Risks and benefits of different methods of complementery feeding
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i4.14290Keywords:
Complementary feeding; BLW; Child nutrition; Breast feeding; Gagging.Abstract
Introduction: The first years of a child's life are characterized by rapid growth and digestive and neuropsychomotor development, including skills such as: receiving, chewing and digesting foods other than breast milk. Objective: to understand if there are any of the different complementary feeding methods that offer greater risk or benefits for the baby's health, development and safety. Methodology: Complementary feeding AND Baby led weaning AND Infant nutrition were used. According to the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and Descriptors in Health Sciences (DeCS), of the three thermologies, only one, Infant Nutrition, appears in the controlled vocabulary. Among the 105 articles found, 71 from the US National Library of Medicine (PubMed) and 34 from the Virtual Health Library (VHL), 23 were present in both databases, 21 articles were read in full and 8 were eligible for the present work Results and discussion: 8 papers were analyzed for this review, of which 6 are randomized clinical trials, 1 pilot study conducted through a questionnaire and 1 study conducted through an online questionnaire. In addition to the values based on the weighing of the diet, at 12 months the babies underwent a laboratory evaluation through blood collection. The values for hemoglobin (g / dl) in the control group was 11.7 and in the BLISS group 11.6. Conclusion: This review did not identify significant differences between the different methods of food introduction.
References
Andries e Arantes, A. L., Neves F. S., Campos A. A. L., & Netto M. P.(2018). The baby-led weaning method (BLW) in the context of complementary feeding: A review. Revista Paulista de Pediatria, 36(3), 353–363.
Brown, A. (2017) No difference in self-reported frequency of choking between infants introduced to solid foods using a baby-led weaning or traditional spoon-feeding approach.
Cameron, S. L.; Taylor, R. W.; & Heath, A.-L. M. (2015). Development and pilot testing of Baby-Led Introduction to SolidS-a version of Baby-Led Weaning modified to address concerns about iron deficiency, growth faltering and choking.
Daniels, L. et al. (2018). Impact of a modified version of baby-led weaning on iron intake and status: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open,8, 19036.
Daniels, L. et al. (2018) Modified Version of Baby-Led Weaning Does Not Result in Lower Zinc Intake or Status in Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Acad Nutr Diet,1006–1016.
De-la-Torre-Ugarte-Guanilo, M. C., Takahashi, R. F., & Bertolozzi, M. R. (2011). Revisão sistemática: noções gerais.
Dogan, E., et al. (2018). Baby-led complementary feeding: Randomized controlled study. Pediatrics International,1073–1080.
Erickson, L. W., et al. (2018). Impact of a Modified Version of Baby-Led Weaning on Infant Food and Nutrient Intakes: The BLISS Randomized Controlled Trial. Nutrients,10, 740.
Fangupo, L. J., et al. (2016) A baby-led approach to eating solids and risk of choking. Pediatrics, 138(4).
Lima, D. B. et al.(2012). Alimentação na primeira infância no Brasil. Revista de APS, 15(3).
Lopes, W. C. et al. (2018) Alimentação de crianças nos primeiros dois anos de vida. Rev. paul. pediatr,164-170.
Monte, C. M. G., & Giugliani, E. R. J. (2004.) Recomendações para alimentação complementar da criança em aleitamento materno. J Pediatr, 80(5), 131-141.
Morison, B. J. et al. (2016). How different are baby-led weaning and conventional complementary feeding? A cross-sectional study of infants aged 6-8 months. BMJ Open, 6, 10665.
Rapley G., Tracey M. (2008). Baby-led weaning. Essence; 44:1
Rapley G. (2015). Baby-led weaning: The theory and evidence behind the approach. Journal of Health Visiting, 3(3), 144-151.
Sankar, M. J., Sinha, B., Chowdhury, R., Bhandari, N., Taneja, S., Martines, J., et al. (2015). Optimal breastfeeding practices and infant and child mortality: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Acta Paediatr. 104(467),3-13.
SBP. Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria. (2012). Manual de orientação para a alimentação do lactente, do pré-escolar, do escolar, do adolescente e na escola/Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria. Departamento de Nutrologia, (3a. ed.).
SBP. Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria. (2017). Guia Prático de Atualização. A Alimentação Complementar e o Método BLW (Baby-Led Weaning). Departamento de Nutrologia.
Sorrentino, E. (2018). Alimentação complementar: barreiras e facilitadores sob a ótica de cuidadores. Projeto de dissertação de mestrado. Faculdade de Saúde Pública São Paulo: da USP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Taylor, R. W., et al. (2017) Effect of a Baby-Led Approach to Complementary Feeding on Infant Growth and Overweight A Randomized Clinical Trial Supplemental content. JAMA Pediatr,171(9), 838–846.
Victora, C. G., Bahl, R., Barros, A. J. D., França, G. V. A., Horton, S., & Krasevec, J. (2016) Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. The Lancet, 387.
WHO. (2001). Global Consultation on Complementary Feeding. Guiding Principles for Complementary Feeding of the Breastfeed.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Camila Conceição Santos Temóteo; Débora Cristina Leite Fontes; Alessandro Santos Ferreira
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
