Industry 4.0 and Society 5.0: comparative views

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i11.19192

Keywords:

Industry 4.0; Society 5.0; Automation; Comparation; Technology.

Abstract

Organizations have been introduced to a new form of productive organization, called Industry 4.0, with the promise of integrating their processes, high customization, high production and reduced production costs. Based on the concepts of Industry 4.0, several variations emerged, such as Logistics 4.0, Health 4.0, and Agriculture 4.0. However, it was in Japan that the idea Society 5.0 emerged, which promises the application of all aspects of the fourth revolution and its consequences in a fully autonomous society. The present work compares Industry 4.0 and Society 5.0 in relation to origin, structuring elements and use of technology. The methodology used was a bibliographical research. The result presents a list of 10 characteristics that compare the year of creation of the concept, country of origin, motivating need, level of urgency, focus, scope of application, use of technology, degree of use of artificial intelligence, fundamental elements and developments from the concept. Contributions to the practice are based on the establishment of differences that can contribute so that strategists, investors and production managers can understand the differences and envision a near future.

Author Biographies

Irapuan Glória Júnior, University Paulista

Graduated in Systems Analysis (USF), postgraduate in Internet Consulting (FASP), MBA in Marketing Administration (UniSantanna), Master in Project Management Administration (UniNove), Ph.D. and post-doctorate in Production Engineering (UNIP). In the academic environment, he is a postgraduate professor at SENAC (MBA in Project Management) and UNIP (MBA in Information Security) and an undergraduate professor at the Faculty of Technology (FATEC) and at Universidade Paulista (UNIP). He acts as Coordinator of the Information Security Course at Fatec Santana de Parnaíba. He is a speaker on new methods for developing commercial systems and Digital Games using the Canvas approach, Industry 4.0 and Scrum. He has experience in project management, working mainly on the following topics: IT project management, fourth industrial revolution, IT project risks, systems integration and stakeholders.

João Gilberto Mendes dos Reis, University Paulista

Degree in Logistics Technology with emphasis on Transport at the East Zone Technology Faculty - Centro Paula Souza (2005), Master in Production Engineering at Paulista University (2008) and PhD in Production Engineering at Paulista University (2011). He has a postdoctoral internship at Universidade Paulista (2014) and Universidade do Porto (2016). He has experience in Production Engineering and Logistics, working in several companies in the transport and logistics sector. Coordinator of Grupo Pesquisa RESUP has developed several researches and works on transport, supply networks and quality in several industrial and agro-industrial chains

References

AI HLEG. (2019). High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence: Ethics Guidelines For Trustworthy AI. 1–41.

Andrade, N., Costa Neto, P. L. O., Torres, J. G. M., Glória Júnior, I., Scheidt, C. G., & Gazel, W. (2019). E-Health: A framework proposal for interoperability and health data sharing. A Brazilian Case. IFIP International Conference on Advances in Production Management Systems, 1, 544–551.

Badri, A., Boudreau-Trudel, B., & Souissi, A. S. (2018). Occupational health and safety in the industry 4.0 era: A cause for major concern? Safety Science, 109, 403–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.06.012

COG. (2019). Cabinet Office Government of Japan: Automatic Driving. https://www.gov-online.go.jp/cam/s5/eng/#sceneModal14

COJ. (2013). Cabinet Office of Japan: Social Principles of Human-Centric AI. 1–15.

CSPH-AI. (2019). Council for Social Principles of Human-centric AI: Social Principles of Human-Centric AI. https://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp /english/humancentricai.pdf

Ford, M. (2016). Industry 4.0: Making the First Move. Surface Mount Technology, 31(7), 30–36.

Fukuda, K. (2019). Science, technology and innovation ecosystem transformation toward society 5.0. International Journal of Production Economics.

Glória Júnior, I., Moraes, M. O., Araújo, M. B., & Torres, J. G. M. (2017). Engenharia da Produção—Tecnologia & Informação—Vol.2. PerSe.

