Energization of irrigation solution as a supplement in the cleaning and disinfection of the root channel system

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i13.35745

Keywords:

Endodontics; Disinfection; Root canal therapy.

Abstract

Endodontic treatment aims to control the microbial factor to ensure the maintenance of teeth in the oral cavity in the face of the diagnosis of a diseased condition. An unfavorable factor is the anatomical complexity of the root canal system, due to the presence of apical ramifications, accessory canals and isthmus, making it difficult to completely remove organic and inorganic remnants in these areas of difficult access during instrumentation. Seeking to improve this, during endodontic treatment, one of the tools used to combat microorganisms is the irrigating solution. Still, the use of these solutions is not sufficient to remove mineral material when used individually. Thus, the help of other agents and techniques is necessary for the best result. Passive ultrasonic irrigation is based on the principle that the passive insertion of a metallic tip/file attached to an ultrasonic device in a root canal filled with an irrigating or chelating solution, when activated, allows increasing the performance of the solution agitation and improving the removal of debris, smear layer and root canal filling materials. This work aimed to carry out a narrative review of the literature addressing the effectiveness of energizing the irrigating solution after the biomechanical process of the root canal system in different protocols. In general, the works presented in this literature review showed that the methods with agitation of the irrigating solution promoted better cleaning of the canal, the isthmus and removal of the smear layer in relation to the conventional method.

References

Vianna, T. C., Lima, A. W., da Costa Silveira, A., & de Araújo, P. X. (2022). Uso de irrigação sob pressão negativa durante o preparo químico-cirúrgico dos sistemas de canais radiculares–revisão sistemática. Research, Society and Development, 11(8), e5111824114-e5111824114.

Gade, V. J., Sedani, S., Asani, R., & Kusumbe, R. Comparative Clinical Evaluation of Conventional Syringe Irrigation, Endoactivator and Endovac in Reducing the Microbial Count From Infected Root Canal: an in Vivo Study. International Journal of Health Sciences, (III), 1664-1672.

Caron, G., Nham, K., Bronnec, F., & Machtou, P. (2010). Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals. Journal of endodontics, 36(8), 1361-1366.

Duque, J. A., Duarte, M. A. H., Canali, L. C. F., Zancan, R. F., Vivan, R. R., Bernardes, R. A., & Bramante, C. M. (2017). Comparative effectiveness of new mechanical irrigant agitating devices for debris removal from the canal and isthmus of mesial roots of mandibular molars. Journal of endodontics, 43(2), 326-331.

Sahar-Helft, S., Sarp, A. S. K., Stabholtz, A., Gutkin, V., Redenski, I., & Steinberg, D. (2015). Comparison of positive-pressure, passive ultrasonic, and laser-activated irrigations on smear-layer removal from the root canal surface. Photomedicine and laser surgery, 33(3), 129-135.

Almeida, H. S. (2019). Sistemas de irrigação: revisão comparativa. Revista Farol, 8(8), 363-383.

Park, E., Shen, Y., Khakpour, M., & Haapasalo, M. (2013). Apical pressure and extent of irrigant flow beyond the needle tip during positive-pressure irrigation in an in vitro root canal model. Journal of endodontics, 39(4), 511-515.

Peeters, H. H., & Mooduto, L. (2013). Radiographic examination of apical extrusion of root canal irrigants during cavitation induced by Er, Cr: YSGG laser irradiation: an in vivo study. Clinical oral investigations, 17(9), 2105-2112.

Chávez-Andrade, G. M., Guerreiro-Tanomaru, J. M., Miano, L. M., Leonardo, R. D. T., & Tanomaru-Filho, M. (2014). Radiographic evaluation of root canal cleaning, main and laterals, using different methods of final irrigation. Revista de Odontologia da UNESP, 43, 333-337.

Weller, R. N., Brady, J. M., & Bernier, W. E. (1980). Efficacy of ultrasonic cleaning. Journal of endodontics, 6(9), 740-743.

Cordeiro, A. M., Oliveira, G. M. D., Rentería, J. M., & Guimarães, C. A. (2007). Revisão sistemática: uma revisão narrativa. Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões, 34, 428-431.

