Perspectives of robotics as a pedagogical resource applied to education 4.0: A bibliometric analysis on educational robotics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i4.13889Keywords:
Education 4.0; Digital education; Educational robotics; Technological education.Abstract
The Fourth Industrial Revolution extended digital transformation to the educational environment by reconfiguring the labor market and requiring new skills and skills from professionals. Thus, Education 4.0 proposes the insertion of new technologies in the educational environment so that the teaching-learning process transcends traditional education by boosting innovative teaching and learning by doing, opening space for learning based on experimentation, project development and experiences. In this scenario, educational robotics presents itself as a pedagogical resource capable of assisting the technological-digital transition of education. The objective of this research is to analyze educational robotics as a pedagogical resource able to attribute to teaching and learning current resources towards Education 4.0. For this, a bibliometric analysis of word co-occurrence was developed, aiming to survey the main terms related to educational robotics present in the literature and understand the expansion of robotics as a pedagogical resource over the years. The results showed that robotics as a pedagogical resource is in full expansion promoting learning by experimentation, being associated with computational thinking, constructivist and constructionist learning theories and promoting teaching based on problem solving. Characterized as a current pedagogical resource capable of providing a multidisciplinary learning environment favoring digital integration in the daily life of students and the incorporation of skills and attitudes able to prepare them for the full exercise of citizenship in a constantly evolving society.
References
Beckett, K. S (2013). Paulo Freire and the Concept of Education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 45 (1), 49-62.
Bellis, N (2009). Bibliometrics and citation analysis. EUA: Scarecrow Press.
Benešová, A. & Tupa, J (2017). Requirements for Education and Qualification of People in Industry 4.0. Procedia Manufacturing, 11.
Bezerra, R. P. et. al (2015). Robótica na Educação: Uma Revisão Sistemática dos Últimos 10 Anos. In: XXVI Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação.
Botomés. P. & Kubo, O. M. (2001). Ensino-aprendizagem: uma interação entre dois processos comportamentais. Interação em psicologia, 5.
Bruner, J. S. (2008). Sobre o conhecimento: ensaios da mão esquerda. São Paulo: Phorte editora.
Carey, S., Zaitchik, D. & Bascandziev, I. (2015). Theories of development: In dialog with Jean Piaget. Developmental Review.
Castro, R. M. de; & Lanzi, L. A. C. (2017). O futuro da escola e as tecnologias: alguns aspectos à luz do diálogo entre Paulo Freire e Seymour Papert. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estudos em Educação, 1496-1510.
Coll, C. (1999). Escola e comunidade: um novo compromisso. Revista Pátio, São Paulo, 10.
D’ABREU, J. V. V. (2014). Robótica pedagógica: Percurso e perspectivas. Workshop de Robótica Educacional.
EGUCHI, A. (2014). Educational robotics for promoting twenty-first century skills. Journal of Automation, Mobile Robotics & Intelligent Systems, 8 (1), 5–11.
Fisk, P. (2020). Education 4.0: The future of learning will be dramatically different, in school and throughout life. https://www.thegeniusworks.com/2017/01/future-education-young-everyone-taught-together/.
Fonseca, E. N. (1986). Bibliometria: Teoria e Prática. São Paulo: Cultrix, 1986.
Fracasso, N. et. al (2018). Análise do impacto da robótica educacional no desempenho e nas escolhas acadêmicas de alunos do ensino técnico integrado: um estudo no escopo do IFSP São Carlos. In: WORKSHOP DE INOVAÇÃO, PESQUISA, ENSINO E EXTENSÃO, 3, São Carlos, SP.
Frank, A. G., Dalenogare, L. S. & Ayalam N. F. (2019). Industry 4.0 technologies: Implementation patterns in manufacturing companies. International Journal of Production Economics, 201, 15-26.
Freire, P (2019). Pedagogia da autonomia: Saberes necessários a prática educativa (60 ed). São Paulo: Paz & Terra.
Führ, R. C. (2019). Educação 4.0 nos impactos da quarta revolução industrial (1 ed.). Curitiba: Appris.
Gerecke, U. & Wagner, B. (2007). The challenges and benefits of using robots in higher education. Intell Autom Soft Comput, 13 (1), 29–43.
Gil, A. C. (2002). Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa (4. ed.) São Paulo: Atlas.
Ishak, R & Mansor, M. (2020). The Relationship between Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning with Academic Staff Readiness for Education 4.0. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 85, 169-184.
Halili, S. H. (2019). Technological advancements in education 4.0. Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 7 (1).
Lin, C. et. al (2009). A case analysis of creative spiral instruction model and students’ creative problem solving performance in a Lego® robotics course. In: Chang M, Kuo R, Kinshuk, Chen G-D, Hirose M (eds) Edutainment. Springer, Heidelberg,5670, 501–505.
