Management technology, network activism and technopolitics: a narrative
Keywords:Networks; Management Technology; Activism; Immaterial Work.
Network actions takes place within processes in which management technology is configured to a new work-value, immaterial, that makes indistinguishable in practice previously clearly separable fields such as leisure-work, activism-business or academic-practitioners, among others. The objective of this article is to present a narrative of the construction of a technopolitical network that acted in the relations between technologies, culture and science in Brazil. The methodological approach draws on the social construction of technology - SCOT, participant observation and manipulation of linguistic corpus. As a result the narrative characterizes the groups involved in the process, their interpretations and a structure of meanings that makes sense of the network. The conclusion proposes reflections on the conditions of possibility of life in front of the ubiquity of the management technology practically invisible and not perceived by the network actors.
Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (1987). Membership roles in field research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Ahmed, H., Qureshi, O. M., & Khan, A. A. (2015). Reviving a ghost in the history of technology: The social construction of the recumbent bicycle. Social Studies of Science, 45(1), 130–136.
Appley, D. G., & Winder, A. E. (1977). An evolving definition of collaboration and some implications for the world of work. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 13(3), 279–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/002188637701300304
Bijker, W. E. (1987). The social construction of Bakelite: Toward a theory of invention. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hugues, & T. F. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology (pp. 159–187). Massachusets: The MIT press.
Bijker, W. E. (1995). Of bicycles, bakelites, and bulbs: towards a theory of sociotechnical change. Cambridge: The MIT press.
Bijker, W. E. (2009). Social construction of technology. In J. K. B. Olsen, S. A. Pedersen, & V. F. Hendricks (Eds.), A companion to the philosophy of technology (pp. 88–94). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwel.
Bijker, W. E., Hugues, T. P., & Pinch, T. (1987). The social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology. Massachusets: The MIT Press.
Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, È. C. (2009). O novo espírito do capitalismo. São Paulo: Martins Fontes.
Byker, E. J. (2014). Bangalore’s Challenge: The Social Construction of Educational Technology in India’s Silicon Valley. Global Studies Journal, 6(2).
Callon, M. (1984). Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. The Sociological Review, 32(S1), 196–233.
Cleaver, H. (2005). The Zapatista Effect: The Internet and the rise of an alternative political fabric. Retrieved December 11, 2012, from https://libcom.org/library/zapatista-effect-cleaver
Dagnino, R., Brandão, F. C., & Novaes, H. T. (2004). Sobre o marco analítico conceitual da tecnologia social. In A. de Paulo, C. J. Mello, L. P. Nascimento Filho, & T. Koracakis (Eds.), Tecnologia social – uma estratégia para o desenvolvimento (pp. 15–64). Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Banco do Brasil.
Diniz, A. da S. (2004). A maldição do trabalho. João Pessoa: Manufatura.
Evangelista, R. (2014). O movimento software livre do Brasil: política, trabalho e hacking. Horizontes Antropológicos, (41), 173–200.
Hardt, M. (2002). Globalization and democracy: politics of multitude. Retrieved November 10, 2012, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1unYWrec62U. Acesso em: 15. jan. 2014.
Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2001). Império. São Paulo: Record.
Harvey, D. (1992). Condição pós-moderna: uma pesquisa sobre as origens da mudança cultural. São Paulo: Edições Loyola.
Hecht, G. (2001). Technology, politics, and national identity in France. In M. Allen & G. Hecht (Eds.), Technologies of Power: Essays in Honor of Thomas Parke Hughes and Agatha Chipley Hughes (pp. 255–293). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Himanen, P. (2001). The Hacker Ethic and the Spirit of The Information Age. New York: Random House.
Hine, C. (2000). Virtual Ethnography. London: Sage.
Klein, H. K., & Kleinman, D. L. (2002). The social construction of technology: Structural considerations. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 27(1), 28–52.
Latour, B. (2000). Ciência em ação: como seguir cientistas e engenheiros sociedade afora. São Paulo: UNESP.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. New York: Oxford university press.
Machado, J. A. S. (2007). Ativismo em rede e conexões identitárias: novas perspectivas para os movimentos sociais. Sociologias, 9(18), 248–285. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.br/pdf/soc/n18/n18a12
Mello, S. C. B. de, & Sá, M. G. de. (2006). Tecendo uma virtuosa “colcha de retalhos”: a constituição e interpretação de um corpus lingüístico num estudo sobre reflexividade e articulação empreendedora. Revista de Administração Pública, 40(3), 385–410. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.br/pdf/%0D/rap/v40n3/31248.pdf
Motta, F. C. P., & Bresser-Pereira, L. C. (2004). Introdução à organização burocrática (2nd ed.). São Paulo: Thomsom.
Motta, F. C. P., & Vasconcelos, I. F. G. (2006). Teoria geral da administração (3rd ed.). São Paulo: Thomson.
Negri, A., & Revel, J. (2014). Conversações com Antonio Negri e Judith Revel. Retrieved January 5, 2014, from http://vimeo.com/68185967
Pinch, T., Ashmore, M., & Mulkay, M. (1992). Technology, testing, text: clinical budgeting in the U. K. National Health Service. In W. E. Bjiker & J. Law (Eds.), Building technology / Shaping society: studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 265–289). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Rossell, D. (2014). Demolition d’un mur: The social construction of technology and early cinema projection systems. Early Popular Visual Culture, 12(3), 304–341.
Rubim, A. A. C., & Rubim, I. O. (2017). Políticas para culturas digitais no Brasil. Políticas Culturais Em Revista, 10(1), 213–236.
Scherer-Warren, I. (2006). Das mobilizações às redes de movimentos sociais. Sociedade E Estado, 21(1), 109–130. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.br/pdf/se/v21n1/v21n1a07
Scott, J. (2000). Social network analysis: a handbook (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Shin, D. (2014). A socio-technical framework for Internet-of-Things design: A human-centered design for the Internet of Things. Telematics and Informatics, 31(4), 519–531.
Souza, F. N. de, Costa, A. P., Moreira, A., & Souza, D. N. de. (2014). WebQDA - Software de Apoio à Análise Qualitativa: Manual do utilizador. Aveiro: Universidade de Aveiro.
Trist, E. (1977). Collaboration in work settings: a personal perspective. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 13(3), 268–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/002188637701300303
Trist, E. (1981). The evolution of socio-technical systems. Occasional paper 2 . Retrieved November 20, 2012, from http://www.sociotech.net/wiki/images/9/94/Evolution_of_socio_technical_systems.pdf
Trist, E. (1983). Referent organizations and the development of inter-organizational domains. Human Relations, 36(3), 269–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678303600304
Ugarte, D. de. (2008). O poder das redes: manual ilustrado para pessoas, organizações e empresas, chamadas a praticar o ciberativismo. Porto Alegre: EDIPUCRS.
Wark, M. (2004). A Hacker Manifesto. Cambridge: Harvard Universty Press.
Wilf, E. (2016). NIMBY? Understanding Post-Fordist Business Innovation through One of Its Key Semiotic Technologies. Current Anthropology, 57(6), 732–760.
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.