Hospital health profile of patients undergoing robotic surgery: a retrospective observational study

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i3.13092

Keywords:

Health profile; Hospital surgical center; Robotic surgical procedures; Perioperative period.

Abstract

Robotic surgery is a minimally invasive technology with the need for specific training and knowledge of the clientele to operationalize this resource. In-depth knowledge of this reality and the determining factors of clinical and procedural aspects in training hospitals is necessary. The study aimed to identify the surgical profile of patients undergoing robotic surgery at a university hospital. As a methodology, this is a retrospective study, with a descriptive quantitative approach. Data collection was based on the medical records of users assisted by the robotic surgery team, from July to December 2019. The results showed that 139 procedures were performed, with urological surgery being the main robotic specialty (61.2%), in men (64.7%) between 60 and 69 years old (43.2%), ASA 2 (77.7%) and hypertension the most frequent risk factor (46.8%). Robotic surgery uses general anesthesia (91.3%) with an average time of 2 to 4 hours of surgery (43.2%) and 4 to 6 hours under anesthetic effect (57.5%). The Trendelemburg position associated with the lithotomy occurred in most surgeries (45.3%) with an ELPO scale with a score greater than or equal to 20 (52.5%). Capnography is essential (95.7%) in addition to peripheral venous access (97.9%), with perioperative complications being the difficult airway (2.9%), although the scores are low according to international data. Conclusion: The data obtained in this study allowed to identify the profile of this clientele, offering a basis for the health team to act according to the surgical specificity.

Author Biography

Ricardo de Oliveira Meneses, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro; Instituto Federal de Educação Ciência e Tecnologia do Rio de Janeiro

Rio de Janeiro - RJ

References

Arslan, M. E., & Özgök, A. (2018). Complications of robotic and laparoscopic urologic surgery relevant to anesthesia. Mini-invasive Surgery, 2(3), 4. https://doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2017.31

Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. (2015). Diretrizes Diagnósticas e Terapêuticas do Adenocarcinoma de Próstata. http://conitec.gov.br/images/Consultas/Relatorios/2015/DDT_Adenocarcinomadeprostata_CP.pdf

Carlos, G. & Saulan, M. (2018) Robotic Emergencies: Are You Prepared for a Disaster? AORN, 108(5), 493-501. Doi:10.1002/aorn.12393.

Coelho, B. A. C. (2016) Revisão de Procedimentos Anestésicos para Prostatectomia Radical Robótica. [Dissertação de Mestrado em medicina]. Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa. https://repositorio.ul.pt/bitstream/10451/26256/1/BeatrizACCoelho.pdf

CONITEC (2018) Relatório de recomendação: Sistema cirúrgico robótico para cirurgia minimamente invasiva: Prostatectomia radical, 2018. http://conitec.gov.br/images/Relatorios/2018/Recomendacao/Relatorio_DaVinci_Prostatectomia.pdf

Esqueda, S. D. et al. (2020) Prostatectomía radical robótica: una revisión de aspectos anestésicos. An Med (Mex), 65(2), pp. 122-129. https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/94365.

Lopes, C. M. M., Haas, V. J., Dantas, R. A. S., Oliveira, C. G. & Galvão, C. M. (2016). Assessment scale of risk for surgical positioning injuries. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 24, e2704. Epub 29 de agosto de 2016.https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.0644.2704

Madureira, F. A. V., Varela, J. L. S., Madureira Filho, D., D'Almeida, L. A. V., Madureira, F. A. V., Duarte, A. M., Vaz, O. P., & Ramos, J. R. (2017). Model of a training program in robotic surgery and its initial results. Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões, 44(3), 302-307. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-69912017003013

Morrell, A. L. G., Morrell-Junior, A. C., Morrell, A. G., Mendes, J. M. F., Tustumi, F., De-Oliveira-E-Silva, L. G., & Morrell, A. (2021). The history of robotic surgery and its evolution: when illusion becomes reality. Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões, 48, e20202798. Epub 13 de janeiro de 2021.https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6991e-20202798.

Maerz, D. A., Beck, L. N., Sim, A. J., & Gainsburg, D. M. (2017). Complications of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery distant from the surgical site. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 118(4), pp. 492–503. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aex003

Nacul, M. P., Melani, A. G. F., Zilberstein, B., Benevenuto, D. S., Cavazzola, L. T., Araujo, R. L.C., Sallum, R. A. A., Aguiar-Jr, S., & Tomasich, F. (2020). Educational note: teaching and training in robotic surgery. An opinion of the Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery Committee of the Brazilian College of Surgeons. Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões, 47, e20202681. Epub 12 de agosto de 2020.https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6991e-20202681

Pinto, E., Lunardi, L., Treviso, P., & Botene, D. (2018). Atuação do enfermeiro na cirurgia robótica: desafios e perspectivas. Revista SOBECC, 23(1), 43-51. doi:https://doi.org/10.5327/Z1414-4425201800010008

Ramos, A. C., Domene, C. E., Volpe, P., Pajecki, D., D'Almeida, L. A. V., Ramos, M. G., Bastos, E. L. S, & Kim, K. C. (2013). Resultados iniciais da primeira série de casos brasileira de cirurgia bariátrica totalmente robótica. ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo), 26(Supl. 1), 2-7. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-67202013000600002

Rosa, M. F., Moreira, M. S. & Leite, J. B. A. (2012) Aplicação da Robótica nos Centros Cirúrgicos. Instituto Nacional de Telecomunicações, MG. https://www.inatel.br/ic/docman/artigos-publicados-s763609-1/biomedica-s418539-1

Skinovsky, J., Chibata, M. & Siqueira, D. E. D. (2008) Realidade virtual e robótica em cirurgia – aonde chegamos e para onde vamos? Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões, . 35(5), pp. 334-337. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-69912008000500011.

Sousa, C., Bispo, D., & Acunã, A. (2018). Criação de um manual para posicionamento cirúrgico : relato de experiência. Revista SOBECC, 23(3), pp. 169-175. doi:https://doi.org/10.5327/Z1414-4425201800030009.

Sousa, J. M. B. R. & Mourão, J. I. B. (2015). Lesão dentária na anestesiologia. Rev. Bras. Anestesiol., 65(6), pp.511-518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjan.2013.04.009.

Yonekura, H., Hirate, H., & Sobue, K. (2016). Comparison of anesthetic management and outcomes of robot-assisted vs pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, 35, 281–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.08.014.

Yetim, Memduh, Tekindur, Sukru, & Kilickaya, Oguz. (2017). Preventing atelectasia at robotic surgery. Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia, 67(1), 112-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2015.04.004

Published

15/03/2021

How to Cite

MENESES, R. de O.; MATOS, L. C. .; ELEUTERIO, T. de A. .; FASSARELLA, C. S.; PINHEIRO, D. dos S. .; BENJAMIM, G. P. C. . Hospital health profile of patients undergoing robotic surgery: a retrospective observational study. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 3, p. e23310313092, 2021. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v10i3.13092. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/13092. Acesso em: 18 apr. 2021.

Issue

Section

Health Sciences