Liu, E., Lin, C.& CHANG, C. (2010). Student satisfaction and selfefficacy in a cooperative robotics course. Soc Behav Personal, 38 (8), 1135–1146.
Lu, J. J.; Fletcher, G. H. (2009). Thinking about computational thinking. In Proc. 40th Technical Symp. on Comp. Sci. Education, 260–264, New York, USA. ACM.
Marconi, M. de A. & Lakatos, E. M. (2018). Metodologia do trabalho científico (8. ed.). São Paulo: Atlas.
Mauch, E. (2001). Using technological innovation to improve the problem-solving skills of middle school students: educators’ experiences with the LEGO Mindstorms robotic invention system. Clear House, 74 (4), 211–213.
Metsämuuronen, J. & RÄSÄNEN, P. (2018). Cognitive-Linguistic and constructivist mnemonic triggers in teaching based on Jerome Bruner’s thinking. Hypothesis and Theory, 9.
Moreira, M. A. (1999). Teorias de aprendizagem. São Paulo: EPU.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2019). Future of Education and Skills 2030. OCDE.
Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M. & Zaranis, N. (2016). Developing fundamental programming concepts and computational thinking with ScratchJr in preschool education: a case study. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organization, 10 (3).
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books, New York, USA.
Pass, S. (2007). When Constructivists Jean Piaget and Lev Vygotsky were pedagogical collaborators: A viewpoint from a study of their Communications. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 20 (3), 277-282.
Peralta, D. A. (2019). Robótica e Processos Formativos: da epistemologia aos kits. Porto Alegre: Fi. https://www.editorafi.org/729robotica
Perrenoud, P. (2000). 10 novas competências para ensinar. Porto Alegre: Artmed.
Perrenoud, P. (1999). Profissionalização do professor e desenvolvimento de ciclos de aprendizagem. Cadernos de pesquisa,. (10), 7-26.
Petre M.& Price, B. (2004). Using robotics to motivate ‘back door’ learning. Educ Inf Technol, 9 (2), 147–158.
Pugliese, G. (2020). STEM Education – um panorama e sua relação com a educação brasileira. Currículo sem Fronteiras, 20 (12).
Santos, F. & Sobral Júnior, G. A. (2020). Dimensão da robótica educacional como espaço educativo. Dialogia, 50-65.
Santos, R. A. dos. (2015). Análise de coocorrência de palavras na pesquisa brasileira em hiv/aids indexadas na web os science no período de 1993-2013. (Dissertação de Mestrado) - Curso de Comunicação e Informação, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Comunicação e Informação, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre. https://lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/handle/10183/122180/000971529.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
Santos, R. C. (2019). Robótica Educacional Inclusiva: uma experiência com alunos da rede pública de ensino. (Dissertação de Mestrado) - Curso de Mestrado Acadêmico em Ensino, Programa de Pós Graduação em Ensino, Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista.
Santos, T., Pozzebon, E. & Frigo, L. (2013). A utilização de robótica nas disciplinas da educação básica. In: Simpósio de Integração Científica e Tecnológica do Sul Catarinense. Anais... Araranguá: Tecnologia e Educação no Desenvolvimento Regional, 616-623.
Santoya–Mendoza, A. et. al. (2018). Robótica educativa desde la investigación como estrategia pedagógica apoyada en tic en la escuela. Cultura. Educación y Sociedad ,9(3),.699-708.
Saviani, Dermeval. (2000). Educação – Do Senso Comum à Consciência Filosófica. Coleção educação contemporânea (13 ed.). Ed. Autores Associados: Campinas-SP.
SCHWAB, K. (2016). A quarta revolução industrial. São Paulo: Edipro.
SCHWAB, K. & DAVIS, N. (2018). Aplicando a quarta revolução industrial. São Paulo: Edipro.
Silva, R. B.; Blikstein, P. Robótica Educacional: experiências inovadoras na educação brasileira. Porto Alegre: Penso.
Stapleton, L.& Stefaniak, J. (2019). Cognitive constructivism: Revisiting Jerome Bruner’s influence on instructional design practices. TechTrends, 63.
Tandon, R. & Tandon, S. (2020). Education 4.0: A New Paradigm in Transforming the Future of Education in India. IJISET - International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, 7 (2).
Upham, P., Carney, S. & Klapper, R. (2014). Scaffolding, software and scenarios: Applying Bruner's learning theory to energy scenario development with the public. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 81, 131-142.
Whittaker, J. (1989). Creativity and conformity in Science: titles, Keywords and co-word analysis. Social Studies in Science, 19 (3), 473-496.
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Commun. ACM, 49(3), 33 – 35.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Tamires Fernanda Barbosa Nunes; Carol Correia Viana; Luiz Augusto Ferreira de Campos Viana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
