Active and Participative Methodologies: an analysis of UNIFACIG’s production in STHEM-BRASIL Forum

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i7.3648

Keywords:

Meaningful learning; Students; Bloom taxonomy.

Abstract

The central theme of the article is the different learning participative methodologies, based on Bloom Revised Taxonomy, applied in many courses at the UNIFACIG University Center. The justification for the use of Taxonomy theoretical support focuses on the point of reflective, critical and creative development of students. The objective of the study is to present a systematic revision of papers published concerning to active methodologies developed at UNIFACIG, seeking out to verify the contribution of thematic development of a critical, reflective and collaborative professional and the ability to apply the learned content and also the state of the art in which the theme is applied as a didactic strategy in different courses. As a methodological design, it was opted a systematic review of studies published in different Forums conducted by Sthem-Brasil Consortium totaling 21 works. In view of analyses carried out in the various works of the institution, it is clear that application of active methodologies in teaching and learning process are preponderant aspects of a better content development. Whether using simulated practices or real experiences; communication, interaction between participants, restlessness and involvement are intrinsic parts of the process, which leads to more meaningful and lasting learning. It is noticed that the desired result was achieved, because, in general, studies show extremely positive results: a more critical, reflective and instigating university education, with more collaborative and creative students and, specially, with social and responsible conscience.

References

Althaus, MTM, Bagio, VA.(2007). As metodologias ativas e as aproximações entre o ensino e a aprendizagem na prática pedagógica universitária. Revista Docência Do Ensino Superior, 7(2):79-96. Disponível em: <https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/rdes/article/view/2342>

Bastos, C.C. (2006). Metodologias Ativas. (2006). Disponível em: http://educacaoemedicina.blogspot.com.br/2006/02/metodologias-ativas.html>.

Berbel, NAN. (2011). As metodologias ativas e a promoção da autonomia de estudantes. Semina: Ciências Sociais e Humanas, 32(1): 25-40. Disponível em: <http://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/seminasoc/article/view/10326.

Bereton et al. (2007). Lessons from Applying the Sistematic Literature Review Process within the Software Engineering Domain. The Journal of System and Software, 80, p.571-583.

Biolchini, JCA et al. (2007). Scientific research ontology to support systematic review in software engineering. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 21(2): 133-151.

Borges, TS & Alencar, G. (2014). Metodologias ativas na promoção da formação crítica do estudante: o uso das metodologias ativas como recurso didático na formação crítica do estudante do ensino superior. Cairu em Revista, 3(4): 119-143.

Conforto, EC, Amaral, DC & Silva, SL. (2011). Roteiro para revisão bibliográfica sistemática: aplicação no desenvolvimento de produtos e gerenciamento de projetos. Trabalho apresentado, n. 8. Disponível em: <http://vision.ime.usp.br/~acmt/conforto.pdf>.

Cook, DJ, Mulrow, CD & Haynes, RB. (1997). Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Annals of Internal Medicine, 126(5): 376-380.

Levy, Y & Ellis, TJ. (2006). A system approach to conduct an effective literature review in support of information systems research. Informing Science Journal, 9(1): 181-212

Masseto, MT. (2003). Competência pedagógica do professor universitário. SPaulo: Summus.

Mitre, SMI, Siqueira-Batista, R, Girardide, JM, Pinto, NM, Meirelles, CAB, Pinto-Porto, C, Moreira, T & Hoffmann, LMA. (2008). Metodologias ativas de ensino-aprendizagem na formação profissional em saúde: debates atuais. Ciências e Saúde Coletiva, Rio de Janeiro, v. 13. Disponível em: http://www.redalyc.org/redalyc/pdf/630/63009618.pdf.

Pereira, AS, Shitsuka, DM, Parreira, FJ & Shitsuka, R. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. [e-book]. Santa Maria. Ed. UAB/NTE/UFSM. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/handle/1/15824/Lic_Computacao_Metodologia-Pesquisa-Cientifica.pdf?sequence=1.

Piaget, J & Braga, I. (1973). Para onde vai a educação? São Paulo: J. Olympio.

Published

20/05/2020

How to Cite

VENTURA, R. de C. M. O.; SOUZA, R. A. de; MENDES, A. A.; ALTINO FILHO, H. V.; TRINDADE, F. C.; ARAUJO, G. L.; PÔNCIO, T. G. H. de O. Active and Participative Methodologies: an analysis of UNIFACIG’s production in STHEM-BRASIL Forum. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 9, n. 7, p. e425973648, 2020. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v9i7.3648. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3648. Acesso em: 26 apr. 2024.

Issue

Section

Education Sciences