A systematic literature review: analysis of structural inequality due to dengue cases and its influence on the Brazilian scenario
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i11.19355Keywords:
Influence; Structural inequality; Dengue cases; Precarious regions.Abstract
Currently, the high incidence of dengue is related to structural inequality and the lack of basic sanitation found in various precarious environments, in which families live in susceptible situations. This work aims to analyze the occurrence of dengue cases in the period from 2015 to 2020, as well as to determine an association of how socioeconomic factors such as inadequate housing, minimum income, family agglomerations, household densities and the lack of basic sanitation, have potential to influence the spread of the disease. This study aimed to present a systematic review of previously published academic papers on the focus of dengue in people's lives and the danger it poses to the population. The results found showed a positive incidence in the correlation with the social factors mentioned, thus favoring the proliferation of Aedes aegypti.
References
Acselrad, H., Mello, C. C. A. & Bezerra, G. A. N. (2008). O que é justiça ambiental. Garamond. p.78.
Almeida, L. S., Cota, A. L. S. & Rodrigues, D. F. (2020). Sanitation, Arboviruses, and environmental Determinants of Disease: impacts on urban health. Ciencia & Saude Coletiva, 25, 3857.
Alves, M. Dos S., Araújo, W. C., Silva, F. A. M. Da. (2021). Analysis on the preponderance that structural inequality causes in health and in the frequency of dengue cases. Research, Society and Development, 10, e12910716426. 10.33448/rsd-v10i7.16426.
Araújo, D. C., Santos, A. D., Lima, S. V. M. A., Vaez, A. C., Cunha, J. O. & Araújo, K. C. G. M. (2020). Determining the association between dengue and social inequality factors in north-eastern Brazil: A spatial modelling. Geospatial Health, 15.
Barcellos, C. C., Sabroza, P. C., Peiter, P. & Rojas, L. I. (2002). Spatial Organization, Health and Quality of Life: Use of Spatial Analysis and Indicators in Health Situation Analysis. Informe Epidemiológico do SUS, 130.
Brasil. (1988). Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/Constituicao/Emendas/Emc/emc90.htm.
Brasil. (2021). IBGE - Instituto Brasileiro De Geografia E Estatística. Síntese de Indicadores Sociais - SIS. https://www.ibge.gov.br/estatisticas/multidominio/c ondicoes-de-vida-desigualdade-e-pobreza/9221-sintese-de-indicadores-sociais.html?=&t=resultados.
Brasil. (2021). IPEA - Instituto De Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada. Desafios do desenvolvimento. http://desafios.ipea.gov.br/index.php?option=com _content&view=article&id=2261:edicao-no-51&catid=1&Itemid=5.
Caiaffa, W. T., Assunção, R. M., Mattos, A. M. C. & Proietti, F. A. (2007). Spatial vulnerability to dengue in a Brasilian urban area during a 7-year surveillance. Journal of Urban Health, 84, 341.
Carabali, M., Harper, S., Neto, A. L., Sousa, G. S., Caprara, A., Restrepo, B. N. & Kaufman, J. S. (2020). Spatiotemporal distribution and socioeconomic disparities of dengue, chikungunya and Zika in two Latin American cities from 2007 to 2017.
Carmo, R. F., Silva, J. V. J. J, Pastor, A. F. & Souza, C. D. F. (2020). Spatiotemporal dynamics, risk areas and social determinants of dengue in Northeastern Brazil, 2014-2017: an ecological study. Infectious Diseases of Poverty, 9.
Follador, K., Prado, G. P., Passos, M. G. & Nothaft, S. C. (2015). Saneamento básico: meio ambiente e saúde. Revista Uningá, 23, 24.
Freitas, M. A., Mattos, A. T. R., Gomes, W. Z. & Caccia-Bava, M. C. G. G. (2017). Who are they, what do they talk about and who listens to the poor? Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 22, 3859-3882.
Gomes, M. P. M., Matos, J. T. Q., Gomes, J. & Heller, L. (2020). Gestão adequada de resíduos sólidos como fator de proteção na ocorrência da dengue. Revista Panamericana de Salud Publica, 44.
Gubler, D. J. (1998). Dengue and dengue hemorrhagic fever. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 482.
Hulley, S. B., Cummings, S. R., Browner, W. S., Grady, D. G. & Newman, T. B. (2008). Delineando a pesquisa clínica: uma abordagem epidemiológica. (3a ed.), Artmed. p.21.
