Are the rates of cracks and fractures in ceramic veneers for occlusal reasons? A systematic review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i5.14620Keywords:
Ceramics; Dental Occlusion; Dental restoration failure.Abstract
Objective: to assess, based on a systematic review, what the crack and fracture rate in ceramic veneer is, in order to establish the main causes for these failures. Methodology: A systematic review of prospective and retrospective clinical studies that analyzed the failure rate due to cracks or fractures in the restoration of teeth restored with ceramic veneers was carried out. The descriptors “ceramic” and “veneer” were used, adapted according to the databases consulted: Science Direct, LILACS, MEDLINE (PubMed) and Google Scholar. Initially, 755 articles were found, after reading and applying the eligibility and exclusion criteria, 4 articles were selected for the quantitative and 5 for the qualitative analyses. This review followed the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyzes (PRISMA). Results: Marginal discoloration was the most commonly found failure (17.2%), followed by periodontal or gingival inflammation (12.8%), debonding (4.4%), crack of ceramic (2.7%) and fracture of ceramic (1.7%). Failures due to endodontic injury, secondary caries, tooth fracture and color change of the ceramic were less than 1%. Conclusion: Attention to occlusion, its studies and concepts, must be taken into account in the entire process of treatment with ceramic veneers to ensure longevity and clinical success.
References
Abduo, J., Tennant, M., & McGeachie, J. (2013). Lateral occlusion schemes in natural and minimally restored permanent dentition: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil, 40(10), 788-802. doi:10.1111/joor.12095
Albanesi, R. B., Pigozzo, M. N., Sesma, N., Laganá, D. C., & Morimoto, S. (2016). Incisal coverage or not in ceramic laminate veneers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent, 52, 1-7. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2016.06.004
Alhekeir, D. F., Al-Sarhan, R. A., & Al Mashaan, A. F. (2014). Porcelain laminate veneers: Clinical survey for evaluation of failure. Saudi Dent J, 26(2), 63-67. doi:10.1016/j.sdentj.2014.02.003
Alothman, Y., & Bamasoud, M. S. (2018). The Success of Dental Veneers According To Preparation Design and Material Type. Open Access Maced J Med Sci, 6(12), 2402-2408. doi:10.3889/oamjms.2018.353
Badel, T., Marotti, M., Pavicin, I. S., & Basić-Kes, V. (2012). Temporomandibular disorders and occlusion. Acta Clin Croat, 51(3), 419-424.
Beier, U. S., Kapferer, I., Burtscher, D., & Dumfahrt, H. (2012). Clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneers for up to 20 years. Int J Prosthodont, 25(1), 79-85.
Beier, U. S., Kapferer, I., & Dumfahrt, H. (2012). Clinical long-term evaluation and failure characteristics of 1,335 all-ceramic restorations. Int J Prosthodont, 25(1), 70-78.
Calamia, J. R., & Calamia, C. S. (2007). Porcelain laminate veneers: reasons for 25 years of success. Dent Clin North Am, 51(2), 399-417, ix. doi:10.1016/j.cden.2007.03.008
Carlsson, G. E. (2010). Some dogmas related to prosthodontics, temporomandibular disorders and occlusion. Acta Odontol Scand, 68(6), 313-322. doi:10.3109/00016357.2010.517412
Denissen, H. W., Wijnhoff, G. F., Veldhuis, A. A., & Kalk, W. (1993). Five-year study of all-porcelain veneer fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent, 69(5), 464-468. doi:10.1016/0022-3913(93)90154-g
Granell-Ruiz, M., Fons-Font, A., Labaig-Rueda, C., Martínez-González, A., Román-Rodríguez, J. L., & Solá-Ruiz, M. F. (2010). A clinical longitudinal study 323 porcelain laminate veneers. Period of study from 3 to 11 years. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 15(3), e531-537. doi:10.4317/medoral.15.e531
Gresnigt, M. M. M., Cune, M. S., Schuitemaker, J., van der Made, S. A. M., Meisberger, E. W., Magne, P., & Özcan, M. (2019). Performance of ceramic laminate veneers with immediate dentine sealing: An 11 year prospective clinical trial. Dent Mater, 35(7), 1042-1052. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2019.04.008
Gurel, G., Sesma, N., Calamita, M. A., Coachman, C., & Morimoto, S. (2013). Influence of enamel preservation on failure rates of porcelain laminate veneers. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 33(1), 31-39. doi:10.11607/prd.1488
Hui, K. K., Williams, B., Davis, E. H., & Holt, R. D. (1991). A comparative assessment of the strengths of porcelain veneers for incisor teeth dependent on their design characteristics. Br Dent J, 171(2), 51-55. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.4807602
Kundapur, P. P., Bhat, K. M., & Bhat, G. S. (2009). Association of trauma from occlusion with localized gingival recession in mandibular anterior teeth. Dent Res J (Isfahan), 6(2), 71-74.