Baumeier, N. C., Duarte, M. A. H., Vivan, R. R., Lemos, A. C., Machado, R., & da Silva Neto, U. X. (2022). Passive ultrasonic irrigation, EndoActivator system and XP-endo Finisher R as additional cleaning techniques to remove residual filling materials from flattened root canals. Journal of Conservative Dentistry, 25(4), 385.

Shahravan, A., Haghdoost, A. A., Adl, A., Rahimi, H., & Shadifar, F. (2007). Effect of smear layer on sealing ability of canal obturation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of endodontics, 33(2), 96-105.

Ordinola‐Zapata, R., Bramante, C. M., Aprecio, R. M., Handysides, R., & Jaramillo, D. E. (2014). Biofilm removal by 6% sodium hypochlorite activated by different irrigation techniques. International endodontic journal, 47(7), 659-666.

Mancini, M., Cerroni, L., Iorio, L., Armellin, E., Conte, G., & Cianconi, L. (2013). Smear layer removal and canal cleanliness using different irrigation systems (EndoActivator, EndoVac, and passive ultrasonic irrigation): field emission scanning electron microscopic evaluation in an in vitro study. Journal of endodontics, 39(11), 1456-1460.

Elnaghy, A. M., Mandorah, A., & Elsaka, S. E. (2017). Effectiveness of XP-endo Finisher, EndoActivator, and File agitation on debris and smear layer removal in curved root canals: a comparative study. Odontology, 105(2), 178-183.

Kato, A. S., Cunha, R. S., da Silveira Bueno, C. E., Pelegrine, R. A., Fontana, C. E., & de Martin, A. S. (2016). Investigation of the efficacy of passive ultrasonic irrigation versus irrigation with reciprocating activation: an environmental scanning electron microscopic study. Journal of endodontics, 42(4), 659-663.

Faria, G., Viola, K. S., Coaguila‐Llerena, H., Oliveira, L. R. A., Leonardo, R. T., Aranda‐García, A. J., & Guerreiro‐Tanomaru, J. M. (2019). Penetration of sodium hypochlorite into root canal dentine: effect of surfactants, gel form and passive ultrasonic irrigation. International Endodontic Journal, 52(3), 385-392.

Alakshar, A., Saleh, A. R. M., & Gorduysus, M. O. (2020). Debris and smear layer removal from oval root canals comparing XP-Endo Finisher, EndoActivator, and manual irrigation: A SEM evaluation. European Journal of Dentistry, 14(04), 626-633.

Azimian, S., Bakhtiar, H., Azimi, S., & Esnaashari, E. (2019). In vitro effect of XP-Endo finisher on the amount of residual debris and smear layer on the root canal walls. Dental research journal, 16(3), 179.

Briano, A. X. D. L. C.T, de Melo Júnior, P. M. R., Travassos, R. M. C., & da Paz, E. S. L. (2021). Instrumentação com XP-Finisher como potencializador da desinfecção do sistema de canais radiculares–revisão integrativa. Research, Society and Development, 10(13), e152101320474-e152101320474.

Zand, V., Mokhtari, H., Reyhani, M. F., Nahavandizadeh, N., & Azimi, S. (2017). Smear layer removal evaluation of different protocol of Bio Race file and XP-endo Finisher file in corporation with EDTA 17% and NaOCl. Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 9(11), e1310.

Oliveira, M. F., de Oliveira, Y. B. S. T., Magalhães, M. M., Magalhães, M. L. P., de Vasconcelos, B. C., & Viana, F. L. P. (2022). Tratamento endodôntico de pré-molares com três canais radiculares: série de casos clínicos. Research, Society and Development, 11(3), e25311326590-e25311326590.

Published

09/10/2022

How to Cite

MARTINEZ, A. L.; KARWELL, J. C.; ARAÚJO, C. de S. A. .; BRUNINI, S. H. S.; TOMAZINHO, L. F. Energization of irrigation solution as a supplement in the cleaning and disinfection of the root channel system. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 11, n. 13, p. e375111335745, 2022. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v11i13.35745. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/35745. Acesso em: 18 apr. 2024.

Issue

Section

Health Sciences