Innovation and entrepreneurship in the academic environment: a study on entrepreneurial universities and the results of management reports
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i15.37024Keywords:
Federal Universities; Entrepreneurial University; Rankings; Management reports.Abstract
This article aims to analyze information on entrepreneurship and innovation from federal universities (UF), classified as entrepreneurial universities. This being exploratory research, it was sought from a qualitative and quantitative study, based on content analysis, to detect the results of entrepreneurial actions, presented in the management reports made available by universities. For this, we conducted a multiple case study focusing on information and entrepreneurial actions in the academic environment. From the universe of sixty-six federal universities, those that were in the best positions in the Ranking of Entrepreneurial Universities (RUE) 2021, for each geographic region of Brazil, were selected. This analysis made it possible to understand the characteristics of entrepreneurial universities that are transformed to meet the demands of society. The presentation of data and actions relevant to the achievement of results is a direct demonstration of the transformation that is sought in an environment of construction of Entrepreneurial Universities in all regions, being reflected in the perception of students and other stakeholders. As an academic contribution, this study relates the characteristics of entrepreneurial universities and integrates these characteristics into dimensions to understand the strategic objectives for traditional universities to become more entrepreneurial and can serve as a starting point for other empirical studies.
References
Almeida, F. M., Valadares, J. ;., & Sediyama, G. (2017). A contribuição do empreendedorismo para o crescimento econômico dos estados Brasileiros. Revista de Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas, 466–494.
Almeida, A. C. F. de, Lopes, L. F. de O., & Braga, C. B. (2020). Professores Inovadores: mudanças de paradigmas a partir das necessidades apresentadas pelos alunos. Research, Society and Development, 9(7), e576974428. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i7.4428
Aragão, J. D., Braga, F. L. P., & Viana, F. D. F. (2021). Inovação e empreendedorismo: Uma análise lexical a partir de estudos científicos internacionais e nacionais brasileiros (2015-2019). Research, Society and Development, 10(6), e20610615728. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i6.15728
Asheim, B. T., Smith, H. L., & Oughton, C. (2011). Regional innovation systems: Theory, empirics and policy. Regional studies, 45(7), 875-891.
Audy, J. L. (2006). A universidade no Brasil: concepções e modelos / Marilia Morosini, Org. - Brasília: Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira.
Audy, J., & Ferreira, G. C. (2006). Entrepreneurial University: A View From Pucrs. Innovation And Entrepreneurialism in the University.
Bardin, L. (2011). Análise de conteúdo. 1ª ed., São Paulo: Almedina.
Barnard, A., Pittz, T., & Vanevenhoven, J. (2018). Entrepreneurship education in US community colleges: a review and analysis. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development.
Brasil. (2020). Tribunal de Contas da União. Relatório de Gestão: guia para elaboração na forma de relato integrado: evolução da prestação de contas / Tribunal de Contas da União. (3a ed.), TCU, Secretaria de Métodos e Suporte ao Controle Externo (Semec).
Brasil. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil: promulgada em 5 de outubro de 1988, (1988). http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicao.htm
Brasil. Decreto no 9.283, de 7 de fevereiro de 2018. Regulamenta a Lei nº 10.973, de 2 de dezembro de 2004, a Lei nº 13.243, de 11 de janeiro de 2016, o art. 24, § 3º, e o art. 32, § 7º, da Lei nº 8.666, de 21 de junho de 1993, o art. 1º da Lei nº 8.010, de 29 de março de 1990, e o art. 2º, caput, inciso I, alínea "g", da Lei nº 8.032, de 12 de abril de 1990, e altera o Decreto nº 6.759, de 5 de fevereiro de 2009, para estabelecer medidas de incentivo à inovação e à pesquisa científica e tecnológica no ambiente produtivo, com vistas à capacitação tecnológica, ao alcance da autonomia tecnológica e ao desenvolvimento do sistema produtivo nacional e regional.. Diário Oficial da União. Brasília, 8 fev, (2018). https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2018/decreto/d9283.Brasil. Lei 8.443: Dispõe sobre a Lei Orgânica do Tribunal de Contas da União e dá outras providências, (1992). http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l8443.htm
Brasil. Lei 9.394 de 20 de dezembro de 1996. Estabelece as diretrizes e bases da educação nacional, (1996). http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l9394.htm
Brasil Junior, (2021). Ranking de Universidades Empreendedoras 2021: onde os bons negócios nascem. Brasil Junior. https://brasiljunior.org.br/conteudos/ranking-de-universidades-empreendedoras-2021-onde-os-bons-negocios-nascem
Carmo, L. J. O., Assis, L. B. D. E., Gomes Júnior, A. B., & Teixeira, M. B. M. (2021). O empreendedorismo como uma ideologia neoliberal. Cadernos EBAPE BR, 19(1), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395120200043
Clark, B. (1998). The entrepreneurial university: Demand and response. Tertiary Education and Management, 4(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02679392
Clark, B. (2001). The entrepreneurial university: New foundations for collegiality, autonomy, and achievement. Higher Education Management, 129.
