Prevalence of MB2 canals in maxillary molars using different assessment methods: ex vivo analysis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i11.33323

Keywords:

Anatomy; Cone-beam computed tomography; Endodontics; Molar; Radiography.

Abstract

The anatomical complexity of the root canal system of the maxillary molars is considered a challenge to endodontic treatment. The aim of this study was to compare different diagnostic methods for identification of MB2: clinical examination (CE), dental operating microscope (DOM), digital periapical radiography (DR), cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and cross sections (CS). Sixty-one maxillary molars were randomly selected. Initially axial images were performed using CBCT. DR were made in ortho-positions, mesial positions and distal positions. The images were evaluated by an experienced examiner, the data were tabulated and not being revealed until the end of the experiment. After those openings and conventional coronary access was made, and the teeth evaluated by CE. Then the teeth were evaluated by DOM. The variable studied presents nominal and dichotomous nature ("absence of MB2 canal" and "presence of MB2 canal"). The agreement between the methods, when compared by pairs, was calculated by Cohen’s Kappa. A major percentual of MB2 detection was obtained by CBCT (67%), follow by CS (55%) and DOM (45%). The concordance between CS and CBCT was substantial (Kappa=0.76; 95%CI: 0.59 to 0.92); between CBCT and DOM was fair (Kappa=0.32; 95%CI: 0.09 to 0.56), as well as between DOM and CE. All the other concordance analysis showed slight agreement (Kappa from 0.00 to 0.20). The identification of MB2 can be facilitated using CBCT and DOM.

References

Abella, F., Teixidó, L. M., Patel, S., Sosa, F., Duran-Sindreu, F., & Roig, M. (2015). Cone-beam computed tomography analysis of the root canal morphology of maxillary first and second premolars in a Spanish population. Journal of Endodontics, 41(8), 1241-1247.

Acar, B., Kamburoğlu, K., Tatar, İ., Arıkan, V., Çelik, H. H., Yüksel, S., & Özen, T. (2015). Comparison of micro-computerized tomography and cone-beam computerized tomography in the detection of accessory canals in primary molars. Imaging science in dentistry, 45(4), 205-211.

Ahmad, I. A., & Al-Jadaa, A. (2014). Three root canals in the mesiobuccal root of maxillary molars: case reports and literature review. Journal of Endodontics, 40(12), 2087-2094.

Ahmed, H. M. A., Versiani, M. A., De‐Deus, G., & Dummer, P. M. H. (2017). A new system for classifying root and root canal morphology. International endodontic journal, 50(8), 761-770.

Baratto Filho, F., Zaitter, S., Haragushiku, G. A., de Campos, E. A., Abuabara, A., & Correr, G. M. (2009). Analysis of the internal anatomy of maxillary first molars by using different methods. Journal of endodontics, 35(3), 337-342.

Buhrley, L. J., Barrows, M. J., BeGole, E. A., & Wenckus, C. S. (2002). Effect of magnification on locating the MB2 canal in maxillary molars. Journal of endodontics, 28(4), 324-327.

Gupta, R., & Adhikari, H. D. (2017). Efficacy of cone beam computed tomography in the detection of MB2 canals in the mesiobuccal roots of maxillary first molars: An in vitro study. Journal of conservative dentistry: JCD, 20(5), 332.

Machado, B. S., Saguchi, A. H., Yamamoto, Ângela T. A., & Diniz, M. B. (2021). Use of computed tomography in endodontic diagnosis and planning of maxillary premolar with double radicular curvature. Research, Society and Development, 10(12), e488101220668. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i12.20668

Michelotto, A. L. da C., Cavenago, B. C., Oshiro, S. T. K., Yamamoto, Ângela T. A., & Batista, A. (2021). Radix Entomolaris in Mandibular First Molars: Report of 3 Cases. Research, Society and Development, 10(15), e219101522706.

Mirmohammadi, H., Mahdi, L., Partovi, P., Khademi, A., Shemesh, H., & Hassan, B. (2015). Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in the detection of a second mesiobuccal root canal in endodontically treated teeth: an ex vivo study. Journal of endodontics, 41(10), 1678-1681.

Olczak, K., & Pawlicka, H. (2017). The morphology of maxillary first and second molars analyzed by cone-beam computed tomography in a polish population. BMC medical imaging, 17(1), 1-7.