Layton, D. M., & Clarke, M. (2013). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the survival of non-feldspathic porcelain veneers over 5 and 10 years. Int J Prosthodont, 26(2), 111-124. doi:10.11607/ijp.3202
Layton, D. M., & Walton, T. R. (2012). The up to 21-year clinical outcome and survival of feldspathic porcelain veneers: accounting for clustering. Int J Prosthodont, 25(6), 604-612.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med, 6(7), e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Nejatidanesh, F., Savabi, G., Amjadi, M., Abbasi, M., & Savabi, O. (2018). Five year clinical outcomes and survival of chairside CAD/CAM ceramic laminate veneers - a retrospective study. J Prosthodont Res, 62(4), 462-467. doi:10.1016/j.jpor.2018.05.004
O'Carroll, E., Leung, A., Fine, P. D., Boniface, D., & Louca, C. (2019). The teaching of occlusion in undergraduate dental schools in the UK and Ireland. Br Dent J, 227(6), 512-517. doi:10.1038/s41415-019-0732-6
Peumans, M., Van Meerbeek, B., Lambrechts, P., & Vanherle, G. (2000). Porcelain veneers: a review of the literature. J Dent, 28(3), 163-177. doi:10.1016/s0300-5712(99)00066-4
Racich, M. J. (2018). Occlusion, temporomandibular disorders, and orofacial pain: An evidence-based overview and update with recommendations. J Prosthet Dent, 120(5), 678-685. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.01.033
Rinke, S., Lange, K., & Ziebolz, D. (2013). Retrospective study of extensive heat-pressed ceramic veneers after 36 months. J Esthet Restor Dent, 25(1), 42-52. doi:10.1111/jerd.12000
Sadowsky, S. J. (2006). An overview of treatment considerations for esthetic restorations: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent, 96(6), 433-442. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.09.018
Schmidt, K. K., Chiayabutr, Y., Phillips, K. M., & Kois, J. C. (2011). Influence of preparation design and existing condition of tooth structure on load to failure of ceramic laminate veneers. J Prosthet Dent, 105(6), 374-382. doi:10.1016/s0022-3913(11)60077-2
Sheets, C. G., & Taniguchi, T. (1990). Advantages and limitations in the use of porcelain veneer restorations. J Prosthet Dent, 64(4), 406-411. doi:10.1016/0022-3913(90)90035-b
Smales, R. J., & Etemadi, S. (2004). Long-term survival of porcelain laminate veneers using two preparation designs: a retrospective study. Int J Prosthodont, 17(3), 323-326.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Jéssica Monique Lopes Moreno; Danila de Oliveira; Paulo Sergio Morais Sales; Caroline Liberato Marchiolli; Bruno Mendes Tenório; Ariane Rodrigues Barion; Ricardo Alves Toscano; Eduardo Passos Rocha; Wirley Gonçalves Assunção
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
