Study strategies used by medical students in the axis morphofunctional: A literature review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i7.16615Keywords:
Medical Education; Materia Medica Study Methods; Students; Learning.Abstract
Objective: Identify in the main databases the study methods used by students during the learning process in the disciplines of the morphofunctional axis. Methodology: This is an Integrative Literature Review (RIL) in which, through a specific and rigorous literature search in the following databases: Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences (LILACS), Scientific Electronic Library Online (SCIELO), Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC) and PubMed. Results: 154 articles were found in the databases. 116 articles were selected in PubMed, 27 extracted from the ERIC platform, 9 articles in Scielo and 2 articles from LILACS. After applying the eligibility criteria, 12 articles were included in the RIL. Being articles from 11 different countries, all in the English language. Conclusion: The results presented demonstrate that the forms of learning of medical students contribute and evolve together with the course and are closely linked to the environment in which they are exposed, being fundamental in the search and fixation of knowledge.
References
Baig, M., Tariq, S., Rehman, R., Ali, S., & Gazzaz, Z. J. (2016). Concept mapping improves academic performance in problem solving questions in biochemistry subject. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 32(4), 801.
Brasil. (2014). Diretrizes Curriculares Nacionais do Curso de Graduação em Medicina. Ministério Da Educação. http://portal.mec.gov.br/index.php?option=com_docman&view=download&alias=15514-pces116-14&category_slug=abril-2014-pdf&Itemid=30192
Chang, B. J. (2016). Problem-based learning in medical school: A student’s perspective. In Annals of Medicine and Surgery (Vol. 12, pp. 88–89). Elsevier Ltd.
Cheng, X., Ka Ho Lee, K., Chang, E. Y., & Yang, X. (2017). The “flipped classroom” approach: Stimulating positive learning attitudes and improving mastery of histology among medical students. Anatomical Sciences Education, 10(4), 317–327.
Chonkar, S. P., Ha, T. C., Chu, S. S. H., Ng, A. X., Lim, M. L. S., Ee, T. X., Ng, M. J., & Tan, K. H. (2018). The predominant learning approaches of medical students. BMC Medical Education, 18(1).
Ekwochi, U., Osuorah, D. C., Ohayi, S. A., Nevo, A. C., Ndu, I. K., & Onah, S. K. (2019). Determinants of academic performance in medical students: Evidence from a medical school in South-East Nigeria. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 10, 737–747.
Hernández-Torrano, D., Ali, S., & Chan, C. K. (2017). First year medical students’ learning style preferences and their correlation with performance in different subjects within the medical course. BMC Medical Education, 17(1).
Hu, Y., Gao, H., Wofford, M. M., & Violato, C. (2018). A longitudinal study in learning preferences and academic performance in first year medical school. Anatomical Sciences Education, 11(5), 488–495.
Husmann, P. R., & O’Loughlin, V. D. (2019). Another Nail in the Coffin for Learning Styles? Disparities among Undergraduate Anatomy Students’ Study Strategies, Class Performance, and Reported VARK Learning Styles. Anatomical Sciences Education, 12(1), 6–19.
Javaeed, A. (2018). Learning Disabilities and Medical Students. MedEdPublish, 7(3).
Joshi, A., Ganjiwale, J., Varma, J., Singh, P., Modi, J., & Singh, T. (2017). Qualitative assessment of learning strategies among medical students using focus group discussions and in-depth interviews. International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research, 7(5), 33.
Khanal, L., Giri, J., Shah, S., Koirala, S., & Rimal, J. (2019). Influence of learning-style preferences in academic performance in the subject of human anatomy: An institution-based study among preclinical medical students. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 10, 343–355.
Mariani, L. (2002). Learning strategies, teaching strategies and new curricular demands: A critical view. Perspectives a Journal Of TESOL-Italy, XXIX(2), 45–56.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., Altman, D., Antes, G., Atkins, D., Barbour, V., Barrowman, N., Berlin, J. A., Clark, J., Clarke, M., Cook, D., D’Amico, R., Deeks, J. J., Devereaux, P. J., Dickersin, K., Egger, M., Ernst, E., & Tugwell, P. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. In PLoS Medicine. Public Library of Science. 6(7), e1000097.
O’Mahony, S. M., Sbayeh, A., Horgan, M., O’Flynn, S., & O’Tuathaigh, C. M. P. (2016). Association between learning style preferences and anatomy assessment outcomes in graduate-entry and undergraduate medical students. Anatomical Sciences Education, 9(4), 391–399.
Ozer, M. A., Govsa, F., & Bati, A. H. (2017). Web-based teaching video packages on anatomical education. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 39(11), 1253–1261.
Paudel, K. R., Nepal, H. P., Shrestha, B., Panta, R., & Toth, S. (2018). Distribution and academic significance of learning approaches among pre-clinical medical students at Trinity School of Medicine, St Vincent and the Grenadines. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 15, 9.
Peeler, J., Bergen, H., & Bulow, A. (2018). Musculoskeletal Anatomy Education: Evaluating the Influence of Different Teaching and Learning Activities on Medical Students Perception and Academic Performance. Annals of Anatomy, 219, 44–50.
Perumal, V. (2018). A sectional anatomy learning tool for medical students: development and user–usage analytics. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 40(11), 1293–1300.
Silva, R. de A., Tavares, L. F., Lama, E. A. L., Silva, D. F. A. da, & Sousa, A. A. de. (2018). O eixo morfofuncional pelo uso da metodologia ativa PBL em uma faculdade de Medicina da Amazônia. | Revista Artigos.com.
Souza, M. T. de, Silva, M. D. da, & Carvalho, R. de. (2010). Integrative review: what is it? How to do it? Einstein (São Paulo), 8(1), 102–106.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Lucas Henrique de Amorim Lima; Wellington da Costa Nascimento; Larissa Navarro Barros; Sarah Lais Rocha; Robson José de Souza Domingues
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.