Kikuti, M., Cunha, G. M., Paploski, I. A. D., Kasper, A. M., Silva, M. M. O., Tavares, A. S., Cruz, J. S., Queiroz, T. L., Rodrigues, M. S., Santana, P. M., Lima, H. C. A. V., Calcagno, J., Takahashi, D., Gonçalves, A. H. O., Araújo, J. M. G., Gauthier, K., Diuk-Wasser, M. A., Kitron, U., Ko, A. L., Reis, M. G., Ribeiro, G. S. B. & Christopher, M. (2015). Spatial Distribution of Dengue in a Brazilian Urban Slum Setting: Role of Socioeconomic Gradient in Disease Risk. Vol.9.
Londe, L. R., Moura, L. G., Coutinho, M. P., Marchezini, V. & Soriano, E. (2018). Vulnerability, health and disasters in São Paulo coast (Brazil): Challenges for a sustainable development. Ambiente e Sociedade, 21.
Linde, K. & Willich, S. N. (2002). How objective are systematic reviews? Differences between reviews on complementary medicine. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, p.17.
Machado, J. P., Oliveira, R. M. & Souza-Santos, R. (2009). Análise espacial da ocorrência de dengue e condições de vida na cidade de Nova Iguaçu. Cad. Saúde Pública, 25, 1025-1034.
Mendonça, F. A., Souza, A. V. & Dutra, D. A. (2009). Saúde pública, urbanização e dengue no Brasil. Sociedade & Natureza, 21, 257-269. http://www.seer.ufu.br/index.php/sociedadenatureza/article/view/9606/5783.
MINISTÉRIO DA SAÚDE. (2021). Dengue. https://www.gov.br/saude/pt-br/assuntos/saude-de-a-a-z-1/d/dengue.
Olive, M., Baldet, T., Devillers, J., Fite, J., Paty, M., Paupy, C., Quenel, P., Quillery, E., Raude, J., Stahl, J., Thiann-Bo-Morel, M. & Roiz, D. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic should not jeopardize dengue control. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 14.
Oliveira, K. K. F., Caprara, A. (2019). The social face of Aedes control: women take the floor in a suburban district of Fortaleza, Brazil. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 24, 2983.
Paixão, E. S., Costa, M. C. N., Rodrigues, L. C., Rasella, D., Cardim, L. L., Brasileiro, A. C. & Teixeira, M. G. L. C. (2015). Trends and factors associated with dengue mortality and fatality in Brazil. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, 48, 399-405.
Pedro, A. S., Souza-Santos, R., Sabroza, P. C. & Oliveira, R. M. (2009). Condições particulares de produção e reprodução da dengue em nível local: estudo de Itaipu, Região Oceânica de Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Cad. Saúde Pública. 1937.
Ribeiro, H. & Vargas, H. C. (2015). Urbanização, globalização e saúde. Revista USP.
Santos, J. P. C., Honório, N. A., Barcellos, C. & Nobre, A. A. (2020). A Perspective on Inhabited Urban Space: Land Use and Occupation, Heat Islands, and Precarious Urbanization as Determinants of Territorial Receptivity to Dengue in the City of Rio De Janeiro. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol.17, p.6537.
Sousa, C. D. S. S., Sousa, S. C. S. & Alvares, S. M. (2015). Diretrizes normativas para o saneamento básico no Brasil. Caderno de Geografia, 25(43).
Tauil, P. L. (2001). Urbanização e ecologia do dengue. Cad. Saúde Pública. 17, 99-102.
Tauzer, E., Borbor-Cordova, M. J., Mendoza, J., De La Cuadra, T., Cunalata, J. & Stewart-Ibarra, A. M. (2019). A participatory community case study of periurban coastal flood vulnerability in southern Ecuador. PLoS ONE, 14.
Teurlai, M., Menkès, C. E., Cavarero, V., Degallier, N., Descloux, E., Grangeon, J., Guillaumot, L., Libourel, T., Lucio, P. S., Mathieu-Daudé, F. & Mangeas, M. (2015). Socio-economic and Climate Factors Associated with Dengue Fever Spatial Heterogeneity: A Worked Example in New Caledonia. 9.
Whiteman, A., Gomez, C., Rovira, J., Chen, G., Mcmillan, W. & Loaiza, J. (2019). Aedes Mosquito Infestation in Socioeconomically Contrasting Neighborhoods of Panama City. EcoHealth, 16, 210-221.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Mônica dos Santos Alves; Wellington Candeia de Araújo; Francisco Anderson Mariano da Silva
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
