Factors that influence the longevity of direct restorations: An integrative review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i7.16114Keywords:
Permanent dental restoration; Longevity; Dental materials.Abstract
Composite resin is one of the most used dental materials by professionals, aiming at the search for aesthetic and functional restoration of the teeth. In this context, this study aimed to verify the factors that influence the longevity of direct restorations. An integrative literature review was performed, in which the bibliographic survey was performed through consultation in databases of relevance to the production of health knowledge: PubMed / Medline and SCIELO, in Portuguese and English, in full, between January 2009 and January 2019, totaling 20 articles. According to the researched articles, fractures are reported in almost 100% of the studies as a reason for failure of composite resin restorations, followed by secondary caries and lack of hygiene by the patient. Regarding the main factors for resin longevity, studies show that the choice of material, the size of the cavity, the use of barrier material to prevent oral pathogens (absolute isolation), the need for proper polishing and finishing. and above all, the implementation of a regular prophylaxis program. Therefore, it should be borne in mind that efforts for diagnosis, planning, treatment indication, correct procedure execution, observation of occlusal aspects, biofilm control and follow-up are essential to obtain results aimed at direct restoration longevity.
References
Arunpraditkul, S., Saengsanon, S., Pakviwat, W. (2009). Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth: three walls versus four walls of remaining coronal tooth structure. J. Prosthod., Philadelphia, 18(1): 49–53.
Baldissera, R. A. et al. (2013). Are there universal restorative composites for anterior and posterior teeth?. Journal of dentistry, 41(11): 1027-1035.
Camacho, G.B. et al. (2013). Avaliação da rugosidade superficial de resinas compostas expostas a diferentes agentes. Revista de Odontologia da UNESP; 37(3), 211-216.
Casagrande, L. et al. (2017). Longevity and associated risk factors in adhesive restorations of young permanent teeth after complete and selective caries removal: a retrospective study. Clin Oral Investig. 21(3):847–55.
Correa, M. B. et al. (2012). Amalgam or composite resin? Factors influencing the choice of restorative material. Journal of Dentistry, 40(9): 703-710.
Estay, J. et al. (2018). 12 years of repair of amalgam and composite resins: a clinical study. Operative dentistry, 43(1): 12-21.
Fernández, E. et al. (2015). Can repair increase the longevity of composite resins? Results of a 10-year clinical trial. Journal of dentistry, 43 (2): 279-286.
Heintze, S. D., Rousson, V. (2012). Clinical effectiveness of direct class II restorations-a meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent, 14(5): 407-31.
Kohli, A. et al. (2019). Assessment of longevity of composite and amalgam restorations in posterior teeth of paediatric patients: A comparative study. Journal of Advanced Medical and Dental Sciences Research, 7(1): 25-27.
Krämer, N. et al. (2009). Nanohybrid vs. fine hybrid composite in Class II cavities: clinical results and margin analysis after four years. Dental Materials, 25(6): 750-759.
Laske, M. et al. (2016). Longevity of direct restorations in Dutch dental practices. Descriptive study out of a practice based research network. J Dent. 46(1): 12–7.
Lawson, N. C., Gilbert, G.H., Funkhouser, E., Eleazer, P. D., Benjamin, P.L. & Worley, D. C. (2015). General dentists’ use of isolation techniques during root canal treatment: from the national dental practicebased research network. Journal of Endodontics; 41(8): 1219-1225.
Massano, G. et al. (2019). Direct Composite Restorations of Anterior Teeth: A Retrospective Clinical Study. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, 21(5);1-9.
Opdam, N. J. M. et al. (2010). 12-year survival of composite vs. amalgam restorations. Journal of dental research, 89(10), 1063-1067.
Pallesen, U. & Van Dijken, J. W. (2015). A randomized controlled 27 years follow up of three resin composites in Class II restorations. J Dent. Dec; 43(12):1547-58.
Pazinatto, F.B. et al. (2012). 56-month clinical performance of Class I and II resin composite restorations. Journal of Applied Oral Science, 20(3): 323-328.
Pereira A. S. et al. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. [free e-book]. Santa Maria/RS. Ed. UAB/NTE/UFSM.
Rodolpho, P. A. R. et al. (2017). Longevidade de restaurações extensas de resina composta em dentes posteriores. Clínica - International Journal of Brazilian Dentistry, Florianópolis; 13(3): 228-237, jul./set.
Rodolpho, P. R. et al. (2011). 22-Year clinical evaluation of the performance of two posterior composites with different filler characteristics. Dental Materials, 27(10): 955-963.
Silveira, P. D. M. et al. (2016). Resistência à fratura de pré-molares com preparos extensos do tipo inlay submetidos a diferentes procedimentos restauradores. Oral Sciences, 3(1): 6-11.
Sunnegårdh-Grönberg, K. et al. (2009). Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden. Journal of dentistry, 37(9): 673-678.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Emerson de Sousa Pinheiro; Marcelly da Conceição Seixas Abreu Gomes; Susana Raquel dos Santos Ferreira; Camila Roxo Silva; Yasmin Silva Moreira de Lucena; Sâmia Moreira de Andrade; Matheus Hipólito do Nascimento; Evaldo Hipólito de Oliveira
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.