Brief notes about fraud in the process and in material law

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i3.26708

Keywords:

Procedural or material fraud; Procedural law; Substantive law.

Abstract

The objective of this work is to approach about fraud in the scope of Brazilian law. For the study, it is necessary to proceed with the due distinction of what is classified as fraud in the scope of procedural law, that is, fraud in the process, as well as, what is considered and classified as fraud in substantive law, directly linked to the obligations governed by civil law. It is important that such a definition is made so that it is possible, within the scope of the legal debate, to define the applicable rule and the way to proceed, if the fraud envisaged is procedural or material fraud, understanding that this classification will determine whether the fraud is against execution or against creditors, an important differentiation for legal treatment. Recognizing fraud and its classification in the legal environment is necessary so that it is possible to reprimand the illicit act and undo operations that aim to circumvent the law and harm legitimate creditors, through incisive action by the Judiciary.

References

Araújo, F. C. (2016) Curso de processo civil: parte geral – Atualizado com a Lei 13.256/2016. – São Paulo: Malheiros.

Ávila, H. (2015) Teoria dos princípios: da definição à aplicação dos princípios jurídicos. – 16. ed. rev. e atual. – São Paulo: Malheiros.

Cahali, Y. S. (1999) Fraude contra credores: fraude contra credores, fraude à execução, ação revocatória falencial, fraude à execução fiscal e fraude à execução penal. – 2. ed. rev., e ampl. – São Paulo: Editora Revista dos Tribunais.

Câmara, A. F. (2017) O novo processo civil brasileiro. 3. ed. – São Paulo: Atlas.

Degani, P. M. (2014) O plano da existência, validade e eficácia do negócio jurídico; os defeitos do negócio jurídico; prescrição e decadência. Jus, 2014. https://jus.com.br/artigos/32132/o-plano-da-existencia-validade-e-eficacia-do-negocio-juridico-os-defeitos-do-negocio-juridico-prescricao-e-decadencia.

Didier Júnior, F.; Braga, P. S.; Oliveira, R. (2012) Curso de Direito Processual Civil. 4. ed. Salvador: Jus Podivm.

Dinamarco, C. R. (1993) Execução Civil. 3. ed. ampl. e atual. São Paulo – Malheiros.

Dutra, F. A. (2015) Fraude de execução e efetividade da prestação jurisdicional. Revista Síntese de Direito Civil e Processual Civil, ISSN 2179-166X, São Paulo, nº 96, jul-ago.

Lucon, P. H. S. (2000) Fraude à Execução, Responsabilidade Processual Civil e Registro de Penhora. Revista Síntese de Direito Civil e Processual Civil, v.1, n. 5.

Marinoni, L. G.; Arenhart, S. C & Mitidiero. (2020) Curso de processo civil.

Martins-Costa, J. (2000) A boa-fé no direito privado: sistema e tópica no processo obrigacional. 1 ed. 2. tir. São Paulo: Editora RT.

Miranda, P. (2000) Tratado de direito privado. Campinas: Bookseller.

Paes, P. R. T. (1993) Fraude contra credores. 3. ed. aum. e. atual. – São Paulo: Editora Revista dos Tribunais.

Pedrosa, M. (2013) Princípio da boa-fé. Jusbrasil, 2013. https://marcospedrosapedrosa.jusbrasil.com.br/artigos/111813775/principio-da-boa-fe.

Salamancha, J. E. (2006) Fraude contra credores: efeitos da sentença na ação pauliana. Revista de Processo, vol. 135/2006, p. 75-89, mai. 2006. https://www.revistadostribunais.com.br/maf/app/widgetshomepage/resultList/document?&src=rl&srguid=i0ad82d9b0000017e70e0f57c1a5a9ce5&docguid=Ibe10de50f25611dfab6f010000000000&hitguid=Ibe10de50f25611dfab6f010000000000&spos=1&epos=1&td=2101&context=185&crumb-action=append&crumb-label=Documento&isDocFG=false&isFromMultiSumm=&startChunk=1&endChunk=1.

Theodoro Junior, H. (1996) Fraude contra credores: a natureza da sentença pauliana. – Belo Horizonte: Del Rey.

Theodoro Junior, H. (2007). Processo de execução e cumprimento de sentença. 24. ed. rev., ampl. e atual. – São Paulo: Liv. e Ed. Universitária de Direito.

Venosa, S. S. (2013) Direito civil: parte geral. 13. ed. – São Paulo: Atlas.

Villar, A. S. (2015) O reconhecimento da fraude à execução no novo CPC. Jusbrasil, 2015. https://alice.jusbrasil.com.br/artigos/235904899/o-reconhecimento-da-fraude-a-execucao-no-novo-cpc.

Downloads

Published

01/03/2022

How to Cite

TRENTO, P. G. . Brief notes about fraud in the process and in material law. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 11, n. 3, p. e39711326708, 2022. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v11i3.26708. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/26708. Acesso em: 16 nov. 2024.

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 3

Section

Human and Social Sciences

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Paulo Gustavo Trento

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.