Glória Júnior, I., & Reis, J. G. M. dos. (2021). Logística 4.0 e Inteligência Artificial na Sociedade 5.0. 1–13.

GOJ. (2019). Society 5.0 [Government of Japan]. Government of Japan - Public Relations Office - Society 5.0. https://www.gov-online.go.jp/cam/s5/eng/#sceneModal13

Kotler, P. (2012). Marketing 3.0. As forças que estão definindo o novo marketing centrado no ser humano. Elsevier.

Kotler, P. (2013). Administração de Marketing. Pearson.

Kuziemsky, C., Maeder, A. J., John, O., Gogia, S. B., Basu, A., Meher, S., & Ito, M. (2019). Role of Artificial Intelligence within the Telehealth Domain: Official 2019 Yearbook Contribution by the members of IMIA Telehealth Working Group. 28, 35–40. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1677897

Martins, G. de A., & Theóphilo, C. R. (2009). Metodologia da Investigação Científica Para Ciências Sociais Aplicadas (2a ed). Atlas.

Monteleone, S., de Moraes, E. A., & Maia, R. F. (2019). Analysis of the variables that affect the intention to adopt Precision Agriculture for smart watermanagement in Agriculture 4.0 context. 2019 Global IoT Summit (GIoTS), 1–6.

Nilsson, N. J. (2009). The quest for artificial intelligence. Cambridge University Press.

Patton, M. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice (4a ed). SAGE Publications.

Petroni, B. C. A., Glória Júnior, I., & Gonçalves, R. F. (2017). Impacto da Internet das Coisas na indústria 4.0: Uma Revisão Sistemática da Literatura. 1–6.

Poli, G. A., Saviani, T. N., & Glória Júnior, I. (2018). Logistica 4.0: Uma Revisão Sistemática. 1, 100–110.

Porter, M. E. (2005). Estratégia Competitiva—Técnicas Para Análise de Indústrias e da Concorrência. GEN Atlas.

Rübmann, M., Lorenz, M., Gerbert, P., Waldner, M., Justus, J., Engel, P., & Harnisch, M. (2015). Industry 4.0: The future of productivity and growth in manufacturing industries. http://www.inovasyon.org/pdf/bcg.perspectives_Industry.4.0_2015.pdf

Sacomano, J. B., Gonçalves, R. F., Bonilla, S. H., da Silva, M. T., & Sátyro, W. C. (2018). Indústria 4.0. Editora Blucher.

Schwaber, K. (2018). A quarta revolução industrial. Edipro.

Shiroishi, Y., Uchiyama, K., & Suzuki, N. (2018). Society 5.0: For human security and well-being. Computer, 51(7), 91–95.

Slack, N., Chambers, S., & Johnston, R. (2015). Administração da produção (Vol. 4). Atlas.

Stone, P., Brooks, R., Brynjolfsson, E., Calo, R., Etzioni, O., Hager, G., Hirschberg, J., Kalyanakrishnan, S., Kamar, E., Kraus, S., Leyton-Brown, K., Parkes, D., Press, W., Saxenian, A., Shah, J., Tambe, M., & Teller, A. (2016). Artificial Intelligence and Life 2030. One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence: Report of the 2015-2016 Study Panel. 52.

Zambon, I., Cecchini, M., Egidi, G., Saporito, M. G., & Colantoni, A. (2019). Revolution 4.0: Industry vs. Agriculture in a future development for SMEs. Processes, 7(1), 1–36.

Zhou, K., Liu, T., & Zhou, L. (2015). Industry 4.0: Towards future industrial opportunities and challenges. 2147–2152.

Published

22/08/2021

How to Cite

GLÓRIA JÚNIOR, I.; REIS, J. G. M. dos. Industry 4.0 and Society 5.0: comparative views. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 11, p. e23101119192, 2021. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v10i11.19192. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19192. Acesso em: 25 sep. 2022.

Issue

Section

Exact and Earth Sciences