Use of rotary systems in endodontic treatment in dental pediatrics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i16.24050Keywords:
Child Health; Pediatric Dentistry; Pulpectomy; Root canal preparation.Abstract
This literature review aimed to evaluate the use of rotary file systems compared to standard manual file systems, taking into account the time and quality of root canal preparation in primary teeth, as well as the effect of treatment with these files on cooperation and the development of postoperative pain in children. The bibliographic survey was based on articles published in the last 5 years, found in the following databases in the health area: PubMed/Medline, Scopus, LILACS, SciELO and Cocrhane. The results showed that endodontic treatments with rotary files exhibited shorter time and better quality of the biomechanical preparation of the canals in primary teeth, as well as resulted in less experience of postoperative pain, when compared to the use of manual files. Based on this, it is possible to conclude that pulpectomies performed with rotary files are effective, safe and reduce treatment time and postoperative pain in pediatric endodontic treatment.
References
Ahmed, H. M. A. (2013). Anatomical challenges, electronic working length determination and current developments in root canal preparation of primary molar teeth. International Endodontic Journal, 46 (1), 1011-1022.
Barasuol, J. C., Massignan, C., Bortoluzzi, E. A., Cardoso, M., & Bolan, M. (2021). Influence of hand and rotary files for endodontic treatment of primary teeth on immediate outcomes: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Int J Paediatr Dent, 31 (1), 143-151.
Boonchoo, K., Leelataweewud, P., Yanpiset, K., & Jirarattanasopha, V. (2020). Simplify pulpectomy in primary molars with a single-file reciprocating system: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clinical Oral Investigations, 24 (1), 2683-2689.
Chauhan, A., Saini, S., Dua, P., & Mangla, R. (2019). Rotary Endodontics in Pediatric Dentistry: Embracing the New Alternative. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 12 (5), 460-463.
Chugh, V. K., Patnana, A. K., Chugh, A., Kumar, P., Wadhwa, P., & Singh, S. (2021). Clinical differences of hand and rotary instrumentations during biomechanical preparation in primary teeth—A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Paediatr Dent., 31 (1), 131-142.
George, S., Anandaraj, S., Issac, J. S., John, S. A., & Harris, A. (2016). Rotary endodontics in primary teeth – A review. The Saudi Dental Journal, 28 (1), 12-17.
Govindaraju, L., Jeevanandan, G., & Subramanian, E. M. G. (2017). Comparison of quality of obturation and instrumentation time using hand files and two rotary file systems in primary molars: A single‑blinded randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Dentistry, 11 (3), 376-379.
Hermont, A. P., Zina, L. G., Silva, K. D., Silva, J. M., & Martins-Júnior, P. A. (2021). Revisões integrativas: conceitos, planejamento e execução. Arq Odontol, 57 (1), 3-7.
Jeevanandan, G., & Thomas, E. (2018). Volumetric analysis of hand, reciprocating and rotary instrumentation techniques in primary molars using spiral computed tomography: An in vitro comparative study. European Journal of Dentistry, 12 (1), 21-26.
Jeevanandan, G., Ravindran, V., Subramanian, E. M. G., & Kumar, A. (2020). Postoperative Pain with Hand, Reciprocating, and Rotary Instrumentation Techniques after Root Canal Preparation in Primary Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 13 (1), 21-26.
Jeevanandan, G., Govindaraju, L., Subramanian, E. M. G., & Priyadarshini, P. (2021). Comparative Evaluation of Quality of Obturation and Its Effect on Postoperative Pain between Pediatric Hand and Rotary Files: A Double-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 14 (1), 88-96.
Lakshmanan, L., Mani, G., Jeevanandan, G., Ravindran, V., & Erulappan Muthu Ganapathi, S. (2020). Assessing the quality of root canal filling and instrumentation time using kedo-s files, reciprocating files and k-files. Braz Dent Sci., 23 (1), 1-7.
Manchanda, S., Sardana, D., & Yiu, C. K. Y. (2020). A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing rotary canal instrumentation techniques with manual instrumentation techniques in primary teeth. International Endodontic Journal, 53 (1), 333-353.
Mehlawat, R., Kapoor, R., Gandhi, K., Kumar, D., Malhotra, R., & Ahuja, S. (2019). Comparative evaluation of instrumentation timing and cleaning efficacy in extracted primary molars using manual and NiTi rotary technique – Invitro study. Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research, 9 (1), 151-155.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Plos Medicine, 6 (7), 1-6.
Nair, M., Jeevanandan, G., Vignesh, R., & Subramanian, E. M. G. (2018). Comparative evaluation of post-operative pain after pulpectomy with K-files, Kedo-S files and MTwo files in deciduous molars -a randomized clinical trial. Braz Dent Sci, 21 (4), 411-417.
Natchiyar, N., Asokan, S., Priya, P. R. G., & Kumar, T. D. Y. (2021). Comparison of Clinical and Radiographic Success of Rotary with Manual Instrumentation Techniques in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 14 (1), 8-13.
Pawar, B., Pawar, A. M., Bhardwaj, A., Wahjuningrum, D. A., Rahardjo, A. K., Luke, A. M., Metzger, Z., & Kfir, A. (2021). Effect of Adaptive, Rotary, and Manual Root Canal Instrumentation in Primary Molars: A Triple-Armed, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Biology, 42 (1), 1-11.
Ramazani, N., Mohammadi, A., Amirabadi, F., Ramazani, M., & Ehsani, F. (2016). In vitro investigation of the cleaning efficacy, shaping ability, preparation time and file deformation of continuous rotary, reciprocating rotary and manual instrumentations in primary molars. JODDD, 10 (1), 49-56.
Rathi, N., Jain, S., Thosar, N., Baliga, S., Ahmed, F., & Metha, J. (2021). Comparative Evaluation of Cleaning Efficiency and Apical Extrusion of Debris Using Two Pediatric Rotary Endodontic Files: An In Vitro Study. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 14 (2), 196-200.
Seema, T., Ahammed, H., Parul, S., & Cheranjeevi, J. (2020). Comparative Evaluation of Dentin Removal and Taper of Root Canal Preparation of Hand K File, ProTaper Rotary File, and Kedo S Rotary File in Primary Molars Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 13 (4), 332-336.
Shah, H. S., Patil, V. M., Kamath, A. P., & Mathur, A. A. (2021). Comparative Evaluation of Instrumentation Time, Obturation Time, and Radiographic Quality of Obturation Using Two Rotary Systems and Manual Technique for Primary Molar Pulpectomies – In vivo Study. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry, 12 (1), 55-62.
Srinivas, A., Jeevanandan, G., Govindaraju, L., & Subramanian, E. M. G. (2019). Comparative Evaluation of The Efficacy Of Rotary file system (Kedo-S) Vs Hand K-Files In Root Canal Preparation Of Primary Teeth Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) - An In Vitro Study. Braz Dent Sci., 22 (2), 197-202.
Tyagi, R., Khatri, A., Kalra, N., & Sabherwal, P. (2021). Comparative Evaluation of Hand K-flex Files, Pediatric Rotary Files, and Reciprocating Files on Instrumentation Time, Postoperative Pain, and Child’s Behavior in 4–8-year old Children. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 14 (2), 201-206.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Mariana Karlla de Melo Lins; Adilson Rodrigues da Silva Filho; Ana Maria Guerra Costa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
