The new uses of the enamel matrix derivative: literature review

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i4.27312

Keywords:

Periodontics; Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal; Subgingival curettage; Dental enamel proteins; Endothelial growth factors.

Abstract

Seeking to demonstrate the recent uses of the enamel matrix derivative (EMD), the objective of this work is to develop a literature review of the use of biomaterial in soft tissues and in the treatment of peri-implantitis. The search for scientific articles was carried out at Pubmed, the selected literature was from 2010 to 2020, found with the following descriptors: “Emdogain And Soft Tissue” and “Emdogain And Peri-Implantitis”. Studies on bone regeneration treatment, bone graft, treatment of patients with systemic disease were excluded. The selected sample consisted of 17 articles, and the results found favor the use of EMD. In the healing of soft tissues around teeth and implants, the works report the good hypotheses in relation to cicatricial cellular events (angiogenesis, fibroplasia and reduction of inflammatory markers) and histological evaluations that EMD promotes when facing surgical wounds. In root coverage of different types of recessions, improvements were also seen with the use of EMD, but procedures based on connective tissue grafts still show superior results. In the treatment of peri-implantitis, EMD seems to present a good result as an adjuvant, but more studies need to be performed. The use of EMD is justified by the possibility of achieving periodontal regeneration in the treated sites and by its positive attributes in the healing process of various periodontal procedures in soft tissues, in the techniques of root covering and in the treatment of peri-implantitis.

References

Al-Hezaimi K., Al-Fahad H., O’Neill R., Shuman L., & Griffin T. (2012). The effect of enamel matrix protein on gingival tissue thickness in vivo. Odontology. 100 (1):61-6. 10.1007/s10266-011-0022-5.

Ardakani M. R. T., Meimandi M., Shaker R., & Golmohammadi S. (2019). The Effect of Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF), Plasma Rich in Growth Factors (PRGF), and Enamel Matrix Proteins (Emdogain) on Migration of Human Gingival Fibroblasts. J Dent (Shiraz). 20 (4):232-39. 10.30476/DENTJODS.2019.44917.

Aspriello S. D., Zizzi A., Spazzafumo L., Rubini C., Lorenzi T., Marzioni D., Bullon P., & Piemontese M. (2011). Effects of Enamel Matrix Derivative on Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Expression and Microvessel Density in Gingival Tissues of Periodontal Pocket: A Comparative Study. J Periodontol. 82(4): 606-12. 10.1902/jop.2010.100180.

Aydinyurt H. S., Tekin Y., & Ertugrul A. S. (2019). The effect of enamel matrix derivatives on root coverage: a 12-month follow-up of a randomized clinical trial. Braz. Oral Res. 33(1):1-8. 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0006.

Bates C., Marino V., Fazzalari N. L., & Bartold M. (2011). Soft Tissue Attachment to Titanium Implants Coated with Growth Factors. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 15(1):53-63. 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00327.x.

Bizarria V. D., Lima G. P, Pereira L. B., Teixeira D. N. R., Mendonça M. B., Andrade R. S., & Borges D. C. (2021). A associação do enxerto de tecido conjuntivo subepitelial e a matriz derivada do esmalte no recobrimento das recessões gengivais. Research, Society and Development, 10 (13), 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i13.21417

Chambrone L. & Tatakis D. N. (2015). Periodontal Soft Tissue Root Coverage Procedures: A Systematic Review From the AAP Regeneration Workshop. J Periodontol. 86(2):8-51. 10.1902/jop.2015.130674.

Froum S. J., Froum S. H., & Rosen P. S. (2012). Successful Management of Peri-Implantitis with a Regenerative Approach: A Consecutive Series of 51 Treated Implants with 3- to 7.5-Year Follow-up. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 32(1):11-20. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22254219/

Gestrelius S., Andersson C., Johansson A-C., Persson E., Brodin A., Rydhag L., & Hammarstrom L. (1997). Formulation of enamel matrix derivative for surface coating. Kinetics and cell colonization. J Clin Periodontol. 24(9 Pt 2): 678-684. 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1997.tb00249.x.

