The revitalization of Maqasid al-Mu‘amalat according to Abdullah bin Bayyah and Its implications on Islamic law

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i14.21295

Keywords:

Islamic law; Maqasid al-Mu‘amalat; Revitalization.

Abstract

The revitalization of Islamic law continues to experience renewal in welcoming the new world economy era that offers the influence of global cultural acculturation and advances in information technology on the one hand, and the rise of spiritualism and nationalism on the other. The study of economics is not new in the discourse of Islamic law, which is better known as mu'amalat. For a long time, the discourse on the objectives of the Sharia (maqasid al-shari‘ah) has become a non-negotiable need. The necessity of knowing it, the urgency of studying it, and the implications of Muslim scholars’ thoughts in navigating the ocean of Islamic law to arrive at the sea of ​​wisdom are strongly influenced by maqasid al-shari‘ah. This is based on the assumption that it is not enough just to know and examine in detail the textual texts which can result in a misunderstanding of the purposes and objectives of God and His Messenger in formulating Islamic law, but it is very necessary to study the values and objectives of the Sharia texts that were revealed. Thus, Ibn Bayyah tried to combine the study of maqasid al-shari'ah with mu'amalat based on the objectives of the transaction and the results of observation of reality. In his research results, he stated that the revitalization of objectives of wealth as a new basis of thought in the discourse of Islamic law would update the concept of the jurisprudence of transactions in its old face which was rigid, out of date, conservative, and less applicable. This is like the human need for wealth considered as a crucial thing that occupies the first position in objectives of wealth (maqasid al-mu'amalat).

References

Abdullah bin Bayyah. (2014). Retrieved from the Aljazeera website: https://www.aljazeera.net/encyclopedia/icons/2014/11/12/عبد-الله-بن-بيه.

Ashur, M. T. B. (2006). Maqasid al-Shari‘ah al-Islamiyyah. Cairo: Dar al-Salam.

Ulaysh, A. B. M. (2016). Minah al-Jalil Sharh Mukhtasar Khalil: dhabatahu wa shahhahahu ‘Abd al-Jalil ‘Abd al-Salam, Juz. 5. Bairut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.

Krisis Moneter Terburuk Sepanjang Sejarah Dunia. (2018). Retrieved from Sindonews website: https://ekbis.sindonews.com/read/1312104/180/10-krisis-moneter-terburuk-sepanjang-sejarah-dunia-1528277126.

Al‘askar, M. A. M. (1434). Maqasid al-Shari‘ah fi al-Mu‘amalat al-Maliyyah ‘Inda Ibni Taimiyyah wa Atharuha fi al-Ahkam al-Fiqhiyyah wa al-Nawazil al-Maliyyah al-Mu‘asirah (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Umm Al-Qura University Makkah, Saudi Arabia.

Albadawi, Y. A. M. (2000). Maqasid al-Shari‘ah ‘inda Ibn Taimiyyah. Yordania: Dar al-Nafa’is.

Aljashshash, A. R. (1992). Ahkam al-Qur’an, tahqiq Muhammad al-Sadiq Qumhawi, Juz. 5. Bairut: Dar Ihya’ al-Turath al-‘Arabi.

Aljawwad, A. J. A. (2017). ‘Ulama’ Aghniya’ Atharu al-‘Ilm ‘Ala al-Maladhdhat. Tunis: Dar al-Maziri li al-Nashr wa al-Tawzi‘.

Alkhawjah, M. H. (2004). Shaikh al-Islam al-Imam al-Akbar Muhammad al-Tahir bin ‘Ashur, Juz. 3. Qatar: Wuzarotu al-Awqaf wa al-Shu’un al-Islamiyyah.

Almanzur, M. B. M. (2010). Lisan al-‘Arab, Juz. 3. Bairut: Dar Sadir.

Almuqri’, A. F. (2016). Al-Misbah al-Munir fi Gharib al-Sharh al-Kabir, Juz. 2. Cairo: Dar al-Ma‘arif.

Alnawawi, Y. B. S. (1930). Al-Minhaj Sharh Sahih Muslim bin Hajjaj, Juz. 11. Cairo: Al-Matba‘ah al-Masriyyah bi al-Azhar.

Alqurtubi, A. A. M. (2006). Al-Jami‘ li Ahkam al-Qur’an: tahqiq ‘Abdullah bin ‘Abd al-Muhsin al-Turki, Juz. 20. Bairut: Muassasah al-Risalah.

Alqurtubi, A. B. N. (1999). Al-Tamhid lima fi al-Muwatta’ min al-Ma‘ani wa al-Asanid: tahqiq Muhammad ‘Abd al-Qadir ‘Ata, Juz. 2. Bairut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Alsa‘di, A.R.B.N. (2015). Al-Qawa‘id wa al-Ushul al-Jami‘ah. Cairo: Maktabah al-Sunnah.

Bayyah, A. M. B. (2013). Maqasid al-Mu‘amalat wa Marasid al-Waqi‘at, 3rd ed. London: Al-Furqan Islamic Heritage Foundation.

Bayyah, A. M. B. (2014). Maqasid al-Mu‘amalat wa Marasid al-Waqi‘at, 4rd ed. London: Al-Furqan Islamic Heritage Foundation.

