Design for multiplicity: a proposal for the integration of different areas with mutual contributions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i1.25253Keywords:
Design; Multiplicity; Intellectual property; Health; Accessibility.Abstract
This article presents the proposal of the research group “Design for multiplicity (Design+)”. This aims to investigate design connections with other areas of knowledge, integrating academia and society through the social contributions made possible through these links. Initially, the group investigates the connections between design and the areas of health and law, being able to integrate other areas according to the demands of project development. The grouped surveys bring together projects in the lines of information design in education and health, intellectual property and innovation, in addition to multidisciplinary projects and processes. It uses in its methodology, of a theoretical, exploratory and qualitative nature, technical procedures of case study and bibliographical survey when presenting references related to the case of a specific research group. This article presents by results a discussion about the main themes and actions of each line of research, with authors who support the discussion. In the final considerations, there are statements about the integration of such areas and their relevance for design research.
References
Brasil. (2020) Grupo Interministerial de Propriedade Intelectual (GIPI). Secretaria Executiva do GIPI: Ministério da Economia. Estratégia Nacional de Propriedade Intelectual. Brasília.
Carpes Júnior, W. P. (2014). Introdução ao projeto de produtos [recurso eletrônico. Bookman.
Federici, S., & Scherer, M. J. (2012). Assistive Technology Assessment Handbook. CRC Press.
Ferro, G. S., & Hermann, A. (2019). Empatia com equipes multidisciplinares na fase de Ideação do processo de design Thinking. Projética, 10(3), 81-98, 10.5433/2236-2207.2019v10n3p81.
Freitas, R. F. Waechter, H. N. & Coutinho, S. G. (2014). Prevenção às DST/Aids: design da informação para promoção da saúde. Revista Brasileira de Design da Informação / Brazilian Journal of Information Design. 11(1), 64 – 85.
Foresberg, K., et al (2005). Visualizing Project management: models and frameworks for mastering complex systems. (3a ed.) Wiley.
Kadgien, C., & Kuhlman, N. (2018). Neuroleadership: can neuroscience be our guide to better management? Healthcare management Forum. Disponível em: https://healthcaremanagementforum.wordpress.com/2018/04/19/neuroleadership-can-neuroscience-be-our-guide-to-better-management/
Kemper, L., & Farrokh, M. (1998). The other side of multidisciplinary design: Accomodating a multiobjective, uncertain and non-deterministic world. Engineering Optimization, 31(2), 161-189.
Hoogerwerf, E. J., et al. (2013). Towards a framework for user involvement in research and development of emerging assistive technologies. In: ENCARNAÇÃO, L. A. P., et al. (Ed.). Assistive Technology: From Research to Practice: IOS Press, 33, 531-536.
Martins, R. F. D. F., & Merino, E. A. D. (2011). Gestão de design como estratégia organizacional. Rio Books, 247.
Mayrinck, P. H. S. de S. A., & Simões-Borgiani, D. S. (2021). The scarcity of industrial designs register that come from fashion in Pernambuco. Research, Society and Development, 10(13), e51101321002. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i13.21002
Montagna, C. Carvalho, H. Carvalho, C., & Catarino, A. (2020). O designer de produto como elemento de ligação nas equipas multidisciplinares. Revista Lusófona de Educação, (20), 99-108. http://www.scielo.mec.pt/pdf/rle/n20/n20a07.pdf.
Patrocínio, G. (2013). The Impact of European Design Polices and Their Implications in the Development of a Framework to Support Future Brazilian Design Polices. Tese. 2013. Bedfordshire: Cranfield University.
Patrocínio, G. (2018). Políticas de design e a propriedade Intelectual: demandas para uma nova era. SEBRAE, 2018.
Pichler, R. F. & Merino, G. S. A. D. (2018). As equipes multidisciplinares na prática projetual e no contexto da TA: uma revisão sistemática. In: Paschoarelli, L. C., Medola, F. O. Tecnologia Assistiva: estudos teóricos. Canal 6 Editora.
Pichler, R. F., & Merino, G. S. A. D. (2018). As equipes multidisciplinares na prática projetual e no contexto da TA: uma revisão sistemática. In: Tecnologia Assistiva: estudos teóricos. Luis Carlos Paschoarelli e Fausto Orsi Medola (Orgs). Canal 6 Editora, 401 p.
Pirinen, A. (2016). The barriers and enablers of co-design for services. International Journal of Design, Helsinki, FIN, 10(3), 27-42.
Rorsberg, K., Mooz, H., & Cotterman, H. (2005). Visualizing Project Management: models and frameworks for mastering complex systems. (3a ed.), Estados Unidos: Wiley.
Silva, E. L. Da & Menezes, E. M. (2011). Metodologia Da Pesquisa E Elaboração De Dissertação. (4a ed.), UFSC.
Spinillo, C. & Farias, P. (2004). Editorial InfoDesign. Revista Brasileira de Design da Informação / Brazilian Journal of Information Design. 1(1).
Spinillo, C., G. & Escobar, B., T. (2016). Retórica visual na infografia sobre saúde. Revista Brasileira de Design da Informação / Brazilian Journal of Information Design. 13(2), 162 – 179.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Camila Brito de Vasconcelos; Danielle Silva Simões-Borgiani; Rosimeri Franck Pichler
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.