Prosthesis molding on implants / closed or open tray?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i10.18749

Keywords:

Dental implants; Open tray; Closed tray; Prothesis.

Abstract

The main objective of this study is: to increase knowledge about molding techniques in open and closed trays. As secondary objectives, it is proposed: to study about implant prostheses; characterize the distinctions between open and closed trays; expand knowledge about the most suitable situations for the use of each tray style (open or closed). The present study is a descriptive and qualitative bibliographic survey, using theoretical references extracted from books, scientific articles, monographs, theses, revised dissertations and electronic websites that portray the proposed theme. In recent years, the demand for the rehabilitation of tooth loss with implants has become popular. In the current stage of development that implant prostheses have reached, they are considered to be the best treatment options, being considered as a high standard within dental prostheses. The main objective of an implant prosthesis molding is to accurately record the positioning of the components in the mouth and soft tissues, as well as the structures adjacent to the edentulous space, thus using specific components for transfer, as well as metallic analogues of the present device. in the mouth, whether abutments or implants. Among the molding techniques we have the technique with open tray and with closed tray. Therefore, the choice between open or closed tray will be based on the characteristics of the components and rehabilitation that will be carried out. Both techniques have their advantages, however, each is indicated for specific cases. In this sense, the choice will be based on the individual demand of each patient.

References

Agarwal, S., Ashok, V., & Maiti, S. (2020). Open- or Closed-Tray Impression Technique in Implant Prosthesis: A Dentist's Perspective. Journal of long-term effects of medical implants, 30(3), 193–198. https://doi.org/10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2020035933

Amin, S., Weber, H. P., Finkelman, M., El Rafie, K., Kudara, Y., & Papaspyridakos, P. (2017). Digital vs. conventional full-arch implant impressions: a comparative study. Clinical oral implants research, 28(11), 1360–1367. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12994

Bezerra, R. M. et al. (1999). Microestrutura e resistência à corrosão do Ti c.p. soldado a laser utilizando em prótese sobre implantes. Elétrica Química, 24, 113-124.

Farias Neto, A., Carreiro, A. F. P. & Rizzatti-Barbosa, C. M. A. (2011). Prótese parcial removível no contexto da odontologia atual. Odontologia Clínico-Científica,10 (2), 125-8.

Fernandes JR., R. C. et al. (2014). Implantodontia: próteses totais fixas sobre implante com carga imediata em mandíbula. Revista de Iniciação Científica da Universidade Vale do Rio Verde, 4 (1), 76-93.

Gerhardt, T. E. & Silveira, D. T. (2009). Métodos de pesquisa. Editora da UFRGS.

Kim, K. R., Seo, K. Y., & Kim, S. (2019). Conventional open-tray impression versus intraoral digital scan for implant-level complete-arch impression. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 122(6), 543–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.10.018

Kono, T. T. L. D. V. (2014). Especialização em Odontologia (Monografia). Universidade Estadual de Campinas.

Liu, D. Y., Cader, F. N., Abduo, J., & Palamara, J. (2019). Accuracy of Different Implant Impression Techniques: Evaluation of New Tray Design Concept. Journal of prosthodontics: official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists, 28(2), e682–e687. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12733

Marotti, J., Tortamano, P. & Wolfart, S. (2012). Moldagem em implantodontia. Revista de Pós-Graduação, 19 (3), 113-21.

Mendes, L. G. A., Rohenkohl, J.H. & Mendes, M. O. A. (2010). Prótese sobre implantes: cimentada versus parafusada. Unoesc & Ciência, 1 (2), 157-164.

Pimenta, M. H. G., Silva, R. S. S. & Poluha, R. L. (2019). Moldagem Em Prótese Sobre Implante: Revisão De Literatura. Revista UNINGÁ, 56 (S5), 37-42.

Rocha, S. S. et. al. (2013). Próteses Totais Fixas Tipo Protocolo Bimaxilares. Relato de Caso. Revista Odontologia do Brasil Central, 21 (60), 21-7.

Santiago J. R. et al. (2010). Implantes dentais curtos: alternativa conservadora na reabilitação bucal. Revista de Cirurgia e Traumatologia Buco-maxilo-facial, 10 (2), 67-76.

Silva, M. M. et. al. (2008). Técnicas de moldagem em prótese sobre implantes. Revista de Odontologia da UNESP, 37 (4), 301-8.

Souza, S. C. et al. (2021). Análise comparativa entre diferentes técnicas de união de transferentes de moldagem utilizadas em prótese sobre implantes cone morse. Arch Health Invest, 10 (3), 461- 6.

Telles, D. (2009). Prótese total: convencional e sobre implantes. Santos.

Vargas, F. F. (2017). Especialização em Odontologia (Dissertação). Universidade Federal de Pelotas.

Wolfart, S., & Yilmaz, B. (2019). A technique for facilitating open-tray implant impressions. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 122(4), 417–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.06.017

Published

10/08/2021

How to Cite

ROCHA, P. N. da; COSTA, M. D. M. de A. .; DIETRICH, L. Prosthesis molding on implants / closed or open tray?. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 10, p. e265101018749, 2021. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v10i10.18749. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18749. Acesso em: 20 oct. 2021.

Issue

Section

Health Sciences