Avaliação da indicação cirúrgica de conização clássica e resultados anatomopatológicos em pacientes com lesão intraepitelial cervical ou câncer do colo do útero

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i13.31215

Keywords:

Squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix; Uterine cervical neoplasms; Conization.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the concordance between indication of cold knife conization by cervical cytology (CC), biopsy, or large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ), and the anatomopathological report of surgical specimens of patients with precancerous lesions of the cervix or cervical cancer. In addition, to observe the presence of residual lesion after LLETZ in cases of microinvasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and margins with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL). To this end, a retrospective study was conducted involving 82 women with cervical intraepithelial lesions or cancer aged between 28 and 71 years. Women had either CC, biopsy, or LLETZ between January 2014 and January 2020 and had cold knife conization indicated according to procedure results. Surgical indication was the result of CC in 30.5% of patients; in 12.2%, it was due to cervical biopsy, and in 24.4% of cases, it was due to CC confirmed by biopsy. Moreover, 32.9% of patients had the surgery done because of compromised margins after LLETZ procedure. Agreement was found in 57.3% of surgical indications, and 42.7% did not show concordance. Residual lesion was observed in 55.6% of women who underwent LLETZ, but in the group of microinvasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), there was a rate of 60% of no residual lesion. Therefore, it indicates that LLETZ appears to be an effective treatment for microinvasive SCC of the cervix, and a complementary surgery with cold knife conization seems not to be required when there are compromised margins with HSIL.

References

American Cancer Society. (2022). Key statistics for cervical cancer. https://www.cancer.org/cancer/cervical-cancer/about/key-statistics.html

American Cancer Society. (2021). Cancer statistic center – estimated new cases. https://cancerstatisticscenter.cancer.org/#!/data-analysis/NewCaseEstimates

American Cancer Society. (2020). Facts & Figures 2020 Reports Largest One-year Drop in Cancer Mortality. https://www.cancer.org/latest-news/facts-and-figures-2020.html

Basu, P., Taghavi, K., Hu, S. Y., Mogri, S., & Joshi, S. (2018). Management of cervical premalignant lesions. Current Problems in Cancer, 42 (2), 129-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2018.01.010.

Bean, L. M., Ward, K. K., Plaxe, S. C., & McHale, M. (2017). Survival of women with microinvasive adenocarcinoma of the cervix is not improved by radical surgery. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 217, 332.e1-332.e6. https://doi.org /10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.021

Beerman, H., van Dorst, E. B. L., Kuenen-Boumeester, V., & Hogendoorn P. C. W. (2009). Superior performance of liquid-based versus conventional cytology in a population-based cervical cancer screening program. Gynecologic Oncology, 112 (3), 572-576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.12.012.

Bekos, C., Schwameis, R., Heinze ,G., Gärner, M., Grimm, C., Joura, E., Horvat, R., Polterauer, S., & Polterauer, M. (2018). Influence of age on histologic outcome of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia during observational management: results from large cohort, systematic review, meta-analysis. Scientific Reports, 8 (1), 6383. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24882-2.

Bryson, P., Stulberg, R., Shepherd, L., McLelland, K. & Jeffrey, J. (2004). Is electrosurgical loop excision with negative margins sufficient treatment for cervical ACIS? Gynecologic Oncology, 93 (2), 465-468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.01.028.

Chen, J. Y., Wang, Z. L., Wang, Z. Y., & Yang, X. Y. (2018). The risk factors of residual lesions and recurrence of the high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) patients with positive-margin after conization. Medicine (Baltimore), 97 (41), e12792. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012792

Cooper, D. B., Carugno, J., & Menefee, G. W. (2021). Conization of cervix. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK441845/

Dantas, D. B., da Luz Costa, T., da Silva, A. S. A., de Campos Gomes, F., & de Melo-Neto, J. S. (2020). Mortality from cervical cancer in Brazil: an ecological epidemiologic study of a 22-year analysis. Ecancermedicalscience, 14, 1064-1076. https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2020.1064.

