Artificial meat production as a sustainable alternative: Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i7.30346Keywords:
Artificial meat; Sustainability; Consumer.Abstract
In recent years, much has been said and sought about sustainability in food production. Artificial meat, for example, is an alternative derived from tissue with cells grown in the laboratory, different from conventional meat, which requires slaughtering animals, in addition to the environmental impacts generated. Since that moment, many companies have already invested in the idea, because, when thinking about this type of technology, it tends to dominate the meat market soon, since our planet Earth no longer has the law of demand and searches for environmental resources used in production. of food. It is necessary that alternative techniques of animal protein production need to be adopted, such as artificial meat, for example, which is an alternative to the environmental problems faced by humanity in this century. In this way, this research aims to provide a recent literature review on the production of artificial meat as a sustainable alternative.
References
Alves, E. S., da Silva, L. A, Saqueti, B. H. F., Artilha, C. A. F., da Silva, D. D. M. B., de Sousa, L. C. S., Scapim, M. R. S., & Visentainer, JV (2020). Proteínas vegetais como alimentos funcionais-revisão. Brazilian Journal of Development, 6, 5869-5879.
Bhat, Z. F., Bhat, H., & Pathak, V. (2014). Prospects for in vitro cultured meat–a future harvest. In Lanza, R., Langer, R., & Vacanti Joseph (Eds.), Principles of tissue engineering (pp. 1663-1683).
Bhat, Z. F., & Bhat, H. (2011). Animal-free meat biofabrication. American Journal of Food Technology, 6, 441–459.
Bhat, Z. F., Kumar, S., & Fayaz, H. (2015). In vitro meat production: Challenges and benefits over conventional meat production. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14, 241-248.
Bonny, S. P. F., Gardner, G. E., Pethick, D. W., & Hocquette, J.-F. (2015). What is artificial meat and what does it mean for the future of the meat industry? Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14, 255–263.
Bonny, S. P. F., Gardner, G. E., Pethick, D. W., & Hocquette, J.-F. (2017). Artificial meat and the future of the meat industry. Animal Production Science, 57, 2216–2223.
Bryant, C., & Barnett, J. (2018). Consumer acceptance of cultured meat: A systematic review. Meat Science, 143, 8–17.
Castro, M. C., Alves, E. S., Saqueti, B. H. F., Alves, J. S., Costa, J. C. M., Bruni, A. R. S., Hussein, Z. E. H., Frigo, G., Santos, O. O., & Visentainer, J. V. (2021). Fatores do bem-estar animal relacionados ao padrão da carne bovina: uma revisão. Research, Society and Development, 10, e330101623847-e330101623847.
Datar, I., & Betti, M. (2010). Possibilities for an in vitro meat production system. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 11, 13–22.
Eiras, C. E., Guerrero, A., Valero, M. V, Pardo, J. A., Ornaghi, M. G., Rivaroli, D. C., Sañudo, C., & Prado, I. N. (2017). Effects of cottonseed hulls levels in the diet and aging time on visual and sensory meat acceptability from young bulls finished in feedlot. Animal, 11, 529–537.
FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2017). Statistical Yearbook, 1.
FAPRI - Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (2020). Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute. Iowa State University and University of Missouri-Columbia. https://www.fapri.missouri.edu/publications/reports/
Ferreira, C. S. R., Saqueti, B. H. F., dos Santos, P. D. S., da Silva, J. M., Matiucci, M. A., Feihrmann, A. C., Mikcha, J. M. G. & Santos, O. O. (2022). Effect of Salvia (Salvia officinalis) on the oxidative stability of salmon hamburgers. LWT, 154, 112867.
Gerber, P., Vellinga, T., Opio, C., & Steinfeld, H. (2011). Productivity gains and greenhouse gas emissions intensity in dairy systems. Livestock Science, 139, 100–108.
Herrero, M., Henderson, B., Havlík, P., Thornton, P. K., Conant, R. T., Smith, P., Wirsenius, S., Hristov, A. N., Gerber, P., & Gill, M. (2016). Greenhouse gas mitigation potentials in the livestock sector. Nature Climate Change, 6, 452.
Herrero, M., Thornton, P. K., Gerber, P., & Reid, R. S. (2009). Livestock, livelihoods and the environment: understanding the trade-offs. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 1, 111–120.
Hristov, A. N., Oh, J., Firkins, J. L., Dijkstra, J., Kebreab, E., Waghorn, G., Makkar, H. P. S., Adesogan, A. T., Yang, W., & Lee, C. (2013). Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: I. A review of enteric methane mitigation options. Journal of Animal Science, 91, 5045–5069.
Llonch, P., Haskell, M. J., Dewhurst, R. J., & Turner, S. P. (2017). Current available strategies to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions in livestock systems: an animal welfare perspective. Animal, 11, 274–284.
Lu, J., Bayne, K., & Wang, J. (2013). Current status of animal welfare and animal rights in China. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, 41, 351–357.
Mancini, M. C., & Antonioli, F. (2019). Exploring consumers’ attitude towards cultured meat in Italy. Meat Science, 150, 101–110.
Mattice, K. D., & Marangoni, A. G. (2020). Comparing methods to produce fibrous material from zein. Food research international, 128, 108804.
Moritz, M. S. M., Verbruggen, S. E. L., & Post, M. J. (2015). Alternatives for large-scale production of cultured beef: A review. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14(2), 208–216.
ONU - Organization United Nations (2015) Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda.
Pereira, A. S., Shitsuka, D. M., Parreira, F. J., & Shitsuka, R. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. UFSM. https://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/handle/1/15824/Lic_Computacao_Metodologia-Pesquisa-Cientifica.pdf?sequence=1.
Post, M J. (2012). Cultured meat from stem cells: Challenges and prospects. Meat Science, 92, 297–301.
Post, M. J. (2014). Cultured beef: medical technology to produce food. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 94, 1039–1041.
Prado, I. N. (2010). Produção de bovinos de corte e qualidade da carne. Eduem. 1.
Specht, L., & Lagally, C. (2017) Mapping emerging industries: opportunities in clean meat. The Good Food Institute. http://tinyurl.com/GFI-clean-meat
Sun, Z., Yu, Q., & Lin, H. A. N. (2015). The environmental prospects of cultured meat in China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14, 234–240.
Tuomisto, H. L., & Mattos, M. J. T. (2011). Environmental impacts of cultured meat production. Environmental Science & Technology, 45, 6117–6123.
Vital, A. C. P., Kempinski, E. M. B. C., Pinto, L. A. M., Nascimento, K. F., Alexandre, S., & Prado, I. N. (2017). Produção de carne in vitro: nova realidade moderna. PUBVET, 11, 840–847.
Wilks, M., & Phillips, C. J. C. (2017). Attitudes to in vitro meat: A survey of potential consumers in the United States. PloS One, 12, e0171904.
Woll, S., & Böhm, I. (2018). In-vitro-meat: a solution for problems of meat production and con-sumption. Ernahrungs Umschau, 65, 12–21.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Cintia Stefhany Ripke Ferreira; Eloize Silva Alves; Joice Camila Martins Costa; Carla Micaela Ripke Ferreira; Jéssica Souza Alves Friedrichsen; Giovana Frigo; Fernanda Silva Baeta; Michele Patricia Felipe; Lucas Ulisses Rovigatti Chiavelli; Oscar Oliveira Santos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
