Evaluation of the cutting capacity of WaveOne Gold and W-file files after the fourth use
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i8.31376Keywords:
Endodontics; Modeling; Conservative.Abstract
The search for improvements in the quality of endodontic preparations allowed the evolution of instruments that were manual for mechanized instruments. This study sought to compare the performance of reciprocating files after the fourth use, observing the modeling potential, cleaning efficiency in simulated root canals, taking into account procedural errors. Seventy-two acrylic blocks were used, divided into two groups: Waveone Gold and W-file. o The groups were subdivided into 4 according to the number of uses. Black Nankin paint was used to fill these blocks, which were covered with aluminum foil, so that there was no influence on the operator's handling. Irrigation was performed with distilled water to eliminate debris. Pre- and post-instrumentation images were performed to compare before and after instrumentation. For statistical information, tests such as Shapiro-wilk, for independent samples and Mann Whitney were used. Among the experimental and limited conditions of the present study, after the fourth use, it was possible to observe that there were some significant differences and that the W-file instrument proved to be more conservative and with greater centralization when compared to the WaveOne Gold.
References
Calefi, P. H. S., Osaki, R. B., Dal Evedove, N. F., Cruz, V. M., de Andrade, F. B., & Alcalde, M. P. (2020). Cyclic and torcional fatigue resistance of W File and X1 Blue file reciprocating instruments. Dental Press Endodontics, 10(2), 60-66.
Da Graça, E. V., & Paiva, S. S. M. (2020). Limas Reciprocantes No Canal Radicular. Cadernos De Odontologia do UNIFESO, 1(2).
De Carvalho, A. D. M., da Silva, M. R., Rodrigues, M. A., de Oliveira Junior, E. S., Souza, C. C., Rosas, C. A. P., & da Silva Limoeiro, A. G. (2021). Evaluation of the cutting ability of two reciprocating instruments (WaveOne Gold e W-file). Research, Society and Development, 10(14), e207101421900-e207101421900.
De Medeiros, J. M. F., Haddad Filho, M. S., Habitante, S. M., da Rosa, L. C. L., Salum, G., & Almeida, E. T. D. C. (2017). Perda de corte da lima protaper quanto a esterilização e número de uso. Revista de Odontologia da Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, 23(3), 228-237.
Dummer, P. M. H., Alodeh, M. H. A., & Al‐Omari, M. A. O. (1991). A method for the construction of simulated root canals in clear resin blocks. International endodontic Journal, 24(2), 63-66.
Gayoso, G. R. (2014). Instrumentos de reciprocicagem: WaveOne e Reciproc. 2014. 45f (Doctoral dissertation, Dissertação (Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba) -Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas).
Hansel, R. (2016). Movimento reciprocante-sistemas Reciproc e Waveone: revisão de literatura.
Hülsmann, M., Gressmann, G., & Schäfers, F. (2003). A comparative study of root canal preparation using FlexMaster and HERO 642 rotary Ni–Ti instruments. International Endodontic Journal, 36(5), 358-366.
Kandaswamy, D., Venkateshbabu, N., Porkodi, I., & Pradeep, G. (2009). Canal-centering ability: An endodontic challenge. Journal of conservative dentistry: JCD, 12(1), 3.
Keskin, C., Demiral, M., & Sarıyılmaz, E. (2018). Comparison of the shaping ability of novel thermally treated reciprocating instruments. Restorative dentistry & endodontics, 43(2).
Lim, Y. J., Park, S. J., Kim, H. C., & Min, K. S. (2013). Comparison of the centering ability of Wave· One and Reciproc nickel-titanium instruments in simulated curved canals. Restorative dentistry & endodontics, 38(1), 21-25.
Lima, L. C. (2021). Instrumentação com sistema reciprocante: revisão de literatura.
Martins, R. D. C., Bahia, M. G. D. A., & Buono, V. T. L. (2010). Geometric and dimensional characteristics of simulated curved canals prepared with ProTaper instruments. Journal of Applied Oral Science, 18, 44-49.
Paleker, F., & van der Vyver, P. J. (2017). Glide path enlargement of mandibular molar canals by using K-files, the ProGlider File, and G-Files: A comparative study of the preparation times. Journal of Endodontics, 43(4), 609-612.
Pelepenko, L. E., Zanin, E., Langaro, M. C., Machado, R. L., Fornari, V. J., & Hartmann, M. S. M. (2020). Resistência à fratura de instrumentos reciprocantes WaveOne-Gold e W-File. Full Dent. Sci. 11(44).
Piazza, G. C., Capello, P. A., Ferreira. R., Blatt, J. A., de Araújo. S. M., & Almeida, C. N. (2021). Avaliação do número de canais modelados com limas ProDesing M até sua fratura, simulado em blocos de resina acrílica. Revista Orbis Science. 1(1), 46-56.
Plotino, G., Grande, N. M., Testarelli, L., & Gambarini, G. (2012). Cyclic fatigue of Reciproc and WaveOne reciprocating instruments. International Endodontic Journal, 45(7), 614-618.
Sattapan, B., Nervo, G. J., Palamara, J. E., & Messer, H. H. (2000). Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use. Journal of endodontics, 26(3), 161-165.
Silva, M. R., de Carvalho, A. D. M., Rodrigues, M. A., Souza, C. C., Rosas, C. A. P., Cardoso, R. M., & da Silva Limoeiro, A. G. (2021). Estudo in vitro da limpeza de canais simulados (Wave One Gold X W-file). Research, Society and Development, 10(13), e541101321693-e541101321693.
Schilder, H. (1974). Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am, 18, 269-296.
Webber, J. (2015). Shaping canals with confidence: WaveOne GOLD single-file reciprocating system. Roots, 1(3), 34-40.
Yao, J. H., Schwartz, S. A., & Beeson, T. J. (2006). Cyclic fatigue of three types of rotary nickel-titanium files in a dynamic model. Journal of endodontics, 32(1), 55-57
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Giovanna Tavares Bonfim Souza; Adolfo de Matos de Carvalho; Marcely Reis da Silva; Matheus Almeida Rodrigues; Edeilton Santana de Oliveira Junior ; Caio Cesar Souza; Cesar Augusto Perine Rosas; Ryhan Menezes Cardoso; Ana Grasiela da Silva Limoeiro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
