Intervention program using a robot for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i8.17512

Keywords:

Educational robot; autism spectrum disorder; social skills; interaction; communication skills; Educational robot; Autism spectrum disorder; Social skills; Interaction; Communication skills.

Abstract

This study investigated the effectiveness on social skills development of an educational intervention program for schoolchildren with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) using an educational robot. Over the period of a month, four boys with ASD, ranging in age from 7 to 14 years, participated in structured educational scenarios involving the robot “Edison”, which is in the form of a toy car, with the aid of a teacher/researcher. The behavior of the four boys during the sessions was recorded by an observer, using an observation form. The boys appeared to enjoy the intervention sessions, and a positive outcome was observed following interaction with the robot. Specifically, by the end of the month of intervention, all the boys showed improvement in social skills and cooperation skills and a reduction in untoward social behaviors. They showed an increase in eye contact, followed instructions and appeared to understand the social rules better, and in general their interaction with the teacher and with each other was enhanced. In conclusion, teachers can use robots in programs aimed at improving the social and communication skills of schoolchildren with ASD.

References

Bharatharaj, J. et al. (2017). Robot-assisted therapy for learning and social interaction of children with autism spectrum disorder. Robotics, 6(1), 4.

Boucher, J. (2009). The autistic spectrum. Characteristics, causes and practical issues. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Bruce, B. (2008), Learning at the Border: How Young People Use New Media for Community Action and Personal Growth. In Ch. Angeli& N. Valanides (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Panhellenic Conference with International Participation: ICT in Education. 25-28 September, Cyprus, pp.3-10.

Cabibihan, J.J., Javed, H., Ang, M.&Aljunied, S.M. (2013). Why Robots? A Survey on the Roles and Benefits of Social Robots in the Therapy of Children with Autism. Int. J. Soc. Robot., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 593–618

Dautenhahn, Κ. & Werry, I. (2004). Towards interactive robots in autism therapy: background, motivation and challenges.Pragmatics & Cognition. 12. 1-35. DOI:10.1075/pc.12.1.03dau.

Diehl, J.J. Schmitt, L.M. Villano, M.& Crowell, C.R. (2012). The Clinical Use of Robots for Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Critical Review. Res. Autism Spectrum Disorder, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 249–262

Gillberg, C.& Coleman, M. (2000). The biology of autistic syndromes. London: MacKeith Press

Gonela, E. (2006). Autism: Conundrum and reality. From the theoretically approach to the educational intervention. Athens: Odysseus.

Iacono, I. Lehmann, H. Marti, P. Robins, B. & Dautenhahn, K. (2011). Robots as social mediators for children with Autism - A preliminary analysis comparing two different robotic platforms. IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning (ICDL). DOI: 10.1109/DEVLRN.2011.6037322.

Kim, E.S. et al. (2013). Social robots as embedded reinforcers of social behavior in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43, 1038–1049.

Kozima, H. et al. (2007). Children-robot interaction: A pilot study in autism therapy. Progress in Brain Research, 164, 385–400.

Mitsea, E. &Lytra, N. &Akrivopoulou, A. &Drigas, A. (2020). Metacognition, Mindfulness and Robots for Autism Inclusion. International Journal of Recent Contributions from Engineering, Science & IT (iJES). 8. 4-19. DOI:10.3991/ijes.v8i2.14213.

Ntaountaki, P. Lorentzou, G. Lykothanasi, A. Anagnostopoulou, P. Alexandropoulou, V.&Drigas, A. (2019). Robotics in Autism Intervention. International Journal of Recent Contributions from Engineering Science & IT (iJES), 7. 4-17. DOI:10.3991/ijes.v7i4.11448.

Peca, A. Simut, R. Pintea, S. Costescu, C. &Vanderborght, B. (2014). How do typically developing children and children with autism perceive different social robots?. Computer. Human Behavior, vol. 41, pp. 268–277

Pivetti, M. Di Battista, S.Agatolio, F. Simaku, B. Moro, M. &Menegatti, E. (2020). Educational Robotics for children with neurodevelopmental disorders: A systematic review. in Heliyon. vol. 6, 10.

Pop, C.A. et al. (2014). Enhancing play skills, engagement and social skills in a play task in ASD children by using robot-based interventions. A pilot study. Interaction Studies, 15(2), 292–320.

Quill, K.A. (2000). Διδάσκοντας Αυτιστικά Παιδιά. Μετάφραση: Παγίδα Ρ. Αθήνα: Εκδόσεις ΕΛΛΗΝ

Ricks, D.& Colton, M. (2010). Trends and considerations in robot assisted autism therapy. Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. 4354 - 4359. DOI:10.1109/ROBOT.2010.5509327.

Saatcioglu, K.T.&Boru, B. (2015). Using educational robotics for students with learning difficulties.Conference ISITES papers. Spain: Valencia. pp. 2152- 2160.

Saerbeck, M. Schut, T. Bartneck, C. &Janse, M. D. (2010). Expressive robots in education. in: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems—CHI ’10 (pp. 1613–1622). Atlanta, GA: ACM Press.

Standen, P. Brown, D. Roscoe, J. Hedgecock, J. Stewart, D. Trigo, M. J. G. &Elgajiji, E. (2014). Engaging students with profound and multiple disabilities using humanoid robots. In C. Stephanidis& M. Antona (Eds.), Universal access in human-computer interaction. Universal access to information and knowledge (pp. 419–430). Heraklion: Springer International Publishing.

Stanton, C. M. et al. (2008). Robotic animals might aid in the social development of children with autism. In HRI 2008 – Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction: Living with Robots. (pp. 271–278).

Syriopoulou Delli, C., Gkiolnta, E. (2021). "Effectiveness of different types of Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) in improving communication skills and in enhancing the vocabulary of children with ASD: A review" Review Journal of Autism and Developmental DisordersDOI 10.1007/s40489-021-00269-4

Syriopoulou- Delli, C., Sarri, K. (2021). Video-Based Instruction in enhancing Functional Living Skills of adolescents and young adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A review. DOI: 10.1080/20473869.2021.1900504. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities.

Tapus, A. et al. (2012). Children with autism social engagement in interaction with Nao, an imitative robot: A series of single case experiments. Interaction Studies, 13(3), 315–347.

Villaronga, E.F. &Albo-Canals, J. (2019). “I’ll take care of you,” said the robot. Reflecting up on the legal and ethical aspects of the use and development of social robots for therapy,” Paladyn. Journal of behavioral robotics, vol.10, no. 1, pp. 77-93,

Werry, I. Dautenhahn, K. &Harwin, W. (2001). Evaluating the response of children with autism to a robot in: Simpson, R. (Eds.). USA: Resna Press. Arlington.

Wing, L. (1988). The continuum of autistic characteristics. In E. Schopler& G. B. Mesibow (Eds.), Diagnosis and assessment in autism (pp.91-110). New York Plenum Press.

Yun, S.S. Kim, H. Choi, J. and Park, S.K. (2016). A robot-assisted behavioral intervention system for children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 76, 58–67.

Zirpoli, T. J. (2005). Behavior management: Applications for teachers (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.

Downloads

Published

13/07/2021

How to Cite

SYRIOPOULOU-DELLI, C.; DERES, I.; DRIGAS, A. Intervention program using a robot for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder . Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 8, p. e35010817512, 2021. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v10i8.17512. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17512. Acesso em: 27 dec. 2024.

Issue

Section

Education Sciences