Quality of life assessment with the SF-36 instrument during the COVID-19 pandemic: A pilot study

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i9.17596

Keywords:

Quality of life; Healthy volunteers; Surveys and questionnaires.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the quality of life of healthy volunteers through the SF-36 questionnaire by telephone contact during the COVID-19 pandemic in the city of Machado/MG. The SF-36 is a multidimensional questionnaire composed of 36 items, encompassed in eight scales or components: functional capacity, physical aspects, pain, general health status, vitality, social aspects, emotional aspects, mental health, and one more question comparing current health conditions to those of one year ago. It assesses both the negative aspects of health (illness or disease) and the positive aspects (well-being). 114 volunteers were interviewed between November 2020 and January 2021. Of these, 52 (45.6%) were female and 62 (54.4%) were male.  The mean age of the sample studied was 34.99 years (SD 12.01). Statistical analysis was done using the statistical program SPSS version 2.0. The independent t-test was used for the comparison of mean and standard deviation between genders and the domains of the SF-36 questionnaire, and Pearson's correlation coefficient classified the correlation as perfect (r=1), strong (r>0.75), moderate (r>0.5), weak (r<0.5) and non-existent (r=0). The significance level for the test was 5%. There was no significant difference between female and male sexes in the domains, but the emotional aspects stand out for presenting a higher mean in males and there was a significant difference between some domains when correlated, but with a weak positive linear Pearson correlation.

Author Biographies

Roberta de Oliveira e Silva, Universidade Federal de Alfenas; Centro de saúde especializado

Fisioterapeuta e Doutoranda em Universidade Federal de Alfenas (UNIFAL)

Docente em Centro Superior de Ensino e Pesquisa de Machado (CESEP)

Jéssica Naiara Pereira, Centro de saúde especializado

Aluna do 10º período de enfemagem do Centro Superior de Ensino e Pesquisa de Machado (CESEP)

Eliana Gazana Pereira Milan, Centro de saúde especializado

Aluna do 10º período de Enfermagem do Centro Superior de Ensino e Pesquisa de Machado (CESEP)

References

Adorno, M. L. G. R. & Brasil-Neto, J. P. (2013). Avaliação da qualidade de vida com o instrumento SF-36 em lombalgia crônica. Acta Ortop Bras, 21(4): 202-207.

Bashshur, R. (2020). Telemedicine and the COVID-19 pandemic, lessons for the future. Telemed J E Health, 26, 571-573.

Casonatto J. & Doederlein M. (2009). Post-exercise Hypotension: a Systematic Review. Rev Bras Med Esporte, Mar/Apr;15, 151-157.

Chatterjee S. (2020). Important Steps to Control COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 Infection.SN Compr Clin Med, 1–2.

Ciconelli, R. M et al. (1999). Tradução para a língua portuguesa e validação do questionário genérico de avaliação de qualidade de vida SF-36 (Brasil SF-36). Rev Bras Reumatol, 39(3), 143-50.

Cottrell, M. et al. (2021). Comparing fly-in fly-out and telehealth models for delivering advanced-practice physiotherapy services in regional Queensland: an audit of outcomes and costs. J. Telemed. Telecare. 27(1), 32-38.

Dalfovo, M. S.; Lana, R. A. & Silveira, A. Métodos quantitativos e qualitativos: um resgate teórico. Revista Interdisciplinar Científica Aplicada, Blumenau, 2(4), 01- 13.

Guirado, G. M. P. et al. (2021). Avaliação da qualidade de vida de trabalhadores antes e durante a pandemia de COVID-19 por meio do questionário SF-36 Rev. Gest. Sist. Saúde, São Paulo, 10(1), 84-105.

Hollander J. E. & Carr, B.G. (2020). Virtually perfect? Telemedicine for covid-19. N Engl JMed, 382, 1679-1681.

Mcintosh, K. (2020). Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCov) from https://www.uptodate.com/contents/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19

Ministério da Saúde. (2020). Secretaria de Atenção Especializada à Saúde (SAES). Departamento de Atenção Hospitalar, Domiciliar e de Urgência (DAHU). Protocolo de manejo clínico para o novo coronavírus (2019-nCoV). Brasília, 2020. From https://portalarquivos2.saude.gov.br/images/pdf/2020/fevereiro/11/protocolo-manejo-coronavirus

Moretti, S.A.; Guedes-Neta, M.L. & Batista, E. C. (2020). Nossas Vidas em Meio à Pandemia da COVID - 19: Incertezas e Medos Sociais. Rev Enfermagem e Saúde Coletiva, 4(2), 32-41.

Nelson, M. et al. (2019). Cost-effectiveness of telerehabilitation versus traditional care after total hip replacement: a trial-based economic evaluation. J. Telemed. Telecare. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X19869796, 1357633X19869796.

Oliveira, V. et al. (2020). COVID-19 e a Transformação Digital dos Cuidados de Saúde: “A Pastilha de Mentos na Coca-Cola Diet”. Gazeta Médica, 7(2).

Pastora-Bernal, J.M., Martín-Valero, R. & Barón-López, F.J. (2017). Cost analysis of telerehabilitation after arthroscopic subacromial decompression. J. Telemed. Telecare 24 (8), 553–559.

Poulter, N. R.; Prabhakaran D & Caulfield, M. (2015). Hypertension. Lancet 386, 801–812.

Rockwell, K. L. & Gilroy, A. S. (2020). Incorporating telemedicine as part of COVID-19 outbreak response systems. Am J Manag Care, 26, 147-148.

Tousignant, M. et al. (2015). Cost analysis of in-home telerehabilitation for post-knee arthroplasty. J. Med. Internet Res. 17 (3) https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3844 e83-e83.

Vetta, F.; Vetta, G. & Marinaccio, L. (2020). Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and cardiovascular disease: a vicious circle. J Cardiol Cardiovasc Res, 1, 1–12.

World Health Organization. (2020). Rolling updates on coronavirus disease (COVID-19) 2020. From https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIr9Ks562J6gIVTwmRCh1RbwgjEAAYASAAEgK_V_D_BwE

Zhang, Y., & Ma, Z. F. (2020). Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Mental Health and Quality of Life among Local Residents in Liaoning Province, China: A Cross-Sectional Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7), 2381.

Published

19/07/2021

How to Cite

SILVA, R. de O. e; PEREIRA, J. N. .; MILAN, E. G. P. Quality of life assessment with the SF-36 instrument during the COVID-19 pandemic: A pilot study. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 9, p. e17210917596, 2021. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v10i9.17596. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17596. Acesso em: 20 sep. 2021.

Issue

Section

Health Sciences