El-Nashar, S. A., Shazly, S. A., Hopkins, M. R., Bakkum-Gamez, J., & Famuyide, A. O. (2017). Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Instead of Cold-Knife Conization for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Women With Unsatisfactory Colposcopic Examinations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, 21 (2), 129-136.

Feng, Y., Zhang, Z., Lou, T., Wang, S., Bai, H., & Zhang, Z. (2018). The safety of fertility preservation for microinvasive cervical adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 298 (3), 465-475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4799-0.

Hartman, C. A., Bragança, J. F., Gurgel, M. S. C., Zeferino, L. C., Andrade, L. A. L. A., & Teixeira, J. C. (2021). Conservative treatment of microinvasive squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix stage IA1: Defining conization height to an optimal oncological outcome. PLoS One, 16 (7), e0253998-e0253400. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253998.

Hefler, L. A., Polterauer, S., Schneitter, A., Concin, N., Hofstetter, G., Bentz, E., Leipold, H., Tempfer, C., & Reinthaller, A. (2010). Repeat surgery in patients with cervical cancer stage FIGO IA1: a series of 156 cases and a review of the literature. Anticancer Research, 30 (2), 565-568.

INCA. Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva. (2022). Tipos de câncer – câncer do colo do útero. https://www.inca.gov.br/tipos-de-cancer/cancer-do-colo-do-utero

INCA. Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva. (2020). Estimativa 2020: incidência de câncer no Brasil. https://www.inca.gov.br/sites/ufu.sti.inca.local/files/media/document/estimativa-2020-incidencia-de-cancer-no-brasil.pdf

INCA. Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva. (2016). Diretrizes brasileiras para o rastreamento do câncer do colo do útero. (2a ed.). INCA. https://www.inca.gov.br/publicacoes/livros/diretrizes-brasileiras-para-o-rastreamento-do-cancer-do-colo-do-utero

INCA. Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva. (2013). Informativo detecção precoce: monitoramento das ações de controle dos cânceres do colo do útero e de mama. https://www.inca.gov.br/sites/ufu.sti.inca.local/files//media/document//informativo-deteccao-precoce-1-2013.pdf#:~:text=O%20Informativo%20Detec%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20Precoce%20%C3%A9%20uma%20estrat%C3%A9gia%20de,c%C3%A2nceres%20do%20colo%20do%20%C3%BAtero%20e%20de%20mama.

Jiang, Y. M., Chen, C. X., & Li, L. (2016). Meta-analysis of cold-knife conization versus loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Onco Targets and Therapy, 9, 3907-3915. https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S108832.

Kalliala, I., Athanasiou, A., Veroniki, A. A., Salanti, G., Efthimiou, O., Raftis, N., Bowden, S., Paraskevaidi, M., Aro, K., Arbyn, M., Bennett, P., Nieminen, P., Paraskevaidis, E., & Kyrgiou, M. (2020). Incidence and mortality from cervical cancer and other malignancies after treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Annals of Oncology, 31 (2), 213-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2019.11.004.

Lee, S. W., Kim, Y. M., Son, W. S., You, H. J., Kim, D. Y., Kim, J. H., Kim, Y. T., & Nam, J. H. (2009). The efficacy of conservative management after conization in patients with stage IA1 microinvasive cervical carcinoma. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 88 (2), 209-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016340802596009.

Lindsay, R., Burton, K., Shanbhag, S., Tolhurst, J., Millan, D., & Siddiqui, N. (2014). Fertility conserving management of early cervical cancer: our experience of LLETZ and pelvic lymph node dissection. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 24 (1), 118-123. https://doi.org/ 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000023.

