The exclusion of the unworthy heir and the bureaucratization imposed by the brazilian legal order
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i15.36751Keywords:
Succession law; Exclusion of succession for indignity; Declaratory action of indignity; Bill No. 7,806/10.Abstract
The Civil Code governs several acts of Brazilians, including contracts of various kinds, liability and the way in which an heir receives the inheritance, which is called inheritance law. The present work deals with the inheritance law that has as its object the transfer of the patrimony of a deceased person to his heirs and focuses on the bureaucracy imposed by the Brazilian legal system for the exclusion of the unworthy heir of the succession. The choice of theme was due to the observance of affront to constitutional principles and characteristics such as solidarity and family trust by the imposition of Declaratory Action of Indignity in cases of indignity already confirmed in the criminal sphere. As a result of this scenario, the following problem arose: What are the possible legal consequences with the inclusion of article 1815-A by the bill 7.806/10 in the civil code in relation to the exclusion of the heir for indignity? In order to do so, the above PL was analyzed, as well as its motivations evidenced by its author (former senator Serys Slhessarenko) and compared with the current reality of exclusion for indignity after conviction in the criminal field, in addition, doctrinal positions were highlighted for being related to the scenario that seeks the PL. The conclusion was that the approval of bill 7,806/10 would enshrine the effectiveness of constitutional provisions, as well as being of relevance for the protection of important bases of the family institute and would rule out the succession of a merely patrimonial nature, its approval being essential. Finally, the methodology was carried out through analytical research carried out in doctrines, legislation and scientific articles.
References
Brasil. (2010). Câmara dos Deputados. Projeto de Lei Complementar nº 7.806 de 2010. Acrescenta art. 1.815-A à Lei nº 10.406, de 10 de janeiro de 2002 (Código Civil), para determinar, nos casos de indignidade, que o trânsito em julgado da sentença penal condenatória acarretará a exclusão imediata do herdeiro ou legatário indigno. https://www.camara.leg.br/proposicoesWeb/fichadetramitacao?idProposicao=485256.
Brasil. (2002). Lei nº 10.406, de 10 de janeiro de 2002. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/2002/l10406compilada.htm.
Chemin, B. F. (2015). Manual da Univates para trabalhos acadêmicos: planejamento, elaboração e apresentação. (3a ed.), Ed. da Univates.
Brasil. (2010). Congresso Nacional. Câmara dos Deputados. Diário da Câmara dos Deputados. Brasília.
Carvalho, L. P. (2019). Direito das Sucessões. (4a ed.), Atlas.
Brasil. (1988). Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil: promulgada em 5 de outubro de 1988.http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicao.htm.
Giacomelli, C. L. F. (2021). Direito Civil: direito das sucessões. Porto Alegre: SAGAH.
Gil, A. C. (1991). Como elaborar projeto de pesquisa. (3a ed.), Atlas.
Gonçalves, C. R. (2013). Direito Civil Brasileiro. Edição 7: direito das sucessões. Editora Saraiva.
Gonçalves, C. R. (2021). Direito civil brasileiro. volume 7: direito das sucessões. (15a ed.), Saraiva Educação.
Maluf, C. A. D. Adriana, C. D. (2021). Curso de direito das sucessões. (3a ed.), Saraiva Educação.
Brasil. (2019). Minas Gerais. Tribunal de Justiça de Minas Gerais, Apelação Cível nº 1.0358.16.002170-7/001. Minas Gerais.
Moraes, A. (2002) de. Direito constitucional. (11a ed.), Atlas.
Nader, P. (2016). Curso de direito civil, v. 6: direito das sucessões. (7a ed.), Forense.
Nicolau, G. R. (2005). Direito Civil. Sucessões. Série Leituras Jurídicas. Provas e Concursos.
Pereira, C. M.S. (2020). Instituições de direito civil: direito das sucessões.vol. VI; revista e atualizada por Carlos Roberto Barbosa Moreira. (27a ed.), Forense.
Brasil. (2012). Rio Grande do Sul. Tribunal de Justiça do Rio Grande do Sul. Agravo de Instrumento nº 70051505394. Rio Grande do Sul.
Brasil. (2013). Rio Grande do Sul. Tribunal de Justiça do Rio Grande do Sul. Agravo de Instrumento n.º70054350079. Rio Grande do Sul, 04 de Julho de 2013.https://www.tjrs.jus.br/novo/busca/?tipoConsulta=por_processo&return=proc&client=wp_index&combo_comarca=700&comarca=&numero_processo=70073625667&numero_processo_desktop=70073625667&CNJ=N&comarca=&nome_comarca=&uf_OAB=&OAB=&comarca=&nome_comarca=&nome_parte=.
Rodrigues, S. (2003). Direito Civil. vol. 1: Parte Geral. (34a ed.),
Venosa, S. S. (2017). Direito civil: sucessões. (18a ed.), Atlas.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Emilly Rodrigues de Abreu; Thallyne Alves Pereira; Nelly Ferreira Soares
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
