Presenteeism and health perception of industrial workers: a scoping review protocol
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i5.28703Keywords:
Health Status; Presenteeism; Health teaching; Occupational Health; Industry workers.Abstract
Aim: Map and examine scientific evidence on aspects related to presenteeism and negative health perception of industry workers. Method: The protocol was developed based on the guidelines of the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) by the Population, Concept and Context (PCC) strategy, and is registered in the Open Science Framework under DOI https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/J5UN6. In addition, it will meet the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Meta-Analyses-Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). This protocol will guide the development of the scope review for the mapping of presenteeism in the industrial segment evidenced in the national and international literature, whose search will be carried out in electronic databases (MEDLINE/Pubmed, Scielo, Thesis and Dissertations Catalog of the CAPES and Google Scholar); no year or language limits will be applied, and empirical studies that investigate aspects related to presenteeism and negative health perception in industry workers will be included. Results: The results of this study will enable the presentation of scientific evidence, as well as directions for future research on the research topic. Conclusion: This study is essential for the beginning of a research process that aims to investigate issues related to presenteeism and the negative perception of health among industry workers.
References
Colquhoun, H.L., Levac, D., O’Brien, K.K., Straus, S., Tricco, A.C., Perrier, L. et al. (2014) Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. J Clin Epidemiol 67(12):1291–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013.
Cordeiro, L., Soares, C.B. (2019) Revisão de escopo: potencialidades para a síntese de metodologias utilizadas em pesquisa primária qualitativa. BIS - Bol Inst Saúde 18:37–43. https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/biblio-1021863.
Hernandez, J.D. (2007) Impactos da percepção de saúde organizacional no bem-estar no trabalho. http://repositorio.ufu.br/handle/123456789/17283.
Mattos, S., Moreira, T., Florêncio, R. Cestari, V. (2021) Elaboração e validação de um instrumento para mensurar Autopercepção de Saúde em adultos. Saúde em Debate 45(129):366–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-1104202112909.
Paskulin, L.M.G., Bierhals, C.C.B.K., Valer, D.B., Aires, M., Guimarães, N.V., Brocker, A.R. et al. (2012) Health literacy of older people in primary care. Acta Paul Enferm 25(spe1):129–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0103-21002012000800020.
Peters, M., Godfrey, C., McInerney, P., Munn, Z., Trico, A., Khalil, H. (2020) Chapter 11: Scoping Reviews. In: JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-12.
Pie, A.C.S., Fernandes, R.C.P., Carvalho, F.M., Porto, L.A. (2020) Fatores associados ao presenteísmo em trabalhadores da indústria. Rev Bras Saúde Ocup. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-6369000003118.
Pires, C., Cavaco, A., Vigário, M. (2015) Problems identified in the package leaflets of the Portuguese non-generic medicines. Acta Med Port. 28(1):21–8. https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5526.
Presenteeism: At work—but out of it. (2004) Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2004/10/presenteeism-at-work-but-out-of-it.
Santos, B.S., Rocha, F.L.R., Bortolini, J., Terra, F.S., Valim, M.D. (2021) Factors associated with presenteeism in nursing workers. Rev Bras Enferm. 75(1):e20201290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2020-129010.
Santos, M.I.P.O., Portella, M.R. (2016) Condições do letramento funcional em saúde de um grupo de idosos diabéticos. Rev Bras Enferm. 69(1):144–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167.2016690121i.
Sousa, R.A. (2022) Literacia para a saúde: habilidades para lidar com as informações sobre saúde podem ajudar a construir novos caminhos na saúde pública. Reciis – Revista Eletrônica de Comunicação, Informação & Inovação em Saúde. 16(1):175-87. https://www.reciis.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php/reciis/article/view/3221.
Souza, A.S., Alves, G.G., Câmara, S.G., Aerts, D., Hirdes, A., Gedrat, D.C. (2019) Percepção de saúde e felicidade entre trabalhadores da Estratégia Saúde da Família de um município do sul do Brasil. Aletheia. 52(2): 108-21. http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-03942019000200009&lng=pt.
Tricco, A.C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K., Colquhoun, H., Kastner, M. et al. (2016) A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 16(1):15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0116-4.
World Health Organization. (2013) Health Literacy. The Solid Facts. http://www.thehealthwell.info/node/534072.
Zanon, R.E.B., Dalmolin, G.L., Magnago, T.S.B.S., Andolhe, R., Carvalho, R.E.F.L. (2021) Presenteeism and safety culture: evaluation of health workers in a teaching hospital. Rev Bras Enferm. 74(1):e20190463. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0463.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Maria Rosilene Cândido Moreira; Ítalo Emanoel Sousa Chaves; Paulo Roberto Pinheiro Brito; Lucca Feitosa Esmeraldo; Milena Silva Costa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