Ordinola‐Zapata, R., Bramante, C. M., Versiani, M. A., Moldauer, B. I., Topham, G., Gutmann, J. L., & Abella, F. (2017). Comparative accuracy of the Clearing Technique, CBCT and Micro‐CT methods in studying the mesial root canal configuration of mandibular first molars. International endodontic journal, 50(1), 90-96.

Pereira, K. F. S., Lima, G. dos S., Junqueira-Verardo, L. B., Rodrigues Filho, A., Bastos, H. J. S., Nascimento, V. R. do., & Tomazinho, L. F. (2021). Prevalence of untreated second canal in the mesiobuccal root of maxillary molars and its association with apical periodontitis: A cone beam computed tomography study. Research, Society and Development, 10(2), e55410212906

Ratanajirasut, R., Panichuttra, A., & Panmekiate, S. (2018). A cone-beam computed tomographic study of root and canal morphology of maxillary first and second permanent molars in a Thai population. Journal of Endodontics, 44(1), 56-61.

Seidberg, B. H., Altman, M., Guttuso, J., & Suson, M. (1973). Frequency of two mesiobuccal root canals in maxillary permanent first molars. The Journal of the American Dental Association, 87(4), 852-856.

Silva, R. de C. P., Bezerra, M. dos S., Gonzaga, G. L. P., Fonseca, A. B. M., Silva, M. K. A. da, Santos, I. de A., & Lessa, S. V. (2022). Clinical applications of cone beam computed tomography in endodontics: literature review. Research, Society and Development, 11(1), e21211124895.

Souza Júnior, Z. S. de, Araújo, F. M. L. C. de, & Lima, S. N. (2021). Use of cone beam computed tomography in the study of radicular morphology of maxillary premolars. Research, Society and Development, 10(7), e58510716950.

Studebaker, B., Hollender, L., Mancl, L., Johnson, J. D., & Paranjpe, A. (2018). The incidence of second mesiobuccal canals located in maxillary molars with the aid of cone-beam computed tomography. Journal of endodontics, 44(4), 565-570.

Tassoker, M., Magat, G., & Sener, S. (2018). A comparative study of cone-beam computed tomography and digital panoramic radiography for detecting pulp stones. Imaging science in Dentistry, 48(3), 201.

Torres, A., Jacobs, R., Lambrechts, P., Brizuela, C., Cabrera, C., Concha, G., & Pedemonte, M. E. (2015). Characterization of mandibular molar root and canal morphology using cone beam computed tomography and its variability in Belgian and Chilean population samples. Imaging science in dentistry, 45(2), 95-101.

Vasundhara, V., & Lashkari, K. P. (2017). An in vitro study to find the incidence of mesiobuccal 2 canal in permanent maxillary first molars using three different methods. Journal of conservative dentistry: JCD, 20(3), 190.

Weine, F. S., Healey, H. J., Gerstein, H., & Evanson, L. (1969). Canal configuration in the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary first molar and its endodontic significance. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, 28(3), 419-425.

Wolf, T. G., Paqué, F., Woop, A. C., Willershausen, B., & Briseño-Marroquín, B. (2017). Root canal morphology and configuration of 123 maxillary second molars by means of micro-CT. International journal of oral science, 9(1), 33-37.

Wu, D., Zhang, G., Liang, R., Zhou, G., Wu, Y., Sun, C., & Fan, W. (2017). Root and canal morphology of maxillary second molars by cone-beam computed tomography in a native Chinese population. Journal of International Medical Research, 45(2), 830-842.

Zand, V., Mokhtari, H., Zonouzi, H. R., & Shojaei, S. N. (2017). Root Canal Morphologies of Mesiobuccal Roots of Maxillary Molars using Cone beam Computed Tomography and Periapical Radiographic Techniques in an Iranian Population. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, 18(9), 745-749.

Downloads

Published

18/08/2022

How to Cite

SANTOS, P. A. X. de O.; TONELLI, S. Q. .; MANZI, F. R.; HORTA, M. C. R.; NUNES, E.; SILVEIRA, F. F. . Prevalence of MB2 canals in maxillary molars using different assessment methods: ex vivo analysis. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 11, n. 11, p. e147111133323, 2022. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v11i11.33323. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/33323. Acesso em: 16 apr. 2024.

Issue

Section

Health Sciences