Analysis of the profile of brazilian fellowship researchers productivity in physiology: observational study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i10.18906Keywords:
Scientific production; Research productivity; Biological Science Disciplines; CNPq; Physiology.Abstract
In view of the devaluation of Brazilian education and science observed in recent years and considering the importance of Physiology as basic science it is necessary to carry out the general mapping of this area by analyzing the profile of productivity researchers fellows and, therefore, highlight possible discrepancies existing between the different levels of categories. This is an observational, descriptive study. Free access was made to the information contained on National Council for Scientific and Technological Development website for the identification of PQ fellows. We found 193 PQ fellowship in Physiology, 72% of which were located in the Southeast region. We also observed a predominance of male fellowships (54.9%). Regarding the distribution by public and private sectors, 94.8% were in the public service. Among the Institutions where the researchers were located, 6 of them are responsible for 52.4% of the PQ fellowships. When analyzing the total number of PG programs reposted in the Lattes, we found a total of 152 PG programs, of which 46 are in the area of CBII. We conclude that although researchers from all over the Brazilian territory may apply for a Productivity Grant, these are still concentrated in the Southeast region, thus revealing the disparity in distribution. We also highlight the distribution of fellowship by sex, indicating a predominance of males, especially at higher hierarchical levels. Based on our data, the most researchers are linked to only one graduate program and 27.6% of them are allocated to the area of Biological Science II.
References
Barata, R. B., & Goldbaum, M. (2003). Perfil dos pesquisadores com bolsa de produtividade em pesquisa do CNPq da área de saúde coletiva. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 19(6), 1863–1876. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2003000600031
BRASIL. (2019). MCTIC, Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovações e Comunicações. Retrieved August 28, 2019, from Produção Científica website: https://www.mctic.gov.br/mctic/opencms/indicadores/detalhe/Producao_Cientifica/Producao_Cientifica_5.5.html
BRASIL. (2021). Plataforma Sucupira. Retrieved January 12, 2021, from https://sucupira.capes.gov.br/sucupira/public/consultas/coleta/programa/quantitativos/quantitativoPrograma.xhtml?areaAvaliacao=8&areaConhecimento=20700008&cdRegiao=0&ies=338689
Cross, D., Thomson, S., & Sibclair, A. (2018). Research in Brazil: A report for CAPES by Clarivate Analytics. Clarivate Analytics.
Guedes, M. de C. (2014). Bolsas e bolsistas de produtividade do CNPq: Uma análise de gênero. Anais Eletrônicos Do 14 Seminário Nacional de História Da Ciência e Da Tecnologia. Presented at the Belo Horizonte, Campus Pampulha da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte, Campus Pampulha da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
Kamdem, Jean P., Abolaji, A. O., Roos, D. H., Calabró, L., Barbosa, N. V., Souza, D. O., & Rocha, J. B. T. (2016). Scientific Performance of Brazilian Researchers in Pharmacology with grants from CNPq: A comparative study within the Brazilian categories. Anais Da Academia Brasileira De Ciencias, 88(3 Suppl), 1735–1742. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201620150534
Kamdem, Jean Paul, Roos, D. H., Sanmi, A. A., Calabró, L., Abolaji, A. O., de Oliveira, C. S., … Rocha, J. B. T. (2019). Productivity of CNPq Researchers from Different Fields in Biomedical Sciences: The Need for Objective Bibliometric Parameters-A Report from Brazil. Science and Engineering Ethics, 25(4), 1037–1055. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-0025-5
Leite, A. C. F., & Neto, I. R. (2017). Perfil dos Bolsistas de Produtividade em Pesquisa do CNPq em Educação. Revista Brasileira de Ensino Superior, 3(4), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.18256/2447-3944.2017.v3i4.2350
Martelli-Junior, H., Martelli, D. R. B., Quirino, I. G., Oliveira, M. C. L. A., Lima, L. S., & Oliveira, E. A. de. (2010). Pesquisadores do CNPq na área de medicina: Comparação das áreas de atuação. Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, 56(4), 478–483. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-42302010000400024
Mello-Carpes, P. B., Abreu, A. R. de P., Staniscuaski, F., Souza, M. A., Campagnole-Santos, M. J., & Irigoyen, M. C. (2019). Actions developed by the Brazilian Physiological Society to promote women’s participation in science. Advances in Physiology Education, 43(2), 199–206. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00216.2018
Oliveira, E. A. de, Ribeiro, A. L. P., Quirino, I. G., Oliveira, M. C. L., Martelli, D. R., Lima, L. S., … Martelli-Junior, H. (2011). Pesquisadores do Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico na área de Cardiologia. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, 97(3), 186–193. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0066-782X2011005000086
Pereira, A. S., Shitsuka, D. M., Parreira, F. J., & Shitsuka, R. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa cientifica. [E-book grátis]. UFSM. Retrieved from https://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/handle/1/15824/Lic_Computacao_Metodologia-Pesquisa-Cientifica.pdf?sequence=1
Ranking de universidades—RUF 2019 | Folha. (2019). Retrieved August 3, 2021, from RUF: Ranking Universitário Folha website: //ruf.folha.uol.com.br/2019/ranking-de-universidades/principal/
Sacco, A. M., Valiente, L., Vilanova, F., Wendt, G. W., DeSousa, D. A., Koller, S. H., … Koller, S. H. (2016). Perfil dos Bolsistas de Produtividade em Pesquisa do CNPq atuantes em Psicologia no Triênio 2012-2014. Psicologia: Ciência e Profissão, 36(2), 292–303. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-3703002702015
Santos, N. C. F., Cândido, L. F. de O., & Kuppens, C. L. (2010). Produtividade em pesquisa do CNPq: Análise do perfil dos pesquisadores da Química. Química Nova, 33(2), 489–495. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-40422010000200044
Scarpelli, A. C., Sardenberg, F., Goursand, D., Paiva, S. M., & Pordeus, I. A. (2008). Academic trajectories of dental researchers receiving CNPq’s productivity grants. Brazilian Dental Journal, 19(3), 252–256. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402008000300014
Sturmer, G., Viero, C. C. M., Silveira, M. N., Lukrafka, J. L., & Plentz, R. D. M. (2013). Profile and scientific output analysis of physical therapy researchers with research productivity fellowship from the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, 17(1), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552012005000068
UNESCO. (2015). Relatório de Ciência da UNESCO - rumo a 2030: Visão Geral e Cenário Brasileiro. Retrieved January 18, 2021, from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000235407_por/PDF/235407por.pdf.multi
Wainer, J., & Vieira, P. (2013). Avaliação de bolsas de produtividade em pesquisa do CNPq e medidas bibliométricas: Correlações para todas as grandes áreas. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, 18(2), 60–78. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-99362013000200005
World University Rankings. (2020, August 25). Retrieved August 3, 2021, from Times Higher Education (THE) website: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2021/world-ranking
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Michelly Cardoso Silva; Josimari Melo DeSantana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
