Evaluation of surface roughness of restorative dental composites: influence of depth cure, time and storage medium
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i11.19323Keywords:
Composite resins; Polymerization; Surface properties.Abstract
Bulk-Fill resin composites have gained popularity because their incremental insertion of up to 5.0 mm thickness, achieved through the composition, allowing an adequate degree of conversion. The reduced degree of conversion may alter the properties of dental composites as well as surface roughness. To evaluate the influence of polymerization depth, time and storage media on the hydrolytic degradation of restorative dental composites using surface roughness test. Twenty specimens were prepared for each material (Filtek Z250 XT, Filtek Bulk Fill e Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill) using two matrices with a central cavity of 5.0 mm in diameter and a thickness of 2.0 mm. 10 p.s. for each immersion medium (water and ethanol 75%) and depth of polymerization of 2.0 and 4.0 mm, for evaluation of surface roughness. After each storage period (24 hours, 90 days and 180 days) the surface roughness analysis was performed in Profilometer. After 24 hours and 90 days of storage, Filtek Z250 showed increased roughness with increasing polymerization depth. Filtek Bulk Fill showed significantly higher surface roughness when compared to Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill in all storage periods and immersion media. After 180 days, there was an increase of roughness for all materials, depths and storage medium evaluated. All materials show an increase in the surface roughness over time, probably due to hydrolytic degradation.
References
Alshali, R. Z., Salim, N. A., Satterthwaite, J. D. & Silikas, N. (2015). Post-irradiation hardness development, chemical softening, and thermal stability of bulk-fill and conventional resin-composites. J Dent, 43(2), 209-218.
Arbildo-Vega, H. I., Lapinska, B., Panda, S., Lamas-Lara, C., Khan, A. S., & Lukomska-Szymanska, M. (2020). Clinical Effectiveness of Bulk-Fill and Conventional Resin Composite Restorations: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Polymers, 12(8), 1786
Boaro, L.C. et al. (2013). Sorption, solubility, shrinkage and mechanical properties of "low-shrinkage" commercial resin composites. Dent Mater., 29(4), 398-404.
Cruz, J. et al. (2016). Análise da rugosidade de superfície e da microdureza de 6 resinas compostas. Revista Portuguesa de Estomatologia, Medicina Dentária e Cirurgia Maxilofacial, 57(1), 38–45.
Czasch, P. & Ilie, N. (2013). In vitro comparison of mechanical properties and degree of cure of bulk fill composites. Clin Oral Investig., 17(1), 227-235.
Da Costa, J. B., Goncalves, F. & Ferracane J. L. (2011). Comparison of two-step versus four-step composite finishing/polishing disc systems: evaluation of a new two-step composite polishing disc system. Oper Dent., 36(2), 205-212.
Delaviz, Y., Finer, Y. & Santerre, J. P. (2014). Biodegradation of resin composites and adhesives by oral bacteria and saliva: a rationale for new material designs that consider the clinical environment and treatment challenges. Dent Mater, 30(1), 16-32.
Dos Santos, P. H., et al. (2011). Effect of fluid resins on the surface roughness and topography of resin composite restorations analyzed by atomic force microscope. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 4(3), 433-439.
Ferracane J. L (2011). Resin composite – state of the art. Dent Mater, 27(1), 29-38.
Fronza, B. M. et al. (2015). Monomer conversion, microhardness, internal marginal adaptation, and shrinkage stress of bulk-fill resin composites. Dent Mater, 31(12), 1542-51.
Fronza, B. M. et al. (2017). Characterization of Inorganic Filler Content, Mechanical Properties, and Light Transmission of Bulk-fill Resin Composites. Oper Dent., 42(4), 445-455.
Gonçalves, F., et al. (2018). A comparative study of bulk-fill composites: degree of conversion, post-gel shrinkage and cytotoxicity. Brazilian Oral Research, 32(0), 1–9.
Han, J. M. et al. (2014). Abrasive wear and surface roughness of contemporary dental composite resin. Dent Mater J., 33(6), 725-732.
Hosoya, Y., et al. (2011). Effects of polishing on surface roughness, gloss, and color of resin composites. J Oral Sci., 53(3), 283-291.
Leprince, J.G. et al. (2014). Physico-mechanical characteristics of commercially available bulk-fill composites. J Dent, 42(8), 993-1000.
Lima, R. B. W., Troconis, C. C. M., Moreno, M. B. P., Murillo-Gómez, F. & De Goes, M. F. (2018). Depth of cure of bulk fill resin composites: A systematic review. J Esthet Restor Dent., 30(6), 492-501.
O'Neill C et al. (2018). Effect of tooth brushing on gloss retention and surface roughness of five bulk-fill resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent., 30(1), 59-69.
Ortengren, U., Wellendorf, H., Karlsson, S. & Ruyter, I. E (2001). Water sorption and solubility of dental composites and identification of monomers released in an aqueous environment. J Oral Rehabil. 28(12), 1106-1115.
Sirin Karaarslan, E., et al. (2013). Effects of different polishing methods on color stability of resin composites after accelerated aging. Dent Mater J., 32(1), 58-67.
Sunbul, H. A., Silikas, N. & Wattas, D. C. (2016). Surface and bulk properties of dental resin-composites after solvent storage. Dental Materials, 32(8), 987-997.
Tiba, A., Zeller, G. G., Estrich C. G. & Hong, A. A (2013). Laboratory evaluation of bulk-fill versus traditional Multi-increment-Fill Resin Based Composites. J Am Dent Assoc, 144(10), 1182-1183.
Wei, Y. J., Silikas, N., Zhang, Z. T. & Watts, D. C. (2011). Diffusion and concurrent solubility of self-adhering and new resin-matrix composites during water sorption/desorption cycles. Dent Mater, 27(2), 197-205.
Yap, A. U., Pandya, M. & Toh, W. S. (2016). Depth of cure of contemporary bulk-fill resin-based composites. Dent Mater J., 35(3), 503-510.
Zankuli, M. A., Devlin, H. & Silikas, N. (2014). Water sorption and solubility of core build-up materials. Dent Mater, 30(12), 324-329.
Zorzin, J. et al. (2015). Bulk-fill resin composites: polymerization properties and extended light curing. Dent Mater., 31(3), 293-301.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Beatriz Araújo Suassuna Vaz; Renally Bezerra Wanderley e Lima; Ana Karina Maciel de Andrade; Sônia Saeger Meireles ; Fábia Danielle Sales Cunha Medeiros e Silva; Laryssa Mylenna Madruga Barbosa; João Vitor do Nascimento Santos; Hermano Nóbrega Macedo Neto; Rosângela Marques Duarte

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.