Peach: Physico-Chemical characteristics and Bioactive Compounds Content

Authors

  • Maria Inês Rodrigues Machado Universidade Federal do Cariri
  • Adriana Rodrigues Machado Laboratório Ibérico Internacional de Nanotecnologia
  • Rui Carlos Zambiazi Universidade Federal de Pelotas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i7.3103

Keywords:

Peach crop; Farming; Harvest.

Abstract

Originating in China, the peach was one of temperate climate species that soon expanded worldwide, and it was also considered a symbol of longevity. Few fruit species have adapted to such diverse climatic situations. Although most producing regions is between latitudes 30º N and 45° S, the peach tree is one of the most important fruit crops in temperate climate explored in Brazil. As other fruits, peach contain bioactive compounds, but still little has been studied about them. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the physicochemical characteristics, focusing on the composition of bioactive compounds, in peach cultivars used in processing industries in the southern region of RS. Therefore, three cultivars of peaches from two seasons 2008/2009 and 2009/2010 were chosen; Santa Aurea, Esmeralda and Maciel. All fruit were obtained from producers of Pelotas / RS, and cultivated by the tracking system of the fruit. Titratable acidity (AT), pH, soluble solids (SS), SS / AT, total carotenoids, individual carotenoids, total phenolic compounds, individual phenolic compounds and total anthocyanin were evaluated. The results showed that the cultivar Esmeralda presented SS / AT: 20.0 (2008/2009) and the Santa Aurea (2009/2010) a ratio of SS / AT: 17.2. Regarding the acidity, the cultivar that stood out was also the Esmeralda. Cultivar Emerald also showed a higher content of gallic acid in relation to other cultivars in both harvest period. Regarding the content of carotenoids, the Emerald (6.72 mg β-caroteno.100g-1) and Maciel (5.97 mg β- caroteno.100g-1) cultivars showed higher values, both in 2009/2010 harvest.

Author Biographies

Maria Inês Rodrigues Machado, Universidade Federal do Cariri

Departamento de Agronomia

Adriana Rodrigues Machado, Laboratório Ibérico Internacional de Nanotecnologia

Food processing goup

Rui Carlos Zambiazi, Universidade Federal de Pelotas

Centro de ciências Quimicas Farmacêuticas e de Alimentos

References

Bialves, TS, Araujo, VF, Vizzotto, M & Raseira, BMC. (2012). Genótipos de Pêssego: Compostos Bioativos e Atividades Antioxidante, CIC – Pelotas, 21º CIC Pelotas, 4º Mostra Científica, Anais, UFPel.

Bonghi, C et al. (1999). Peach fruit ripening and quality in relation to picking time, and hypoxic and high CO2 short-term postharvest treatments. Postharvest Biology.BRASIL. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Portaria no 76, de 27 novembro 1986. Diário Oficial [da] Republica Federativa do Brasil, Brasília, 1986. Seção I, 18152-18173.

Cantillano, FF. (2003). Pós-colheita em Fruteiras de Caroço. In: Monteiro L. B., De Mio L. L. M., Monte Serrat, B., Cuquel, F. L. (2003). Fruteiras de caroço: uma visão ecológica. Curitiba: Universidade Federal do Paraná, 317-332.

Cantillano,RFF, Castañeda, LMF, Treptow, RO & Schuneman, NAPP. (2008).Qualidade físico-química e sensorial de cultivares de morango durante o armazenamento refrigerado - Pelotas: Embrapa Clima Temperado, (Embrapa Clima Temperado. Boletim de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento, 75, 29.

Carneiro, APG, Costa, EA, Soares, DJ, Moura, SM & Constant, PBL. (2012). Caracterização Físico-Química dos Frutos in natura e Geléias de Morango e Pêssego e Aspectos de Rotulagem do Produto ao Consumidor, Revista Brasileira de Produtos Agroindustriais, 14(3), 295- 298, 295. ISSN 1517-8595.

Cereta, M. (1999). Qualidade do pêssego, cv. Eldorado, armazenado em atmosfera controlada. Pelotas – RS. 46f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Agronomia) - Programa de Pós-graduação em Agronomia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas.

Chitarra, IMF & Chitarra, AB. (2019). Pós-colheita de frutas e hortaliças: Fisiologia e Manuseio, 2.ed. Lavras: UFLA, 2005, 235-267.

Coelho, AHR. (1994).Qualidade pós-colheita de pêssegos. Infor. Agropecuário, 17(180):5-9

Costa, AC. (2010). Estudo de conservação de pêssego [Prunus pérsica (L) Batsch] minimamente processado, Pelotas,.-78f., Tese (Doutorado) –Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência e Tecnologia Agroindustrial. Faculdade de Agronomia Eliseu.

Ferrer, A et al. (2005). Changes during the ripening of the very late season Spanish peach cultivar ‘Calanda’ Feasibility of using CIELAB coordinates as maturity indices. Scientia Horticulturae, 105(4): 435-446.

Hakkinen, SH, Karenlampi, SO, Heinonen, IM, Mykkanen, HM, & Torronen, AR. (1998). HPLC method for screening of flavonoids and phenolic acids in berries. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 77(1): 543–551.

