Online course on public budget for technical-administrative employees of a federal public education institution
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i10.19123Keywords:
Distance education; Online course; Public budget; TeachingAbstract
The text aims to present the prototype development of a course in the virtual learning environment Moodle, aimed at Technical-Administrative Servers in Education (TAEs) who work at the Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), on public budget, with a focus on aspects of the University's budget. To achieve this objective, a documentary research was carried out, in which the institution's budget data, obtained through reports and budget laws, were analyzed. Empirical data were also collected from the TAEs, members of the UFSC staff, through a questionnaire applied with the support of the Google Drive forms tool. The questionnaire aimed to support the creation of the public budget online course for TAEs and, through it, we sought to understand the degree of interest of administrative technical servers in such a course and what, in the perception of these workers, it is important to be addressed. A focus group was also held with the civil servants who work in the Budget Superintendence and in the Accounting and Finance Department at UFSC. We sought to understand what the expectations are regarding what would be addressed in the online course and what these servers perceived as fundamental for teaching in order to qualify the work of the TAEs. As repercussions, it is highlighted that the PACO methodology, created by researchers at the Federal University of São Carlos, served as a guide for the creation of the course prototype. The course was applied and positively evaluated with indication of qualification of work with public budget at UFSC.
References
Almeida, M. de S. (2014). Elaboração de projeto, TCC, dissertação e tese: uma abordagem simples, prática e objetiva: Atlas.
Altoé, A. & Penati, M. M. (2006). O construtivismo e o construcionismo fundamentando a ação docente em ambiente informatizado. http://www.cns.uem.br/downl oad/tecnolocap4.pdf.
Berkun, S. (2000). The art of UI prototyping. https://scottberkun.com/essays/12-the-art-of-ui-prototyping.
Buchenau, M. & Suri, J. F. (2000). Experience Prototyping. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221441600_Experience_Prototyping.
Campos, C. J. G. (2004). Metodologia qualitativa e método clínico-qualitativo: um panorama geral de seus conceitos e fundamentos.
Flick, U. (2009). Introdução à Pesquisa Qualitativa. Artmed.
Gil, A. C. (2008). Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. Atlas.
Marconi, M. A. & Lakatos, E. M. (2003). Fundamentos da metodologia científica. Atlas.
Marconi, M. A., Lakatos, E. M. (2002). Técnicas de Pesquisa: planejamento e execução de pesquisas, elaboração, análise e interpretação de dados. Atlas.
Minayo, M. C. S. (2007). O desafio do conhecimento: pesquisa qualitativa em saúde. Hucitec.
Moodle (2021). Sítio Web de apoio à plataforma Moodle. https://docs.moodle.org/.
Moore, M. G. & Kearsley, G. (2008). Educação a distância: uma visão integrada. Cengage Learning.
Moreira, M. A. (2006). Mapas conceituais e Diagramas V. https://www.if.ufrgs.br/~moreira/Livro_Mapas_conceituais_e_Diagramas_V_COMPLETO.pdf.
Neris, V. P. de A., et al. (2007). PACO – A Framework for Planning Learning Activities Supported by Computers. Mackenzie.
Kenski, I. (2013). Educação e tecnologias: novo ritmo da informação. Papirus Editora.
Oliveira, K. M. de et al. (2007). O Uso de modelos e Múltiplos Protótipos na Concepção de Interface do Usuário. Revista Principia: divulgação científica e tecnológica do IFPB, 15, 15-29.
Paludo, A. V. (2013). Orçamento público, AFO e LRF. Elsevier.
Perry, G. T., Lima, I., Carvalho, F. A., Ramos, C. & Santos, M. (2019). Produção e disponibilização de recursos digitais na UFRGS – A experiência do NAPEAD/SEAD. Novas Tecnologias na Educação, 17, 109-121.
Piaget, J. (1990). Epistemologia genética. Martins Fontes.
Prodanov, C. C. & Freitas, E. C. de. (2013). Metodologia do trabalho científico: métodos e técnicas de pesquisa e do trabalho acadêmico. Feevale.
Rogers, Y., Sharp, H. & Preece, J. (2013). Design de interação: além da interação humano-computador. Bookman.
Rother, E. T. (2007). Revisão sistemática X revisão narrativa. Acta paulista de Enfermagem, 20(2).
Severino, A. J. (2007). Metodologia do trabalho científico. Cortez.
Silva, L. M. (2004). Contabilidade governamental: um enfoque administrativo. Atlas.
Souza, A. C. de, Fialho, F. & Otani, N. (2007). TCC: métodos e técnicas. Visual Books.
Stake, R. E. (1999). Investigación con estudio de casos. Ediciones Morata.
Valente, J. A. (2014). Blended Learning e as Mudanças no Ensino Superior: a proposta da sala de aula invertida. Educar em Revista (Impresso), v79-97.
Yin, R. K. (2001). Estudo de caso: planejamento e métodos. Bookman.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Juliana Novo Paccola Yukimura; Nilo Otani; Roberta Pasqualli
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