McClung, N. M., Gargano, J. W., Park, I. U., Whitney, E., Abdullah, N., Ehlers, S., Bennett, N. M., Scahill, M., Niccolai, L.M., Brackney, M., Griffin, M. R., Pemmaraju, M., Querec, T. D., Cleveland, A. A., Unger, E. R., Markowitz, L. E. (2019). Estimated Number of Cases of High-Grade Cervical Lesions Diagnosed Among Women - United States, 2008 and 2016. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 68 (15), 337-343. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6815a1.

National Cancer Institute. (2021). HPV and cancer. https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/infectious-agents/hpv-and-cancer

Oliveira, M. M., Andrade, S. S. C. A., Oliveira, P. P. V., Silva, G. A. E., Silva, M. M. A. D., Malta, D. C. (2018). Pap-test coverage in women aged 25 to 64 years old, according to the National Health Survey and the Surveillance System for Risk and Protective Factors for Chronic Diseases by Telephone Survey, 2013. Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, 21, e180014. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-549720180014.

Salib, M. Y., Russel, J. H. B., Stewart, V. R., Sudderuddin, S. A., Barwick, T. D., Rockall, A. G., Bhaewani, N. (2020). 2018 FIGO Staging Classification for Cervical Cancer: Added Benefits of Imaging. RadioGraphics, 40 (6), 1807-1822. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2020200013.

Schwarz, T. M., Kolben, T., Gallwas, J., Crispin, A., & Dannecker, C. (2015). Comparison of two surgical methods for the treatment of CIN: classical LLETZ (large-loop excision of the transformation zone) versus isolated resection of the colposcopic apparent lesion - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials, 16, 225. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0736-8

Sparić, R., Tinelli, A., Guido, M., Stefanović, R., Babović, I., & Kesić, V. (2016). The role of surgeonsʼ colposcopic experience in obtaining adequate samples by large loop excision of the transformation zone in women of reproductive age. Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 76 (12), 1339-1344. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-113773

Spoozak, L., Lewin, S. N., Burke, W. M., Deutsch, I., Sun, X., Herzog, T. J., & Wright, J. D. (2012). Microinvasive adenocarcinoma of the cervix. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 206 (1), 80.e1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2011.07.029.

Sykes, P. H., Harker, D. Y., Miller, A., Whitehead, M., Neal, H., Wells, J. E., & Peddie, D. (2008). A randomised comparison of SurePath liquid-based cytology and conventional smear cytology in a colposcopy clinic setting. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 115 (11), 1375-1381. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01865.x.

Teixeira, J. C. , Maestri, C. A., Machado, H. D. C., Zeferino, L. C., & Carvalho, N. S. (2018). Cervical cancer registered in two developed regions from Brazil: upper limit of reachable results from opportunistic screening. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, 40 (6), 347-53. https://doi.org/ 10.1055/s-0038-1660841.

Yang, E. J., Kim, N. R., Choi, J. Y., Kim, W. Y., & Lee, S. J. (2020). Loop electrosurgical excision procedure combined with cold coagulation for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and adenocarcinoma in-situ: a feasible treatment with a low risk of residual/recurrent disease. Infectious Agents and Cancer, 15, 58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13027-020-00326-3.

Yap, S. J., Nathan, E., & Farrell, L. (2020). LLETZ make it simple: Anxiety, pain and treatment outcomes with outpatient large loop excision of the transformation zone under local anaesthesia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 60 (3), 438-443. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13121.

Downloads

Published

04/10/2022

How to Cite

MORAES, B. B. M. .; UYEDA , M. G. B. K. .; MATTOS, P. N. B.; ALMEIDA , B. C. de .; CAMPOS , M. L. P. .; FOCCHI, G. R. de A. .; SPECK , N. M. G. .; TSO, F. K. Avaliação da indicação cirúrgica de conização clássica e resultados anatomopatológicos em pacientes com lesão intraepitelial cervical ou câncer do colo do útero . Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 11, n. 13, p. e383111331215, 2022. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v11i13.31215. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/31215. Acesso em: 16 nov. 2024.

Issue

Section

Health Sciences