Use of alcoholic preparation in surgical hand antisepsis: an integrative review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i11.33631Keywords:
Antisepsis techniques and execution time; Antimicrobial efficacy; Economic and ecological advantage; Reduction of infections of the surgical site.Abstract
Objective: To compare the immediate antimicrobial efficacy and residual effect of alcoholic preparations in relation to traditional products for surgical hand antisepsis, evidenced by the scientific literature. Methods: This is an integrative literature review, carried out from September 2020 to January 2021. The study selection strategy was to search for publications indexed in MEDLINE, UPTODATE, LILACS, SCIELO. The following inclusion criteria were adopted: articles published in Portuguese, English and Spanish, between the years 2010 to 2020 and that aproached the theme of the study. Thesis, dissertations and duplicate articles were excluded. Based on these criteria, 7 scientific materials were found. Results: Alcoholic preparations have a shorter application / contact time compared to traditional products, due to their quick antimicrobial effect and longer lasting residual effect, which optimizes the time of professionals and hospital resources. The disadvantages are related to the dryness effect, burning sensation in hands and their volatile nature, which can be controlled through use of emollients or other conditions, in addition to special attention to the control of the volatile nature. The use of AP eliminates time spent when compared to brushing with chlorhexidine and represents a lower cost in terms of water use, also generating a reduction in ecological impacts regarding the use and disposal of brush residues and a reduction in water consumption. Conclusion: the alcoholic antiseptic solution brings more benefits in its use when compared to traditional techniques and its adherence in health institutions in Brazil should be stimulated considering the cost-benefit compared to the brushing technique, being essential the involvement of managers and assistance teams for changing practice.
References
Brasil. (2007). Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Higienização das Mãos em Serviços de Saúde. Brasília.
Brasil. (2018). Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Nota técnica n°01/2018 GVIMS/GGTES/ANVISA: Orientações gerais para higiene das mãos em serviços de saúde. Brasília.
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. (2017). Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Medidas de Prevenção de Infecção Relacionada à Assistência à Saúde. Brasília.
Graf, M. E., Machado, A., Mensor, L.L., Zampiere, D., Campos, R., & Faham, L. (2014). Antissepsia cirúrgica das mãos com preparações alcoólicas: custo-efetividade, adesão de profissionais e benefícios ecológicos no cenário de saúde. Jornal Brasileiro de Economia da Saúde, 6 (2), 71-80.
Gonçalves, K. J., Graziano, K. U., & Kawagoe, J. Y. (2012). Revisão sistemática sobre antissepsia cirúrgica das mãos com preparação alcoólica em comparação aos produtos tradicionais. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, 46 (6), 1484-1493.
Kawagoe, J. Y. (2016). Tendências e desafios do preparo cirúrgico das mãos. Revista SOBECC, 21 (4), 217-222.
Menezes, R. M., Cardoso, V., Hoehr, C. F., Bulle, D., Burgos, M. S., Benitez, L. B., & Renner, J. D. P. (2016). Avaliação microbiológica da antissepsia pré-operatória das mãos de profissionais de enfermagem de um centro cirúrgico. Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção, 1 (1), 178-191.
Peixoto, J. G. P., Branco, A., Dias, C. A. G., Millão, L. F., & Caregnato, R. C. A. (2020). Antissepsia cirúrgica das mãos com preparação alcoólica: redução microbiana em diferentes tempos de uso no centro cirúrgico. Revista SOBECC, 25 (2), 83-89.
Prates, J., Monteiro, A. B., Lopes, F., Stumpfs, D., Guglielmi, G., Narvaez, G., Bobsin, R. C., & Caregnato, R. C. A. (2016). Implantação de antissepsia cirúrgica alcoólica das mãos: relato de experiência. Revista SOBECC, 21(2), 116-121.
Price, L., Melone, L., McLarnon, N., Bunyan, D., Kilpatrick, C., Flores, P., & Reilly, J. (2018). A Systematic Review to evaluate the evidence base for the World Health Organization's adopted Hand Hygiene Technique for reducing the microbial load on the hands of healthcare workers. American Journal of Infection Control, 46 (7), 814-23.
Santos, L. N. R., Moniz, N. J., & Freitas, R. R. (2010). Higienização e antissepsia das mãos para cirurgia. Arquivos Médicos dos Hospitais e da Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo, 55 (2), 82-87.
Souza, M. T., Silva, M. D., & Carvalho, R. (2010). Revisão integrativa: o que é e como fazer. Einstein (São Paulo), 8 (1), 102-106.
Suchomel, M., & Rotter, M. (2011). Ethanol in pre-surgical hand hubs: concentration and duration of application for achieving European Norm EN 12791. Journal of Hospital Infection, 77 (3), 263-266.
Tanner, J., Dumville, J. C., & Fotnam, M. (2016). Surgical hand antisepsis to reduce surgical site infection. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2016 (1), CD004288.
World Health Organization. (2009). WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care. First Global Patient Safety Challenge. Clean Care is Safer Care WHO Press, Genebra.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Cyane Fabiele Silva Pinto; Juliana de Menezes Dantas; Telma Vieira Lima ; Thallyta Maria Tavares Antunes; Sara Machado Miranda Leal Barbosa; Larissa Nunes de Alencar; Izane Luiza Xavier Carvalho Andrade ; Lucas Manoel Oliveira Costa; José Paulo Rosal Arnaldo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.