Identification of cervical self-collection as a cervical cancer screening tool
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i8.31214Keywords:
Cervical cancer; Human papilloma virus; Auto-collection; Diagnosis.Abstract
Cervical cancer is caused solely by the persistent infection of the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) considered the etiological agent of the disease and transmitted through unprotected sexual intercourse. Cervical self-collection is an alternative to increase the coverage of screening programs in several countries. Some articles were verified that demonstrate the acceptability of this self-collection device, showing the ability to overcome barriers that prevent efficient cervical screening. Currently, studies have been identified around the world that demonstrate the need to implement alternative technologies that facilitate cervical collection and that increase the detection capacity by molecular pathways to minimize the intervention time to minimize the evolution of HPV infection and evolution. for cervical cancer.
References
Allen-Leigh, B. et al. (2017).Barriers to HPV self-sampling and cytology among low-income indigenous women in rural areas of a middle-income setting: a qualitative study. Bmc Cancer. 17. ISSN 1471-2407.
Andersson, S., Belkić, K., Safer-Demirbuker ,S., Mints, M., Ostensson, E.(2017). Perceived cervical cancer risk among women treated for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: The importance of specific knowledge. PLOS One .12,190-156.
Arbyn, M., Verdoodt, F., Snijders, P., Verhoef, V., Suonio,E., Dillner,L., et al.(2014). Accuracy of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol . 15, 172–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70570-9 PMID: 24433684.
Arbyn, M., Smith, S.B., Temin, S., Sultana. F., Castle, P. (2018). Collaboration on Self-Sampling and HPV Testing. Detecting cervical precancer and reaching underscreened women by using HPV testing on self-samples: updated meta-analyses. BMJ. 36(3),48-23.
Adcock, A., Cram,F., Lawton, B., et al.92019). Acceptability of self-taken vaginal HPV sample for cervical screening among na under-screened Indigenous population. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1–7.
Behnamfar, F. & Azadehrah, M. (2015).Factors associated with delayed diagnosis of cervical cancer: a survey in isfahan city. international journal of gynecological cancer. 25(9), 1551-1551. ISSN 1048-891X.
Brasil. (2021) .Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Câncer do colo do útero. https://www.inca.gov.br/tipos-de-cancer/cancer-do-colo-do-utero>.
Brasil. (2021). Minitério da Saúde. Diretrizes Brasileiras para o Rastreamento do Câncer do Colo do Útero. 2º ed. http://www.citologiaclinica.org.br/site/pdf/documentos/diretrizes-para-o-rastreamentodo-cancer-do-colo-do-utero_2016.pdf>.
Bishop, E., Katz, M. L., Reiter, P. L. (2019). Acceptability of Human Papillomavirus Self-Sampling Among a National Sample of Women in the United States. Bioresearch Open Access. 8(1), 65-73, Apr 2019. ISSN 2164-7860.
Chou, H. H. et al. (2016). Self-sampling HPV test in women not undergoing Pap smear for more than 5 years and factors associated with under-screening in Taiwan. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association. 115(12), 1089-1096.
Connolly, D., Hughes. X., Berner, A.(2020). Barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer screening among transgender men and non-binary people with a cervix: A systematic narrative review. Preventive Medicine. 135.
Crofts, V., Flahault, E., Tebeu, P.M. (2015). Untiet S, Fosso GK, Boulvain M, Vassilakos P,Petignat P. Education efforts may contribute to wider acceptance of human papillomavirus self-sampling. Int J Womens Health. 7,149–54.
Fall, N. S. et al. Feasibility, Acceptability, and Accuracy of Vaginal Self-Sampling for Screening Human Papillomavirus Types in Women from Rural Areas in Senegal. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 100(6).
Gil, A.C. (2019). Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. 7. ed. São Paulo: Atlas.
Jones, H., Brudney, K., Sawo, D. et al. (2012). The acceptability of a self-lavaging device compared to pelvic examination for cervical cancer screening among low-income women. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 21,1275–81.
León-Maldonado. L., Wentzell, E., Brown, B., Allen-Leigh, B., Torres-Ibarra ,L.,Salmerón ,J, et al.(2016) Perceptions and experiences of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and testing among low-income Mexican women. PLoS One.11(5),0153367.
León-Maldonado, L., Allen-Leigh, B., Lazcano-Ponce, E.(2014). Consejería en la detección de VPH como prueba de tamizaje de cáncer cervical: un estudio cualitativo sobre necesidades de mujeres de Michoacán, México. [Counseling for HPV detection when used to screen for cervical cancer: a qualitative study on theneeds of women from Michoacan, Mexico]. Salud Publica Mex. 56,519–27.