Hammarström L., Heijl L., & Gestrelius S. (1997). Periodontal Regeneration in a Buccal Dehiscence Model in Monkeys After Application of Enamel Matrix Proteins. J.Clin. Periodont. 24(9 Pt 2):669-77. 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1997.tb00248.x.

Isehed C., Svenson B., Lundberg P., & Holmlund A. (2018). Surgical treatment of peri‐implantitis using enamel matrix derivative, an RCT: 3‐ and 5‐year follow‐up. Jornaul of Clinical Periodontology. 45(6): 744-53. 10.1111/jcpe.12894.

Kashefimehr A., Pourabbas R., Faramarzi M., Zarandi A., Moradi M., Tenenbaum H.C., & Azarpazhooh A. (2017). Effects of enamel matrix derivative on non-surgical management of peri-implant mucositis: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Invest. 21(7):2379-2388. 10.1007/s00784-016-2033-7.

Maymon-Gil T., Weinberg E., Nemcovsky C., & Weinreb M. (2016). Enamel Matrix Derivative Aids Wound Healing in Rat Oral Mucosa. J Periodontol. 87(5): 601-9. 10.1902/jop.2016.150567.

Miron R. J., Dard M., & Weinreb M. (2015). Enamel matrix derivative, inflammation and soft tissue wound healing. J Periodontal Res. 50(5):555-69. 10.1111/jre.12245.

Miron R. J., Sculean A., Cochran D. L., Froum S., Zucchelli G., Nemcovsky C., Donos N., Lyngstadaas S.P., Deschner J., Dard M., Stavropoulos A., Zhang Y., Trombelli L., Kasaj A., Shirakata Y., Cortellini P., Tonetti M., Rasperini G., Jepsen S., & Bosshardt D.D. (2016). Twenty years of enamel matrix derivative: the past, the present and the future. J Clin Periodontology. 43(8): 668-83. 10.1111/jcpe.12546.

Pini-Prato G., Nieri M., Pagliaro U., Giorgi T .S., Marca M. L., Franceschi D., Buti J., Giani M., Weiss J. H., Padeletti L., Cortellini P., Chambrone L., Barzagli L., Defraia E., & Rotundo R. (2014). Surgical Treatment of Single Gingival Recessions: Clinical Guidelines. Eur J Oral Implantol. Spring. 7(1):9-43. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24892111/.

Rasperini G., Roccuzzo M., Francetti L., Acunzo R., Consonni D., & Silvestri M. (2011). Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft for Treatment of Gingival Recessions With and Without Enamel Matrix Derivative: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 31(2):133-9. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21491012/.

Rebele S. F., Zuhr O., Schneider D., Jung R. E., & Hurzeler M. B. (2014). Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a RCT using 3D digital measuring methods. Part II. Volumetric studies on healing dynamics and gingival dimensions. J Clin Periodontol. 41(6): 593–603. 10.1111/jcpe.12254.

Tatakis D. N., Chambrone L., Allen E. P., Langer B., McGuire M.K., Richardson C. R., Zabalegui I., & Zadeh H. H. (2015). Periodontal Soft Tissue Root Coverage. Procedures: A Consensus Report From the AAP Regeneration Workshop. J Periodontol. 86(2): 52-55. 10.1902/jop.2015.140376.

Tonetti M. S. & Jepsen S. (2014). Clinical efficacy of periodontal plastic surgery procedures: Consensus Report of Group 2 of the 10th European Workshop on Periodontology. J Clin Periodontol. 41 (15): 36-43. 10.1111/jcpe.12219.

Wang Y., Zhang Y., Jing D., Shuang Y., & Miron R. J. (2015). Enamel Matrix Derivative Improves Gingival Fibroblast Cell Behavior Cultured on Titanium Surfaces. Clin Oral Investig. 20(4):685-95. 10.1007/s00784-015-1558-5.

Published

19/03/2022

How to Cite

REIS, J. C.; ALENCAR, C. O.; DIAS, F. F. C. .; MAGALHÃES, L. F.; SUAID, F. F. The new uses of the enamel matrix derivative: literature review. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 11, n. 4, p. e30311427312, 2022. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v11i4.27312. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/27312. Acesso em: 22 nov. 2024.

Issue

Section

Health Sciences