Theoretical and philosophical concepts of metric concepts for the construction of the multicriteria model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i4.27530Keywords:
Models, theoretical; Health care economics and organizations; Competitive bidding; Nursing administration research.Abstract
The present study aims to raise and summarize how metric concepts are structured by hierarchical ontology and also classified by mathematics to finally be represented by a decision support tool. This is a narrative literature review carried out in international databases and gray literature. Thematic content analysis was used with the application of its stages in the material, from which two categories emerged a posteriori; hierarchical ontologies: description of objects through structures and categorization of mathematically structured concepts. It was found that ontology is responsible for the process of sharing, defining, conceptualizing and structuring concepts, the representation theory of mathematics has the task of developing conceptuais systems to define properties/attributes to guarantee the extension and identity of an object and knowledge management organizes knowledge from previous disciplines on machines, saving time and reducing effort. Therefore, until nursing administration manages to make assessment models available in the context of practice for use in statistical tests, there is a long scientific path.
References
Ajmera, Y., Singhal, S., Dwivedi, S. N., & Dey, A. B. (2021). The changing perspective of clinical trial designs. Perspectives in clinical research, 12(2), 66–71. 10.4103/picr.PICR_138_20.
Alt, N., Zhang, T. Y., Motchnik, P., Taticek, R., Quarmby, V., Schlothauer, T., Beck, H., Emrich, T., & Harris, R. J. (2016). Determination of critical quality attributes for monoclonal antibodies using quality by design principles. Biological, 44(5), 291–305. 10.1016/j.biologicals.2016.06.005.
Azevedo Neto., C. X . A. (2008). A abordagem do conceito como uma estrutura semiótica. Transinformação, 20(1), 47–58.
Costa, J. F. D. S., Brazil, C. H. A., & Oliveira, M. B. D. (2003). Metodologia multicritério e ECR: utilização no mercado varejista. Production, 13, (2), 114-122. DOI:10.1590/S0103-65132003000200011.
Bana, C. A., & Costa, E. A methodology for sensitivity analysis in three-criteria problems: A case study in municipal management. European Journal of Operational Research, 33(2), 159-173. 10.1016/0377-2217(88)90367-0.
Dias, M. S. de L., Kafrouni, R., Baltazar, C. S., & Stocki, J. (2014). A formação dos conceitos em Vigotski: Replicando um experimento. Psicologia escolar e educacional, 18(3), 493–500. 10.1590/2175-3539/2014/0183773.
Ferreira, A. O. M, Silvino, Z. R., Balbino, C. M., Izu, M., Souza, C. J., & Matias, D. O. (2020). Modelo multicritérios para o controle de qualidade da fralda geriátrica para o uso hospitalar. Research, Society and Development, 9(7), e753974835-e753974835. 10.33448/rsd-v9i7.4835.
Ferreira, A. O. M, Silvino, Z. R., (2020). Padrões de defeitos dos doentes pós-críticos para avaliação de desempenho no controle de qualidade Research, Society and Development, 9(8), e357985400. /10.33448/rsd-v9i8.5400.
Finkelstein L., (2003). Widely, strongly and weakly defined measurement. Measurement, 34 (1) , 39–48. 10.1016/S0263-2241(03)00018-6.
Gallegos, S. A. (2019). Models as signs: extending Kralemann and Lattman’s proposal on modeling models within Peirce’s theory of signs. Synthese, 196 (12), 5115–5136. 10.1007/s11229-018-1700-4.
Hair Jr., J. F. Black, W. C., Badin B, J., Anderson, R.E., & Tathan, R.L. (2009). Análise multivariada de dados. (6a ed.), Bookman,
Krebs, L. M.; Laipelt, R. C. F. (2018) Teorias da linguística cognitiva para pensar a categorização no âmbito da Ciência da Informação. TransInformação, 30(1), 81–93, 10.1590/2318-08892018000100007.
Kiv, S., Heng, S., Wautelet, Y., Poelmans, S., & Kolp, M. (2022). Using an ontology for systematic practice adoption in agile methods: Expert system and practitioners-based validation. Expert Systems with Applications, 195(June),116520. 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116520.
Malthotra, N. (2012). Pesquisa de marketing : uma orientação aplicada. Bookman
Mari, L. (1997). The role of determination and assignment in measurement. Measurement, 21(3), 79–90. 10.1016/S0263-2241(97)00050-X.
Mari, L., Carbone, P., Giordani, A., & Petri, D. (2017). A structural interpretation of measurement and some related epistemological issues. Studies in history and philosophy of science, (65-66) 46–56. 10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.08.001.
Michell, J. (2013). Constructs, inferences, and mental measurement. New Ideas in Psychology, 31(1), 13–21. 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.02.004.
Miguel, L. A. P., & Popadiuk, S. (2019). A semiótica do compartilhamento de conhecimento tácito: um estudo sob a perspectiva do interacionismo simbólico. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 17(3), 460–473. 10.1590/1679-395172519
Missio, F., & Jacobi, L. F. (2007). Variáveis dummy: especificações de modelos com parâmetros variáveis. Ciência e Natura, 29(1), 111–135. DOI:10.5902/2179460X9764.
Montgomery, D.; Wiley, J. Introduction to Statistical Quality Control. Hoboken: Wiley & Songs, 2009.
Morettin, P. A., & Bussab, W. O. (2010). Estatística Básica. Saraiva.
Oliva, A. (2011). Teoria do conhecimento. Zahar.
Oliveira, F. L. (2015). Triangulação metodológica e abordagem multimétodo na pesquisa sociológica : vantagens e desafios. Ciências Sociais Unisinos, 51(2), 133–143. 10.4013/csu.2015.51.2.03
Pasquali, L. Teoria e métodos de medidas das ciências do comportamento. INEP, 1996.
Pearson, B. D.; Kim, H. S (2006). The Nature of Theoretical Thinking in Nursing. (3a ed.), Springer Publishing.
Rother, E. T. (2007). Revisão sistemática X revisão narrativa. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem, 20(2), v–vi. 10.1590/S0103-21002007000200001.
Wang, X., Chen, L., Ban, T., Usman, M., Guan, Y., Liu, S., Wu T. & Chen, H. (2021). Knowledge Graph Quality Control: A Survey. Fundamental Research. 10.1016/j.fmre.2021.08.018
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Alexandra Oliveira Matias Ferreira
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
