Scientific evidence on the performance of endodontic treatment in single session

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i8.17534

Keywords:

Endodontics; Root canal treatment; Standards of dental practice.

Abstract

This integrative review aimed to compare endodontic treatment in a single session with that carried out in multiple sessions, seeking scientific evidence regarding the reduction of postoperative complications such as pain, retreatment, reduction of bacteria and effectiveness of endodontic treatment in a single session. The study was carried out through a bibliographic survey in Pubmed and SciELO databases with manuscripts published between 2017 and 2021, using the following keywords: “Endodontics”; “Treatment of the Root Canal”; “Single session”, with the help of the Boolean operator “AND”. A total of 123 articles were found, where 39 were evaluated based on the inclusion criteria: Studies that evaluated endodontic treatment in a single session, studies published in the last 05 years, and as exclusion criteria: Articles not related to the topic, in addition to course completion papers, thesis and dissertations, resulting in 5 articles used for this review. The literature shows that the treatment of the root canal in a single session, performed with a good technique, brings efficient results, however, some studies have shown conflicting results. if that the techniques are operator-dependent. In elements with a high infection rate, the results are conflicting, with some sources presenting effective results with the treatment in a single session, regardless of the state of the approached element, and others presenting advantages in a multiple session approach, when it presents septic content. Thus, further clinical studies are needed to compare the two techniques, to determine clear indications for each of them.

References

AlRahabi MK. (2017). Predictors, prevention, and management of postoperative pain associated with nonsurgical root canal treatment: A systematic review. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. May 9;12(5):376-384. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2017.03.004. PMID: 31435267; PMCID: PMC6695063.

Berutti E, Chiandussi G, Paolino DS, Scotti N, Cantatore G, Castellucci A & Pasqualini D. (2012). Canal shaping with WaveOne Primary reciprocating files and ProTaper system: a comparative study. J Endod. Apr;38(4):505-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.12.040.

Boonchoo K, Leelataweewud P, Yanpiset K & Jirarattanasopha V. (2020). Simplify pulpectomy in primary molars with a single-file reciprocating system: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. Aug;24(8):2683-2689. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-03130-5.

Gavini Giulio SM, Caldeira CL, Machado MEL, Freire LG & Eglecias EF. (2018). Nickel–titanium instruments in endodontics: a concise review of the state of the art. Braz. oral res. 32(1): 67.

Manfredi M, Figini L, Gagliani M & Lodi G. (2016). Single versus multiple visits for endodontic treatment of permanent teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.Dec 1;12(12):CD005296. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005296.pub3. PMID: 27905673; PMCID: PMC6463951.

Melgaço-Costa JL, Martins RC, Ferreira EF & Sobrinho AP. (2016). Patients’ Perceptions of Endodontic Treatment as Part of Public Health Services: A Qualitative Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. Apr 27;13(5):450. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13050450. PMID: 27128932; PMCID: PMC4881075.

Moreira MS, Anuar ASN, Tedesco TK, Dos Santos M & Morimoto S. (2017). Endodontic Treatment in Single and Multiple Visits: An Overview of Systematic Reviews. J Endod. Jun;43(6):864-870. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.01.021.

Nascimento GG, Rabello DGD, Corazza BJM, Gomes APM, Silva EG & Martinho FC. (2021). Comparison of the effectiveness of single- and multiple-sessions disinfection protocols against endotoxins in root canal infections: systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. Jan 13;11(1):1226. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79300-3.

Palacios GB, Puché KM & Eyzaguirre AMP. (2020). Tratamiento endodóntico en una sesión comparado con múltiples sesiones en pacientes con dentición permanente. Int. j interdiscip. Dent., 13(3): 217-223. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S2452-55882020000300217.

Rossi-Fedele G, Kahler B & Venkateshbabu N. (2019). Limited Evidence Suggests Benefits of Single Visit Revascularization Endodontic Procedures - A Systematic Review. Braz Dent J. Nov-Dec;30(6):527-535. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201902670.

Sanjay M, Londhe SM & Sharma S. (2019). Single-visit versus dual-visit endodontics. A comparative Study. Indian Journal of Public Health and Development. July; 10(7). 244 - 250. doi: 10.598.

Schwendicke F & Göstemeyer G. (2017). Single-visit or multiple-visit root canal treatment: systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. BMJ Open. Feb 1;7(2):e013115. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013115. PMID: 28148534; PMCID: PMC5293988.

Souza MT, Silva MD & Carvalho R. (2010). Revisão integrativa: o que é e como fazer. Einstein (São Paulo), 8(1): 102-106.

Su Y, Wang C & Ye L. (2011). Healing rate and post-obturation pain of single- versus multiple-visit endodontic treatment for infected root canals: a systematic review. J Endod .Feb;37(2):125-32. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.09.005. Epub 2010 Nov 12. PMID: 21238790.

Sun C, Sun J, Tan M, Hu B, Gao X & Song J. (2018). Pain after root canal treatment with different instruments: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Dis. Sep;24(6):908-919. doi: 10.1111/odi.12854.

Tajonar, RSL, Chejin, LFC & Méndez, MF. (2017). Tratamento endodôntico em uma única sessão como única solução para uma lesão aparente do endoperium. Relato de um caso clínico. Vital Dentistry, (27), 29-34.

Triches TC, Zimmermann GS, de Freitas SFT, Ximenes M, Vieira RS & Cordeiro MMR. (2018). Efficacy of a single session protocol for endodontic treatment in primary teeth: in vivo study. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. Feb;19(1):47-55. doi: 10.1007/s40368-018-0325-0.

Wei X, Hu B, Peng H, Tang M & Song J. (2017). The incidence of dentinal cracks during root canal preparations with reciprocating single-file and rotary-file systems: A meta-analysis. Dent Mater J. May 31;36(3):243-252. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2016-208.

Wong AW, Zhang C & Chu CH. (2014). A systematic review of nonsurgical single-visit versus multiple-visit endodontic treatment. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. May 8;6:45-56. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S61487.

Wong AW, Zhang S, Li SK, Zhu X, Zhang C & Chu CH. (2015). Incidence of post-obturation pain after single-visit versus multiple-visit non-surgical endodontic treatments. BMC Oral Health . Aug 14;15:96. doi: 10.1186/s12903-015-0082-y. PMID: 26272704; PMCID: PMC4536791.

Published

15/07/2021

How to Cite

LUCENA, I. V. S. .; SILVA, H. F. V. da; SUASSUNA, F. C. M.; MONTENEGRO, L. de A. S. .; SILVA , T. V. S. da; LIMA , M. P. .; CRUZ, M. E. de A.; COSTA, B. J. de A. .; BARBOSA , J. da S. Scientific evidence on the performance of endodontic treatment in single session. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 8, p. e45210817534, 2021. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v10i8.17534. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17534. Acesso em: 16 nov. 2024.

Issue

Section

Health Sciences