reported that more studies are needed to minimize errors. Only 3 studies had low risk of bias because they used an applicable and reliable reference standard. Photoanthropometry has limited applicability in the forensic age estimation, and there is questionable evidence that supports its use due to the risks of bias present in the studies.
References
Akdeniz, Y. (2016). Internet child pornography and the law: National and international responses. Routledge.
Becker, M., Svensson, H., & Jacobsson, S. (1998). Clinical examination compared with morphometry of digital photographs for evaluation of repaired cleft lips. Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery, 32(3), 301–306.
Bednarek, J. (2006). [Problems associated with chronological age estimation of children exploited in child pornography production]. Archiwum medycyny sadowej i kryminologii, 56(3), 149–154.
Borges, D. L., Vidal, F. B., Flores, M. R. P., Melani, R. F. H., Guimaraes, M. A., & Machado, C. E. P. (2018). Photoanthropometric face iridial proportions for age estimation: An investigation using features selected via a joint mutual information criterion. Forensic Science International, 284, 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.12.011
Cattaneo, C., Obertova, Z., Ratnayake, M., Marasciuolo, L., Tutkuviene, J., Poppa, P., Gibelli, D., Gabriel, P., & Ritz-Timme, S. (2012). Can facial proportions taken from images be of use for ageing in cases of suspected child pornography? A pilot study. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 126(1), 139–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-011-0564-7
Cattaneo, C., Ritz-Timme, S., Gabriel, P., Gibelli, D., Giudici, E., Poppa, P., Nohrden, D., Assmann, S., Schmitt, R., & Grandi, M. (2009). The difficult issue of age assessment on pedo-pornographic material. Forensic science international, 183(1–3), e21–e24.
Cummaudo, M., Guerzoni, M., Gibelli, D., Cigada, A., Obertova, Z., Ratnayake, M., Poppa, P., Gabriel, P., Ritz-Timme, S., & Cattaneo, C. (2014). Towards a method for determining age ranges from faces of juveniles on photographs. Forensic Science International, 239, 107.e1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.01.021
Davis, J. P., Valentine, T., & Davis, R. E. (2010). Computer assisted photo-anthropometric analyses of full-face and profile facial images. Forensic science international, 200(1–3), 165–176.
Driessen, J. P., Vuyk, H., & Borgstein, J. (2011). New insights into facial anthropometry in digital photographs using iris dependent calibration. International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology, 75(4), 579–584.
FISWG. (2012). Guidelines for facial comparison methods. Facial Identification Scientific Working Group.
Galvánek, M., Furmanová, K., Chalás, I., & Sochor, J. (2015). Automated facial landmark detection, comparison and visualization. Proceedings of the 31st spring conference on computer graphics, 7–14.
Gehlen, S., Broker, H. M., Ritz-Timme, S., Tuktuviene, J., & Cattaneo, C. (2005). Child pornography: Development of a method for identification of faces as childish. Second International Conference on Reconstruction of Soft Facial Parts, RheinAhrCampus Remagen.
Introna, F., De Donno, A., Santoro, V., & Carbonara, M. (2007). Poor reliability of facial indices for comparative metric facial identification without parametrical superimposition. Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology, 3(4), 275–282.
Jahanbin, A., Rashed, R., Yazdani, R., Shahri, N. M., & Kianifar, H. (2013). Evaluation of some facial anthropometric parameters in an Iranian population: Infancy through adolescence. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 24(3), 941–945.
Kleinberg, K. F., Vanezis, P., & Burton, A. M. (2007). Failure of anthropometry as a facial identification technique using high-quality photographs. Journal of forensic sciences, 52(4), 779–783.
Kleinhans, C. (2004). Virtual child porn: The law and the semiotics of the image. Journal of visual culture, 3(1), 17–34.
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(10), e1–e34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006
Lopes, J. R. (2012). Eficácia do método de estimativa de idade de Lamendin [PhD Thesis]. Universidade de São Paulo.
Machado, C. E. P., Flores, M. R. P., Lima, L. N. C., Tinoco, R. L. R., Franco, A., Bezerra, A. C. B., Evison, M. P., & Guimaraes, M. A. (2017). A new approach for the analysis of facial growth and age estimation: Iris ratio. PloS One, 12(7), e0180330. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180330
Maia, L. C., & Antonio, A. G. (2012). Systematic reviews in dental research. A guideline. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 37(2), 117–124.
Moreton, R., & Morley, J. (2011). Investigation into the use of photoanthropometry in facial image comparison. Forensic science international, 212(1–3), 231–237.
Ratnayake, M., Obertova, Z., Dose, M., Gabriel, P., Broker, H. M., Brauckmann, M., Barkus, A., Rizgeliene, R., Tutkuviene, J., Ritz-Timme, S., Marasciuolo, L., Gibelli, D., & Cattaneo, C. (2014). The juvenile face as a suitable age indicator in child pornography cases: A pilot study on the reliability of automated and visual estimation approaches. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 128(5), 803–808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-013-0875-y
Schaaf, H., Wilbrand, J.-F., Boedeker, R.-H., & Howaldt, H.-P. (2010). Accuracy of Photographic Assessment Compared with Standard Anthropometric Measurements in Nonsynostotic Cranial Deformities. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 47(5), 447–453. https://doi.org/10.1597/09-026
Schmeling, A., Grundmann, C., Fuhrmann, A., Kaatsch, H.-J., Knell, B., Ramsthaler, F., Reisinger, W., Riepert, T., Ritz-Timme, S., Rosing, F. W., Rotzscher, K., & Geserick, G. (2008). Criteria for age estimation in living individuals. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 122(6), 457–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-008-0254-2
Wall, S., Kazahaya, K., Becker, S. S., & Becker, D. G. (1999). Thirty-five millimeter versus digital photography: Comparison of photographic quality and clinical evaluation. Facial plastic surgery, 15(02), 101–109.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Yanka Barbosa Alves; Tainá Nascimento Falcão; Loyse Martorano Fernandes; Johnys Berton Medeiros da Nóbrega; Laíse Nascimento Correia Lima; Carlos Eduardo Palhares Machado; Bianca Marques Santiago
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
