Minimally invasive surgery x conventional surgery on rate recovery rate and aesthetic previsibility: An integrative review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i5.14314Keywords:
Minimally invasive surgery; Gingival recession; Periodontal plastic surgery.Abstract
Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is a term that describes noninvasive surgical procedures with or without magnification instruments but there is no scientific evidence yet if there is greater aesthetic predictability and root coverage rate in MIS compared to root surgery conventation. Thus, na integrative literatura review was performed using the following searh strategy: (microsurgery OR surgical AND minimally invasive surgical OR surgery AND gingival recession AND periodontal plastic surgery OR surgical AND root coverage). In Scielo, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Science Direct, BVS and Google Scholar databases using articles published between 2011 – 2020. A total of 546 articles were found and after selection according to the inclusion criteria 05 articles remained for the study all randomized clinical trials. The evaluated information of the articles were their objectives sample size surgical techniques performed the follow – up time and the results and conclusion. Based on the analysis it can be concluded that the MIS does not required the use of magnification instuments. Tunneling performed for root coverage provides better results such as tissue and aesthetic gain over the Coronal Traction Flap especially for Miller classes I and II. The use of connective graft associated with MIS increased the predictability of satisfactory results.
References
Aimetti, M., Ferrarotti, F., Mariani, G. M., & Romano, F. (2017). A novel flapless approach versus minimally invasive surgery in periodontal regeneration with enamel matrix derivative proteins: a 24-month randomized controlled clinical trial. Clinical oral investigations, 21(1), 327-337.
Azaripour, A., Kissinger, M., Farina, V. S. L., Van Noorden, C. J., Gerhold‐Ay, A., Willershausen, B., & Cortellini, P. (2016). Root coverage with connective tissue graft associated with coronally advanced flap or tunnel technique: a randomized, double‐blind, mono‐centre clinical trial. Journal of clinical periodontology, 43(12), 1142-1150.
Bittencourt, S., Del Peloso Ribeiro, É., Sallum, E. A., Nociti Jr, F. H., & Casati, M. Z. (2012). Surgical microscope may enhance root coverage with subepithelial connective tissue graft: A randomized‐controlled clinical trial. Journal of periodontology, 83(6), 721-730.
Cairo, F., Nieri, M., & Pagliaro, U. (2014). Efficacy of periodontal plastic surgery procedures in the treatment of localized facial gingival recessions. A systematic review. Journal of clinical periodontology, 41, S44-S62.
Chambrone, L., Pannuti, C. M., Tu, Y. K., & Chambrone, L. A. (2012). Evidence‐based periodontal plastic surgery. II. An individual data meta‐analysis for evaluating factors in achieving complete root coverage. Journal of periodontology, 83(4), 477-490.
Chambrone, L., Sukekava, F., Araújo, M. G., Pustiglioni, F. E., Chambrone, L. A., & Lima, L. A. (2010). Root‐coverage procedures for the treatment of localized recession‐type defects: A Cochrane systematic review. Journal of periodontology, 81(4), 452-478.
Cortellini, P., & Tonetti, M. S. (2001). Microsurgical approach to periodontal regeneration. Initial evaluation in a case cohort. Journal of Periodontology, 72(4), 559-569.
Cortellini, P., & Tonetti, M. S. (2005). Clinical performance of a regenerative strategy for intrabony defects: scientific evidence and clinical experience. Journal of periodontology, 76(3), 341-350.
Frizzera, F., Vieira, G. H., Molon, R. S., Peçanha, M. M., Marcantonio Jr, E., & Sampaio, J. E. C. (2013). Recobrimento radicular para o tratamento de hipersensibilidade dentinária cervical persistente. Perionews, 42-49.
Harrel, S. K., Nunn, M. E., Abraham, C. M., Rivera‐Hidalgo, F., Shulman, J. D., & Tunnell, J. C. (2017). Videoscope assisted minimally invasive surgery (VMIS): 36‐month results. Journal of periodontology, 88(6), 528-535.
Harrel, S. K., Wilson Jr, T. G., & Nunn, M. E. (2010). Prospective assessment of the use of enamel matrix derivative with minimally invasive surgery: 6‐year results. Journal of periodontology, 81(3), 435-441.
Kahn, S., Rodrigues, W. J. D. P. R., & Barceleiro, M. D. O. (2013). Periodontal plastic microsurgery in the treatment of deep gingival recession after orthodontic movement. Case reports in dentistry, 2013.
Kareem, N., Mahendra, J., & Kumar, K. A. (2018). Triangular coronally advanced flap: Conventional versus Microsurgery. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology, 22(1), 73.
Menezes, C. C. D., Kahn, S., Egreja, A. M. C., Silva, J. A. D., & Machado, W. A. (2011). Periodontal microsurgery: a Brazilian overview. RGO. Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia (Online), 59(4), 583-589.
Ramos, U., Novaes Jr, A., Souza, S., Palioto, D., Taba Jr, M. & Grisi, M., 2011. Minimally invasive procedures in periodontology and implantology. Braz J Periodontol, 21(4), pp.32-38.
Ryder, M. I., & Armitage, G. C. (2016). Minimally invasive periodontal therapy for general practitioners. Periodontology 2000, 71(1), 7-9.
Shruthi, S., Gujjari, S. K., & Mallya, K. P. (2015). Comparison of two surgical techniques for the reconstruction of interdental papilla. Journal of Interdisciplinary Dentistry, 5(1), 17.
Tunnell, J. C., & Harrel, S. K. (2017). Minimally Invasive Surgery in Periodontal Regeneration: A Review of the Literature. Compendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, NJ: 1995), 38(4), e13-e16.
Vieira, T. R., de Oliveira, D. W. D., Lages, F. S., Soares, R. V., Horta, M. C. R., & Zenóbio, E. G. (2016). Effect of Periodontal Parameters on Root Coverage. Journal of the International Academy of Periodontology, 18(3), 86-93.
Zadeh, H. H. (2011). Minimally invasive treatment of maxillary anterior gingival recession defects by vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access and platelet-derived growth factor BB. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry, 31(6), 653.
Zuhr, O., Rebele, S. F., Schneider, D., Jung, R. E., & Hürzeler, M. B. (2014). Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a RCT using 3D digital measuring methods. Part I. Clinical and patient‐centred outcomes. Journal of clinical periodontology, 41(6), 582-592.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Silvano Santos Pinheiro; Francisco de Assis de Souza Junior; Isaías Lopes de Medeiros; Bruno Cesar de Vasconcelos Gurgel; Euler Maciel Dantas; Ana Rafaela Luz de Aquino Martins
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