Bayyah, A. M. B. (2015). Maqasid al-Mu‘amalat wa Marasid al-Waqi‘at, 5rd ed. London: Al-Furqan Islamic Heritage Foundation.

Goswami, M., Postone, M., Sartori, A., & Sewell, W. H. (2014). Introducing Critical Historical Studies. The Journal of Modern History, 1 (1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1086/675083

Gwartney, J. D., Stroup, R. L., Sobel, R. S., Macpherson, D. A. (2015), Economics: Private and Public Choice, 15th edition. Stamford: Cengage Learning.

Hasani, I. (1995). Nazariyyat al-Maqasid ‘inda al-Imam Muhammad al-Tahir bin ‘Ashur (1st ed). Virginia: Ma‘had al-Islami li al-Fikr al-Islami.

Hegel, W. H. (1965). The History of Philosophy. In: Ethan Kleinberg (Ed). History and Theory: Studies in the Philosophy of History. New Jersey: Wiley.

I‘timad Tashkil Majlis al-Imarat li al-Ifta’ al-Shar‘iy. (2018). Retrieved from the Albayan website: https://www.albayan.ae/across-the-uae/news-and-reports/2018-06-24-1.3299552.

Ibrahim, A. W. (1988). Tartib al-Mawdu‘at al-Fiqhiyyah wa Munasabatuhu fi al-Madhahib al-Arba‘ah. Makkah: Jami‘ah Umm al-Qura.

Jakfar. (2010). Tarjamah al-‘Allamah ‘Abdullah bin Bayyah. Retrieved from https://al-maktaba.org/book/31617/72340.

Kincheloe, Joe L. (2000). Making Critical Thinking Critical. In Shirley Steinberg (Ed.). Counterpoints: Studies in Criticality. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.

Lashin, M. S. (2002). Fath al-Mun‘im Sharh Sahih Muslim, Juz. 6. Cairo: Dar al-Shuruq.

Makhdah, S. A. A. (2017). Usus al-Maliyyah al-Islamiyyah. In International Seminar with theme: Al-Ribh fi al-Mu’assasat al-Maliyyah al-Islamiyyah. Islamic University of Gaza; April 26.

Malkawi, F. H. (2011). Buhuth al-Mu’tamar al-Dawli Haula al-Shaikh Muhammad al-Tahir Ibn ‘Ashur wa Qadaya al-Islah wa al-Tajdid fi al-Fikri al-Islami al-Mu‘asir. Herndon, Virginia: Al-Ma’had al-‘Alami li al-Fikri al-Islami.

Political transition in Mauritania: Assessment and horizons. (2006). Retrieved from Reliefweb.int website: https://reliefweb.int/report/mauritania/political-transition-mauritania-assessment-and-horizons.

Prakasa, D. B. (2018). Sejarah Revolusi Industri 1.0 Hingga 4.0. Menara Ilmu Otomasi Departemen Teknik Elektro dan Informatika Sekolah Vokasi Universitas Gadjah Mada. Retrieved from: http://otomasi.sv.ugm.ac.id/2018/10/09/sejarah-revolusi-industri-1-0-hingga-4-0/.

Rahmah, U. (2018). Abdullah bin Bayah: Pelopor Moderasi dan Perdamaian. Retrieved from: https://bincangsyariah.com/khazanah/abdullah-bin-bayah-pelopor-moderasi-dan-perdamaian/.

Royse, D. (2011). Research Methods in Social Work. New York: Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning.

Salih, A. (2006). Al-Shar‘iyyah baina Fiqh al-Khilafah wa Waqi‘iha Juz 1. (1st ed.). Cairo: International Institute of Islamic Thought.

Schiemann. (2007). John W. Bizarre Beliefs and Rational Choices: A Behavioral Approach to Analytic Narratives. The Journal of Politics, 69 (2):24-511. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00547.x

Shabir, M. U. (2007). Al-Mu‘amalat al-Maliyyah al-Mu‘asirah fi al-Fiqh al-Islami (6th ed.). ‘Amman: Dar al-Nafa’is.

Taimiyyah, T. A. B. (2004). Majmu‘ Fatawa bin Taimiyyah: tahqiq ‘Abd al-Rahman bin Muhammad bin Qasim, Juz. 32. Madinah: Wuzarah al-Shu’un al-Islamiyyah wa al-Awqaf wa al-Da‘wah wa al-Irshad.

Tarjamah al-‘Allamah ‘Abdullah bin Bayyah: Al-Mawqi’ al-Rasmy li al-‘Allamah ‘Abdullah Ibn Bayyah. (2017). Retrieved from the Binbayyah website: http://binbayyah.net/arabic/archives/1417.

Downloads

Published

27/10/2021

How to Cite

ROBBANI, S. .; YASID, A.; SANURI, S. The revitalization of Maqasid al-Mu‘amalat according to Abdullah bin Bayyah and Its implications on Islamic law. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 14, p. e104101421295, 2021. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v10i14.21295. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21295. Acesso em: 15 jun. 2024.

Issue

Section

Human and Social Sciences