Measurement properties of instruments for migraine impact in Brazil: a systematic review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i7.30248Keywords:
Migraine disorders; Brazil; Patient reported outcome measures; Sickness impact profile; Teaching.Abstract
Objective: To critically appraise, compare and summarize the quality of the measurement properties of all Patient-Reported Outcome Measures translated and validated for the Brazilian population that assess the impact of migraine. Background The evaluation of measurement properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures is needed for professionals and researchers to select instruments that ensure quality of results. Thus, reliable instruments are important to provide information on the impact of migraine. Methods: The search was conducted in MEDLINE/Pubmed, Web of Science, LILACS, and Embase databases. We included studies evaluating measurement properties of PROMs that assessed the impact of migraine and were validated for Brazil. Methodological quality, risk of bias, and quality of evidence were assessed following the Consensus-based Standards for Selecting Health Measurement Instruments for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Results: A total of 112 studies identified, and four were included. Three instruments were analyzed: Headache Impact Test, which presented a serious risk of bias with moderate quality of evidence; Pediatric Migraine Disability Assessment, which presented an extremely serious risk of bias and very low quality of evidence; and the Headache Disability Inventory¸ which presented a very serious risk of bias and low quality of evidence. Conclusion: The three instruments evaluated had important limitations regarding quality of evidence. The Headache Impact Test was the most recommended instrument because it presented a moderate quality of evidence.
References
Agosti, R. (2018) Migraine Burden of Disease: From the Patient’s Experience to a Socio-Economic View. Headache, 58: 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13301.
Diamond, I. R. et al. (2014) Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 67 (4): 401–409. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.12.002.
Edwards, R. R. et al. (2006) Catastrophizing and pain in arthritis, fibromyalgia, and other rheumatic diseases. Arthritis Care and Research. 55 (2): 325–332. doi: 10.1002/art.21865.
Ferreira, P. L. et al. (2021) Acesso livre Validade e confiabilidade da versão em português do Migraine Disability Assessment modificado. BMC neurology 1–11. doi: 10.1186/s12883-021-02085-z.
Goadsby, P. J. et al. (2017) Pathophysiology of Migraine: A Disorder of Sensory Processing. Physiological Reviews. 97 (2): 553–622, abr. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00034.2015.
Guyatt, G. H. et al. (2011) GRADE guidelines: A new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64 (4): 380–382. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.011.
Haywood, K. L. et al. (2018) Assessing the impact of headaches and the outcomes of treatment: A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Cephalalgia. 38 (7):1374–1386. doi: 10.1177/0333102417731348.
Martin, M. et al. (2004a) The Short-Form Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) was psychometrically equivalent in nine languages. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 57 (12) :1271–1278. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.05.004.
Martin, M. et al. (2004b) The Short-Form Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) was psychometrically equivalent in nine languages. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 57 (12): 1271–1278, dez. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.05.004.
Mokkink, L. B. et al.(2018a) COSMIN manual for systematic reviews of PROMs, user manual. n. February. 1–78. Retrieved from https://cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-syst-review-for-PROMs-manual_version-1_feb-2018.pdf.
Mokkink, L. B. et al. (2018b) COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Quality of Life Research. 27(5):1171-1179. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4.
Mokkink, L. B. et al. (2019) COSMIN Study Design checklist for Patient-reported outcome measurement instruments. n. July. Retrieved from https://www.cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-study-designing-checklist_final.pdf.
Pradela, J. et al. (2021a) Brazilian Portuguese version of the Headache Disability Inventory: Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability. Cephalalgia. 41 (2):156–165. doi: 10.1177/0333102420949860.
Pradela, J. et al. (2021b) Measurement properties of the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6TM Brazil) in primary and secondary headaches. Headache. 61 (3): 527–535. doi: 10.1111/head.14049.
Prinsen, C. A. C. et al. (2018a) COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research. (27) 5: 1147–1157. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3.
Prinsen, C. A. C. et al. (2018b) COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research. 27 (5): 1147–1157, 12 maio. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3
Queiroz, L. P.; Silva Junior, A. A. (2015) The prevalence and impact of headache in Brazil. Headache. 55 (S1): 32–38. doi: 10.1111/head.12511.
Sampaio Rocha-Filho, P. A.; Hershey, A. D. (2017) Pediatric Migraine Disability Assessment (PedMIDAS): Translation Into Brazilian Portuguese and Cross-Cultural Adaptation. Headache. 57 (9): 1409–1415. https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13159.
Steiner, T. J. et al. (2018) Migraine is first cause of disability in under 50s : will health politicians now take notice ? J Headache Pain Feb 21;19(1):17.
doi: 10.1186/s10194-018-0846-2..
Steiner, T. J. et al.(2020) Migraine remains second among the world’s causes of disability, and first among young women: findings from GBD2019. The Journal of Headache and Pain. 21 (1): 137, 2 dez. doi: 10.1186/s10194-020-01208-0.
Stewart, W. F. et al. (2000) Validity of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score in comparison to a diary-based measure in a population sample of migraine sufferers. Pain. 88 (1): 41–52. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00305-5.
Terwee, C. B. et al. (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 60 (1): 34–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012.
Terwee, C. B. et al. (2012) Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Quality of Life Research. 21 (4): 651–657, 6 maio. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9960-1.
Winser, S. J. et al. (2019) Measures of balance and falls risk prediction in people with Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review of psychometric properties. Clinical Rehabilitation. 33 (12):1949–1962, 1 dez. doi: 10.1177/0269215519877498.
Yang, M. et al. (2011) Validation of the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6TM) across episodic and chronic migraine. Cephalalgia. 31 (3): 357–367, 6 fev. doi: 10.1177/0333102410379890.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Mayara Cristina de Menezes; Andrea Lemos Bezerra de Oliveira; Hugo Gabriel Feitosa de Souza; Renata Crespo Simas Toscano; Daniella Araújo de Oliveira
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