Instituto Adolfo Lutz, Normas Analíticas do Instituto Adolfo Lutz (1985). Métodos Químicos e Físicos para Análise de Alimentos, 1, 3. ed. São Paulo: Instituto Adolfo Lutz, 533.

Jacques , AC, Pertuzatti, PB, Barcia, MT & Zambiazi, RC, (2009). Doce em Massa de Amora Preta (RUBUS SPP): Análise Sensorial e de Fitoquímicos,Alimentos e Nutrição., Araraquara,20(4): 625-631.

João, LP, Rosa, JI, Ferri, VC & Martinello, MD (2002). Levantamento da Fruticultura Comercial do Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre: Emater-RS/Ascar, 55-58.

Kader, AA (1986). Biochemical and physiological basis for effects of controlled and modified atmospheres on fruits and vegetables. Food Technology, 40( 5): 99-104.

Kader, A. A. Fruit maturity, ripening and quality relationships. Acta Horticulture, Wageningen, n. 485, p. 203-208, 1999.

Lees, DH, Francis, FJ. (1972). Standardization of pigment analysis in Cranberries. Hortiscience, 7(1): 83-84.

Machado, MIR, Lameiro, MG, Machado, AR, Zambiazi, RC & Feitosa, JV. (2019). Avaliação de compostos bioativos em pessegada. Segurança Alimentar E Nutricional, 26, e019015-e019015.

Machado, MIR, Machado, AR. & Zambiazi, RC. (2017). Caracterização da polpa de pêssego após a estocagem. Revista SODEBRAS, 12 (136),152-167, ISSN 1809-3957.

Manzoor M, Anwar F, Mahmood Z, Rashid U & Ashraf M.(2012). Variation in minerals, phenolics and antioxidant activity of peel and pulp of different varieties of peach (Prunus persica L.) fruit from Pakistan. Molecules , 17(6): 6491506.

Pereira, AS et al. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. [e-book]. Santa Maria. Ed. UAB / NTE / UFSM. Acesso em: 04 maio 2020. Disponível em: https: // repositorio. ufsm. Br / bitstream / handle / 1 / 15824/Lic_Computacao_Metodologia-Pesquisa-Cientifica.pdf?sequence=1.

Raseira, MCB & Nakasu, BH. (1998). Cultivares: descrição e recomendação. In: Medeiros, C.A.B., Raseira, M.C.B.(Eds.). A Cultura do Pessegueiro. Brasília: Embrapa-SPI, Pelotas: Embrapa - CPACT, 20-28.

Raseira, MC, Bassols & RCF. (2012). "Melhoramento genético e cultivares de amora-preta e mirtilo”. Informe Agropecuário, Belo Horizonte 33.268:11-20.

Rodriguez-Amaya, DB (1999). Changes in carotenoids during processing and storage of foods. Arch. Latinoamerican Nutrition, 49:38S-47S.

Rodriguez-Amaya, DB (2001). A Guide to Carotenoid Analysis in Foods. ILSI Press. USA.

Rombaldi, C.V. et al.(2002).Armazenamento de pêssegos (Prunus persica L.), cultivar Chiripá, em atmosfera controlada. Ciência Rural, 32(1), 43-47.

Scariotto, S (2011). Fenologia e componentes de rendimento de pessegueiro em condições subtropicais (Dissertação (Mestrado). Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná.

Sellappan, S, Akoh, CC & Krewer, G (2002).Phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacity of Georgia-grown blueberries and blackberries. Journal Agriculture Food Chemistry, 50(8), 2432-2438.

Singleton, VL & Rossi, JÁ (1965).Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagent. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 16,144-158.

Statistica. (2004).Statsoft (data analysis software system) versin 7 for Windows.www.statsoft.com.

Torrezan, R (2000). Recomendações técnicas para a produção de frutas em calda em escala industrial. Rio de Janeiro: Embrapa Agroindústria de Alimentos, 39.

Trevisan, R, Herte, RFG, Coutinho, EF, Gonçalves, ED, Silveira, CAPE & Freire, CJS. (2006). Uso de poda verde, plásticos refletivos, antitranspirante e potássio na produção de pêssegos. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, 41(10): 1485-1490.

Versari, A, Castellari, M, Parpinello, GP, Riponi C. & Galassi ,S. (2002). Characterization of peach juices obtained from cultivars Redhaven, Suncrest and Maria Marta grown in Italy. Food Chemistry, 76: 1815. 2.

Vizzotto, M, Cisneros-Zevallos, L & Byrne, DH. (2007). Large variation found in the phytochemical and antioxidant activity of peach and plum germplasm. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 132(3): 334– 340.

Yangılar, F. (2016) Production and evaluation of mineral and nutrient contents, chemical composition, and sensory properties of ice creams fortified with laboratoryprepared peach fibre, Food & Nutrition Research, 60:1, 31882, DOI: 10.3402/fnr.v60.31882.

Downloads

Published

05/05/2020

How to Cite

MACHADO, M. I. R.; MACHADO, A. R.; ZAMBIAZI, R. C. Peach: Physico-Chemical characteristics and Bioactive Compounds Content. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 9, n. 7, p. e216973103, 2020. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v9i7.3103. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3103. Acesso em: 25 apr. 2024.

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 7

Section

Agrarian and Biological Sciences

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.