Analysis of scientific production on technology and innovation in agribusiness
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i5.15933Keywords:
Digital Technologies; Technological Innovation; Agribusiness; Meta-analytical approach.Abstract
The study aims to present the most recent literature on the theme of innovation and technology applied to agribusiness. The work consisted of carrying out an analysis of the scientific articles published in the Web of Science database in the period from 2016 to 2020. This is an exploratory research, with a quantitative approach, using the Consolidated Meta-Analytical Approach Theory, which provides an integrative approach to literature review. The results showed that 2,427 scientific articles, national and international, in several languages and in different areas of knowledge, adopted a simultaneous approach of the keywords innovation, technology and agribusiness, in the period from 2016 to 2020. Among these studies, 104 articles were highlighted by Brazilian researchers. The Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Universidade de São Paulo and Universidade Estadual Paulista were the Brazilian institutions that stood out the most in academic production, presenting works shared with Brazilian and foreign organizations, which contributed to the dissemination of knowledge on innovation and technology in agribusiness sector.
References
Albergoni, L & Pelaez, V. (2007). Da Revolução Verde à agrobiotecnologia: ruptura ou continuidade de paradigmas? Revista de Economia, 33(1), 31-53.
Alves, et al..(2019). Challenges and Innovations in Agribusiness Technology Based Incubators: A case study of Ineagro. Research, Society and Development, 8(5), e1985935.
Anderson et al.. (2016). Emerging agricultural biotechnologies for sustainable agriculture and food security. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 64(2), 383-393.
Ayodele et al.. (2019). Innovation as a mediating of relationship between internal and external environment in agribusiness performance. Маркетинг і менеджмент інновацій, 1(1), 196-207.
Artuzo et al.. (2017). Agricultura de precisão: inovação para a produção mundial de alimentos e otimização de insumos agrícolas. Revista Tecnologia e Sociedade, 13(29), 146-161.
Ball et al.. (2017). Visual soil evaluation: a summary of some applications and potential developments for agriculture. Soil and Tillage Research, 173(1), 114-124.
Bernardo et al.. (2018). A Produção do Conhecimento no Setor dos Agronegócios. HOLOS, 6(1), 16-33.
Bowen, R & Morris, W. (2019). The digital divide: Implications for agribusiness and entrepreneurship Lessons from Wales. Journal of Rural Studies, 72(1), 75-84.
Brancalion, P & Melis, J. (2017). On the Need for Innovation in Ecological Restoration. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 102(2), 227-236.
Carayannis et al.. (2018). Agri-science to agri-business: the technology transfer dimension. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(4), 837-843.
Chagwiza et al.. (2016). Cooperative membership and dairy performance among smallholders in Ethiopia. Food Policy, 59(1), 165-173.
Gonçalves et al.. (2018). Reflexões atualizadas sobre o contexto do agronegócio brasileiro. Revista Agroalimentaria, 24(46), 89-101.
Guedes, V & Borschiver, S. (2005). Bibliometria: uma ferramenta estatística para a gestão da informação e do conhecimento, em sistemas de informação, de comunicação e de avaliação científica e tecnológica. Encontro Nacional de Ciência da Informação, 6(1), 18.
Haberli et al.. (2017). Understanding the determinants of adoption of enterprise resource planning (ERP) technology within the agri-food context: the case of the Midwest of Brazil. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 20(1030), 729-746.
Hall et al.. (2018). The paradox of sustainable innovation: the ‘Eroom’effect (Moore’s law backwards). Journal of Cleaner Production, 172(1), 3487-3497.
Harvey, D. (2012). O espaço como palavra-chave. GEOgraphia, 14(28), 8-39.
Leite, A & Batalha, M. (2016). Agricultura sustentável e cooperativismo: que possíveis links?. Interciência, 1(1), 660-667.
Luo et al.. (2017). Technological innovation in agricultural co-operatives in China: Implications for agro-food innovation policies. Food Policy, 73(1), 19-33.
Mariano, A & Rocha, M. (2017). Revisão da literatura: apresentação de uma abordagem integradora. (1 ed.). AEDEM International Conference.
Ministério da agricultura, pecuária e abastecimento , M.A.P.A. (2020). MINISTÉRIO DA AGRICULTURA, PECUÁRIA E ABASTECIMENTO. https://www.gov.br/agricultura/pt-br/assuntos/politica-agricola/todas-publicacoes-de-politica-agricola/agropecuaria-brasileira-em-numeros/abn-06-2020.pdf/view
Montoro et al.. (2019). Anaerobic co-digestion of sweet potato and dairy cattle manure: a technical and economic evaluation for energy and biofertilizer production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 226(1), 1082-1091.
Moretti, C. (2020). Investir em pesquisa agropecuária traz retorno para a sociedade brasileira. Política Agrícola, 1(1), 10-20.
Nobre et al.. (2016). Land-use and climate change risks in the Amazon and the need of a novel sustainable development paradigm. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(1), 10759-10768.
Pereira et al.. (2016). Assessing the diversity of values and goals amongst Brazilian commercial-scale progressive beef farmers using Q-methodology. Agricultural Systems, 144(1), 1-8.
Rumpel et al.. (2020). The 4p1000 initiative: Opportunities, limitations and challenges for implementing soil organic carbon sequestration as a sustainable development strategy. Ambio, 49(1), 350-360.
Santos et al.. (2020). O Ecossistema Brasileiro de Pesquisa Agrícola: uma trajetória evolucionária em CT&I. Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Desenvolvimento Regional, 16(2), 79-88.
Souza et al.. (2017). The role of bioenergy in a climate-changing world. Environmental development, 23(1), 57-64.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Isabel Cristina dos Santos; Glaucia Bambirra Silveira; Renato Emanuel Gomes da Silva
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