LorenzI., Noely., Paula-Cristina(2019). Autocoleta cervicovaginal no rastreamento do câncer de colo do útero: aceitabilidade, detecção de papilomavírus humano de alto risco oncogênico e pesquisa de biomarcadores. f. 168. Tese. Doutorado em Ciências pelo Programa de Obstetrícia e Ginecologia da Universidade de São Paulo.
Modibbo, F. et al.(2017). Randomized trial evaluating self-sampling for HPV DNA based tests for cervical cancer screening in Nigeria. Infectious Agents and Cancer. 12, ISSN 1750-9378.
MiyasakI, M. T. A & BRITO, L. C. (2021). A importância do diagnóstico primário de lesões sugestivas de efeito citopático compatível com HPV em colo uterino –Uma breve revisão. Brazilian Journal of Development. 7 (7).
Menêses, M. S. L., Toralles, M. B. P., Mendes, C. M. C. (2019). Evolução da técnica de PCR: sua contribuição no diagnóstico da infecção por HPV. Revista de Ciências Médicas e Biológicas. 18(3), 361-366.
Madzima, T. R., Vahabi, M., Lofters, A. (2017). Emerging role of HPV self-sampling incervical cancer screening for hard-to-reach women: focused literaturereview. Can Fam Physician. 63,597–601.
Morgan, K. et al. (2019). Acceptability of Women Self-Sampling versus Clinician-Collected Samples for HPV DNA Testing: A Systematic Review. Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease. 23(3), 193-199. ISSN 1089-2591.
Mendes, K.D.S. et al. (2011). Revisão integrativa: método de pesquisa para a incorporação de evidências na saúde e na enfermagem.
Othman, N.H., Zaki, F.H.M. (2014). Self-collection tools for routine cervical Cancer screening: a review. Asian Pacific J Canc Prevent. 15.
Polman, N. J. et al. (2019). Experience with HPV self-sampling and clinician-based sampling in women attending routine cervical screening in the Netherlands. Preventive medicine. 125, 5-11. ISSN 0091-7435.
Penaranda, E., Molokwu, J., Flores,S., Byrd, T., Brown, L., Shokar, N(2015). Women's attitudes toward Cervicovaginal self-sampling for high-risk HPV infectionon the US-Mexico border. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 19(4),323–8.
Reiter, L., Richardson, M., Zimmermann, B.J, et al. (2016). Acceptability of human papillomavirus self-test devices among women from high-risk populations. J Womens Health, Issues Care.5.
Saslow, D., Solomon, D., Lawson, H. W. et al (2012). American Cancer Society,American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer. CA Cancer J Clin.62,147–172.
Snijders, P. J., Verhoef, V. M., Arbyn, M., Ogilvie, G., Minozzi, S., Banzi, R., van-Kemenade, F. J., Heideman, D. A., Meijer, C. J., High-risk. (2013). HPV. Testing on self-sampled versus clinician-collected specimens: a review on the clinical accuracy and impact on population attendance in cervical cancer screening. Int J Cancer. 132(10),2223–36.
Sultana, F., Mullins, R., English, D.R., et al. (2015). Women’s experience with homebased self-sampling for human papillomavirus testing. BMC Cancer.15,849.
Schiffman, M. et al. (2016). Carcinogenic human papillomavirus infection. Nature Reviews Disease Primers. 2. ISSN 2056-676X.
Sena-Alysson-Bastos. (2019). Análise do desempenho de tecnologias alternativas para rastreio de lesões precursoras e de câncer invasivo de colo de útero. f. 123. Dissertação. Mestrado. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Imunologia Básica e Aplicada do Instituto de Ciências Biológicas da Universidade Federal do Amazonas. Manaus.
Souza, G. D. C. S. et al. (2015). Papillomavirus human: viral biology and carcinogenesis. Revista FEMINA. Faculdade de Ciências Médicas – Belo Horizonte (MG), Brasil.
Tamalet, C. et al. (2016) Genotyping and follow-up of HR-HPV types detected by self-sampling in women from low socioeconomic groups not participating in regular cervical cancer screening in France. Journal of Clinical Virology. 78, 102-107. ISSN 1386-6532.
Torres, K. L. et al. (2018). Self-sampling coupled to the detection of HPV 16 and 18 E6 protein: A promising option for detection of cervical malignancies in remote areas. Plos One.13(7). ISSN 1932- 6203.
World Health Organization (WHO).(2020).WHO recommendations on self-care interventions. Human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling as part of cervical cancer screening.
Yet, P. T et al.(2019).Self-sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Global Health. 4.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Carliane Anunciação de Souza; Alysson Bastos Sena
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
