Current adhesive systems and main challenges in adhesion: narrative review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i10.19206Keywords:
Dentin-Bonding Agents; Longevity; Physical and chemical properties.Abstract
Adhesion is the force that allows substances or substrates of different compositions to remain united as they are in close contact. Dental substrates have very different characteristics and are complex to understand when submitted to adhesive systems, which is the main challenge that dentists have faced in restorative dentistry. Considering that there is a great deficiency in the professional's knowledge regarding the techniques, indications and properties of dental adhesives, the objective of this narrative literature review was to clarify the classification and current aspects of adhesive systems, in addition to pointing out the main challenges that the clinician can face come across during the process of adhesion to dental tissues. Currently, adhesive systems are classified as conventional, self-etching and universal. Factors such as selective enamel conditioning when using self-etching systems and the use of adhesive systems that contain functional monomers that favor chemical adhesion to dentin substrate are interesting for increasing bond strength. The literature points to factors that negatively impact bond strength, such as the use of hemostatic solutions, patients who received radiotherapy, carious dentin and sclerotic dentin.
References
Ahmed. M. H., et al (2020). Quick bonding using a universal adhesive. Clinical oral investigations. 24(8). 2837-2851.
Althaqafi. K. A., et al (2020). A review and current state of autonomic self-healing microcapsules-based dental resin composites. Dental Materials. 36(3).329-342.
Arid. J., et al (2020). Radiotherapy impairs adhesive bonding in permanent teeth. Supportive Care in Cancer. 28(1). 239-247.
Bedran-Russo. A., et al (2017). An overview of dental adhesive systems and the dynamic tooth–adhesive interface. Dental Clinics. 61(4). 713-731.
Cadenaro. M., et al (2019). The role of polymerization in adhesive dentistry. Dental Materials. 35(1). e1-e22.
Caldas. I. P., et al (2019). In vitro cytotoxicity of dental adhesives: A systematic review. Dental Materials. 35(2). 195-205.
Cardoso. G., et al (2019). Bond stability of universal adhesives applied to dentin using etch-and-rinse or self-etch strategies. Brazilian dental journal. 30. 467-475.
Carrilho. E., et al (2019). 10-MDP based dental adhesives: Adhesive interface characterization and adhesive stability—A systematic review. Materials. 12(5). 790.
Christopher. A., et al (2018). Effect of enamel deproteinization in primary teeth. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 42(1). 45-49.
Cunha. S. R., et al (2020). In vivo and in vitro radiotherapy increased dentin enzymatic activity. Journal of Dentistry. 100. 103429.
De Lima. J. F. M., et al (2018). Effect of adhesive mode and chlorhexidine on microtensile strength of universal bonding agent to sound and caries-affected dentins. European journal of dentistry. 12(04). 553-558.
De Oliveira. B. K., et al (2014). The influence of hemostatic agents on dentin and enamel surfaces and dental bonding: A systematic review. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 145(11). 1120-1127.
Groddeck. S., et al (2017). Effect of cavity contamination by blood and hemostatic agents on marginal adaptation of composite restorations. J. Adhes. Dent. 19. 259-264.
Gupta. N., et al (2015). Effect of saliva on the tensile bond strength of different generation adhesive systems: an in-vitro study. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR. 9(7). ZC91.
Hashimoto. M., et al (2009). Effect of dentinal water on bonding of self-etching adhesives. Dental materials journal. 28(5). 634-641.
Hass. V., et al (2019). Bonding performance of universal adhesive systems applied in etch-and-rinse and self-etch strategies on natural dentin caries. Operative dentistry. 44(5). 510-520.
Isolan. C. P., et al (2018). Bonding to sound and caries-affected dentin: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent. 20(1). 7-18.
Kalavacharla. V. K., et al (2015). Influence of etching protocol and silane treatment with a universal adhesive on lithium disilicate bond strength. Operative Dentistry. 40(4). 372-378.
Kermanshah. H., et al (2010). Effect of salivary contamination during different bonding stages on shear dentin bond strength of one-step self-etch and total etch adhesive. Journal of Dentistry. 7(3). 132.
Kwansirikul. A., et al (2020). Effect of different surface treatments of human occlusal sclerotic dentin on micro‐tensile bond strength to resin composite core material. European journal of oral sciences. 128(3). 263-273.
López-Luján. N. A., et al (2019). Deproteinization of primary enamel with sodium hypochlorite before phosphoric acid etching. Acta odontol. latinoam. 29-35.
Matos. A. B., et al (2017). Bonding efficiency and durability: current possibilities. Brazilian oral research. 31.
Meerbeek. B. V., et al (2020). From Buonocore's Pioneering Acid-Etch Technique to Self-Adhering Restoratives. A Status Perspective of Rapidly Advancing Dental Adhesive Technology. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 22(1).
Meraji. N., et al (2018). Bonding to caries affected dentine. Dental Materials. 34(9). e236-e245.
Muñoz. M. A., et al (2020). The adverse effects of radiotherapy on the structure of dental hard tissues and longevity of dental restoration. International journal of radiation biology. 96(7). 910-918.
Nagarkar. S., et al (2019). Universal dental adhesives: Current status, laboratory testing, and clinical performance. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials.107(6). 2121-2131.
Perdigão. J., (2020). Current perspectives on dental adhesion:(1) Dentin adhesion–not there yet. Japanese Dental Science Review.
Perdigão. J., et al (2021). Adhesive dentistry: Current concepts and clinical considerations. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 33(1). 51-68.
Reis, A., & Loguercio. A. D (2021). Materiais dentários diretos: dos fundamentos à aplicação clínica. 2ª ed. Santos.
Rodrigues. R. B., et al (2018). Influence of radiotherapy on the dentin properties and bond strength. Clinical oral investigations. 22(2). 875-883.
Sofan. E., et al (2017). Classification review of dental adhesive systems: from the IV generation to the universal type. Annali di stomatologia. 8(1). 1.
Strauch. S. & Hahnel. S., (2018). Restorative treatment in patients with amelogenesis imperfecta: A review. Journal of Prosthodontics. 27(7). 618-623.
Sundfeld. D., et al (2020). Molar Incisor Hypomineralization: Etiology, Clinical Aspects, and a Restorative Treatment Case Report. Operative dentistry. 45(4). 343-351.
Troconis. C. M., et al (2017). Impact of head and neck radiotherapy on the mechanical behavior of composite resins and adhesive systems: A systematic review. Dental Materials. 33(11). 1229-1243.
Van Landuyt. K. L., et al (2007). Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials. 28(26). 3757-3785.
Yao. C., et al (2019). Bonding to enamel using alternative enamel conditioner/etchants. Dental Materials. 35(10). 1415-1429.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Lorena dos Santos Rodrigues; Paula Sampaio de Mello Assis; Adolfo Coutinho Martins; Nathalia Silveira Finck
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
