An analysis about educational philosophies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i6.13519Keywords:
Educational philosophy; Philosophical approaches; Education.Abstract
The approached content has as its main foundation to analyze an educational philosophy, especially with regard to philosophical approaches. In this perspective, this article, through exploratory research, of a qualitative nature, deductive method, collection of bibliographic data, proceeded in order to carry out an analysis about the educational philosophical lines currently adopted by teachers with the styles of effective teaching in the daily life of the school. classroom. Nevertheless, they were imputed to the criteria adopted by the “Evaluation of Philosophical Preferences”, which was developed by Wiles and Bondi (2007) and adapted by Doğanay and Sari (2003), categorizing into five educational philosophies, being perennialism, idealism, realism, experimentalism and existentialism. Finally, in view of the exposed problem, it was sought to elucidate the need for continuity of philosophical study, based on social promotion and social well-being, to outline mechanisms capable of preserving and guaranteeing the fundamental right to education, in view of the substantial disadvantages harmed to the Democratic State of Law for non-observance of this guarantee.
References
Alberes, R. (1978). Sartre. Barcelona-España: Fontanella.
Demirel, O. (2005). Egitimde Yeni Yönelimler. Ankara: Pegem A Yayincilik.
Doğanay, A., & Sari, M. (2003). İlköğretim öğretmenlerinin sahip olduklari eğitim felsefelerine ilişkin algilarinin değerlendirilmesi “Öğretmenlerin eğitim felsefeleri”. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi 1(3).
Ediger, M. (2000). Philosophy perspectives in teaching social studies. J. Instructional Psychology, https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1G1-63365165/ adresinden alinmiştir.
Elias, J. L., & Merriam, S. B. (1995). Philosophical foundations of adult education. (2nd ed.). Malabar, FL: Krieger Publishing Company.
Fischer, B. B., & Fischer, L. (1979). Styles in teaching and learning. Educ. Leadership, 36(4).
Fries, C. H. (2012). Teaching style preferences and educational philosophy of teacher education faculty at a state university. (Ph.D. dissertation) Oklahoma State University.
Fritz, A. (2008). Educational philosophies and teaching styles of oklahoma elementary public school teachers of english language learners. (Ph.D. dissertation) Oklahoma State University.
Heimlich, J., & Norland, E. (1994). Developing teaching style in adult education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
KAUCHAK, D. and EGGEN, P. (2011). Introduction to teaching: Becoming a professional (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
Livingston, M. J., Mcclain, B. R., & Despain, B. C. (2001). Assessing the consistency between teachers’ philosophies and educational goals. Goals and Philosophical Educ. 116(1):126.
Ornstein, C. A., & Hunkins, F. P. (1988). Curriculum: Foundations. USA: Principles and Issues.
Wiles, J., & Bondi, J. (2007). Curriculum Development a Guide to Practice. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Printice Hall.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 José Cândido da Silva Nóbrega; Mônica Barbosa de Sousa Freitas; Francisco das Chagas Bezerra Neto; Wesley Queiroz Peixoto; José Marcolino Neto; João Paulo Borges de Queiroz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.