Peer and self-evaluation using active teaching method
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i7.3495Keywords:
Self-assessment; Peer assessment; Active teaching method; Lectures.Abstract
Nowadays, new methodologies have been used to complementing and assisting in the fixation of knowledge. So, the aim of this work was apply a active education methods using a study case methodology to assess the critical competence in objective and subjective assessments and self-assessment, and to analyze the results obtained in a qualitative way. Students developed content, presented seminars, evaluate their peers objectively (assigning grades) and subjective (selecting according to preference) and also performed the self-assessment. Based on the grades attributed by the students, the ability to evaluate by peers by comparing variances was evaluated. From the results obtained, we can conclude that there is a mutual influence on the two types of evaluations used in this research. Students were able to evaluate their peers and also self-evaluation. There is consistency between different evaluators and also when compared to self-criticism. From the research on the experience of active teaching, it is possible to observe the growing preference of students for this teaching methodology.
References
Behrens, M. A., & Thomé Oliari, A. L. (2017). a Evolução Dos Paradigmas Na Educação: Do Pensamento Científico Tradicional À Complexidade. Revista Diálogo Educacional, 7(22), 53.
Bishop, J., & Verleger, M. (2013). Testing the flipped classroom with model-eliciting activities and video lectures in a mid-level undergraduate engineering course. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 161–163.
Botomé, S. P. (2011). Avaliação entre pares na ciência e na academia: aspectos clandestinos de um julgamento nem sempre científico, acadêmico ou de avaliação. Psicologia USP, 22(2), 335–356.
Capellato, P., Ribeiro, L. M. S., & Sachs, D. (2019). Active Methodologies in the Teaching-Learning Process Using Seminars as Educational Tools in the General Chemistry Curricular Component. Research, Society and Development, 8(8), 1–20.
Costa, N. M. da S. C. (2007). Docência no ensino médico: por que é tão difícil mudar? Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica, 31(1), 21–30.
Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). Studies in Higher Education The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Online) Journal Homepage, 1470–174.
Domingues, R. C. L., Amaral, E., & Zeferino, A. M. B. (2007). Autoavaliação e Avaliação por Pares – Estratégias para o Desenvolvimento Profissional do Médico Self and Peer Assessment – Strategies for the Professional Development of the Physician. 31(2), 173–175.
Fava De Oliveira, V., Tozzi, M. J., Loder, L. L., Mattasoglio, O., Carlos, N., Moreira, A., Istefani, S., De, C., Jose, P., & Baessogrimoni, A. (2014). Desafios da educação em engenharia: Formação em Engenharia, Capacitação Docente,Experiências Metodológicas e Proposições organizadores (Editora Forma Diagramação (ed.); 1st ed.). ABENGE.
Gaspar, A. (2012). A educação formal e a educação informal em ciências. In A. Vicente & S. Martins (Eds.), Ciência e público: caminhos da divulgação científica no Brasil (pp. 171–183). Editora UFRJ.
Hanrahan, S. J., & Isaacs, G. (2001). Assessing self- and peer-assessment: The students’ views. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 21(1), 53–70.
Leal Filho, W., Shiel, C., & Paço, A. (2016). Implementing and operationalising integrative approaches to sustainability in higher education: the role of project-oriented learning. Journal of Cleaner Production, 133, 126–135.
Lytle, S., & Cochran-Smith, M. (1992). Teacher Research as a Way of Knowing. Harvard Educational Review, 62(4), 447–475.
Mansano, S. R. V. (2009). Sujeito, subjetividade e modos de subjetivação na contemporaneidade. Revista de Psicologia Da UNESP, 8(2), 110–117.
Mazur, E., & Hilborn, R. C. (1997). Peer instruction: A user’s manual. Physics Today, 50(4), 65.
Mok, M. M. C., Lung, C. L., Cheng, D. P. W., Cheung, R. H. P., & Ng, M. L. (2006). Self-assessment in higher education: Experience in using a metacognitive approach in five case studies. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 415–433.
Monteiro, V., & Fragoso, R. (2005). Avaliação entre pares. VIII Congresso Galaicoportuguês de Psicopedagogia.
Moreira, M. A. (1993). Sobre o ensino do método científico. Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física, 10(2), 108–117.
Oliveira, I. M. D. A., & Dias, C. M. S. B. (2001). Família pós-moderna, construção de subjetividade e escolha profissional. Nais Do IV Simpósio Brasileiro de Orientação Vocacional e Ocupacional; I Encontro de Orientadores Profissionais Do Mercosul.
Pacheco, J. A. (2002). Critérios de Avaliação na Escola. In Avaliação das aprendizagens: das concepções às práticas (pp. 53–64). Departamento da Educação Básica.
Pereira, A.S. et al. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. [e-book]. Santa Maria. Ed. UAB/NTE/UFSM. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/handle/1/15824/Lic_ Computacao_Metodologia-Pesquisa-Cientifica.pdf?sequence=1. Acesso em: 21 Abril 2020.
Pinto, A. S. dA S., Bueno, Ma. rodrigueS P., do Amaral e Silva, Ma. Apa. F., Sellmann, M. Zamp., & Koehler, S. Ma. F. (2012). Vista do Inovação Didática - Projeto de Reflexão e Aplicação de Metodologias Ativas de Aprendizagem no Ensino Superior: Uma Experiência com “Peer Instruction.” Janus, 9(11), 75–87.
Pinto, J. M. B. (2002). A avaliação formal no 1o ciclo do ensino básico: Uma construção social.
Prado, M. L., Velho, M. B., Espíndola, D. S., Sobrinho, S. H., & Backes, V. M. S. (2012). Arco de charles maguerez: refletindo estratégias de metodologia ativa na formação de profissionais de saúde. Esc Anna Nery, 16(1), 172–177.
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231.
Rosso, A. J., & Taglieber, J. E. (1992). Métodos ativos e atividades de ensino. Perspectiva, 10(17), 37–46.
Santos, L. (2002). Autoavaliação regulada: porquê, o quê e como? Avaliação Das Aprendizagens. Das Concepções Às Práticas, 75–84.
Santos Felício, H. M., & Possani, L. de F. P. (2013). Análise crítica de currículo: um olhar sobre a prática pedagógica. Currículo Sem Fronteiras, 13(1), 129–142.
Schmidt, M. L. S. (2011). Avaliação acadêmica, ideologia e poder. Psicologia USP, 22(2), 315–334.
Taylor, P. (1992). Improving Graduate Student Seminar Presentations through Training. Teaching of Psychology, 19(4), 236–238.
Tucker, B. (2012). The flipped classroom. Education Next, 12(1), 82–83.
Valente, J. A. (2013). Aprendizagem Ativa no Ensino Superior: a proposta da sala de aula invertida. Depto. de Multimeios, Nied e GGTE-Unicamp & Ced–PucSP.
van der Vleuten, C. P. M., & Schuwirth, L. W. T. (2005). Assessing professional competence: from methods to programmes. Medical Education, 39(3), 309–317.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