Clark, B. (2006). Pursuing the entrepreneurial university. Em Audy, Jorge Luis Nicolas. Morosini, Marília Costa (Org.), Innovation and entrepreneurialism in the university (p. 15–27). Edipucrs.
Clark, B. R. (2003). Sustaining change in universities: Continuities in case studies and concepts. Tertiary Education and Management, 9(2), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2003.9967096
dos Santos, E. G., Maehler, A. E., & de Mello, S. P. T. (2021). A Orientação Empreendedora (OE) na universidade pública: um estudo de caso. Revista Gestão Universitária na América Latina-GUAL, 175-197.
Eckhardt, J. T., & Shane, S. A. (2003). Opportunities and entrepreneurship. Journal of management, 333–349.
Etzkowitz, H. (2001). The second academic revolution and the rise of entrepreneurial science. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 20(2), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1109/44.948843
Etzkowitz, H., & Klofsten, M. (2005). The innovation region: toward a theory of knowledge-based regional development. R & D Management, 35, 243–255.
Etzkowitz, H., & Zhou, C. (2017). The Triple Helix: University-industry-government Innovation and entrepreneurship. Routledge.
Etzkowitz, Henry, Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00069-4
Etzkowitz, Henry. (2003). Innovation in innovation: The Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Social Sciences Information. Information Sur Les Sciences Sociales, 42(3), 293–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184030423002
Etzkowitz, Henry. (2004). The evolution of the entrepreneurial university. International journal of technology and globalisation, 1(1), 64. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtg.2004.004551
Etzkowitz, Henry. (2013). Anatomy of the entrepreneurial university. Social Sciences Information. Information Sur Les Sciences Sociales, 52(3), 486–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018413485832
Fernández-Nogueira, D. (2018). The entrepreneurial university: a selection of good practices. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 3.
Fillion, L. J. (1999). Empreendedorismo: empreendedorismo e proprietários-gerentes de pequenos negócios. Revista de Administração. São Paulo, v, 34(2), 5–28.
Hazelkorn, E. (2019). Rankings acadêmicos e governança universitária no espaço do ensino superior de língua portuguesa. Organizadores: Adolfo Ignacio Calderón.
IIRC. (2013. International Integrated Reporting Council. The International Framework. http://integratedreporting. org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/13-12-08-THEINTERNATIONAL- IR-FRAMEWORK-2-1.pdf.
Isenberg, D. (2011). The Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Strategy as a New Paradigm for Economic Policy: Principles for Cultivating Entrepreneurship. Institute of International and European Affairs, Dublin, Ireland, 12 May 2011, 1-13.
Jiao, H., Zhou, J., Gao, T., & Liu, X. (2016). The more interactions the better? The moderating effect of the interaction between local producers and users of knowledge on the relationship between R&D investment and regional innovation systems. Technological forecasting and social change, 110, 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.03.025
Kirby, D. A., Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2011). Making universities more entrepreneurial: Development of a model: Making universities more entrepreneurial: A model. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne Des Sciences de l Administration, 28(3), 302–316. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.220
Landström, H. (2020). The evolution of entrepreneurship as a scholarly field. Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship, 16(2), 65–243. https://doi.org/10.1561/0300000083
Leite, E. F. (2017). O FENÔMENO DO EMPREENDEDORISMO. Saraiva Educação S.A.
Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of management review, 21(1), 135–127. https://doi.org/10.2307/258632
Mason, C., & Brown, R. (2014). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth oriented entrepreneurship. Final report to OECD, Paris, 30(1). 77–102.
Ribeiro, S. P., Luiz Filho, G., & Silva, D. da . (2022). Avaliação dos atributos do ecossistema empreendedor local. Research, Society and Development, 11(9), e49911930522. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i9.30522
Riviezzo, A., Santos, S. C., Liñán, F., Napolitano, M. R., & Fusco, F. (2018). European universities seeking entrepreneurial paths: the moderating effect of contextual variables on the entrepreneurial orientation-performance relationship. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 141, 232–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.011
Rothaermel, F. T., & Ku, D. N. (2008). Diferenciais da inovação intercluster: o papel das universidades de pesquisa. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.
Ruiz, S. M. D. A. (2018). Universidade empreendedora: proposição de um modelo para as instituições de ensino superior públicas brasileiras.
Ruiz, F. M. (2019). Empreendedorismo. Senac.
Santiago, E. G. (2009). Weber e Mcclelland: novas referências para a sociologia do trabalho. Revista de Ciências Sociais, 40(2), 87–103.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1961). Socialismo e Democracia.
Stensaker, B., & Benner, M. (2013). Doomed to be entrepreneurial: Institutional transformation or institutional lock-ins of ‘new’ universities? Minerva, 51(4), 399–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-013-9238-6
Thiengo L, C., Bianchetti, L., Almeida M, L. P., & De Mari, C. L. (2019). Rankings acadêmicos e as universidades de classe mundial: implicações para a governança transnacional da educação superior. Rankings acadêmicos e governança universitária no espaço do ensino superior de língua portuguesa. Organizadores: Adolfo Ignacio Calderón.
Tornatzky, L. G., & Rideout, E. C. (2014). Innovation U 2.0: Reinventing university roles in a knowledge economy. Innovation-U. com.
Turró, A., Urbano, D., & Peris-Ortiz, M. (2014). Culture and innovation: The moderating effect of cultural values on corporate entrepreneurship. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 88, 360–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.10.004
UFPA. (2022). Relatório de gestão 2021 / Universidade Federal do Pará. — Belém: UFPA.
UFRN. (2022). Relatório de gestão 2021 / Universidade Federal Rio Grande do Norte. — Natal: UFRN.
UFV. (2022). Relatório de gestão 2021 / Universidade Federal de Viçosa. — Viçosa: UFV.
UNB. (2022). Relatório de gestão 2021 / Universidade de Brasília. — Brasília: UnB.
Urbano, D., & Guerrero, M. (2013). Entrepreneurial universities: Socioeconomic impacts of academic entrepreneurship in a European region. Economic development quarterly, 27, 40–55.
UTFPR. (2021). Relatório de gestão 2021 / Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná. — Curitiba: UTFPR, 2022.
Verga, E., & Soares da Silva, L. F. (2015). EMPREENDEDORISMO: EVOLUÇÃO HISTÓRICA, DEFINIÇÕES E ABORDAGENS. REGEPE - Revista de Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas, 3(3), 03. https://doi.org/10.14211/regepe.v3i3.161
Volkmann, C., Wilson, K. E., Mariotti, S., Rabuzzi, D., Vyakarnam, S., & Sepulveda, A. (2009). Education the Next Wave of Entrepreneurs: Unlocking entrepreneurial capabilities to meet the global challenges of the 21st century. A Report of the Global Education Initiative. Switzerland: World Economic Forum.
Voss, C., Tsikriktsis, N., & Frohlich, M. (2002). Case research in operations management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(2), 195–219. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570210414329
Wakkee, I., van der Sijde, P., Vaupell, C., & Ghuman, K. (2018). The university’s role in sustainable development: Activating entrepreneurial scholars as agents of change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 141, 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.013
Yin, R. K. (2015). Estudo de Caso-: Planejamento e métodos. Bookman editora.
Yoshioka-Kobayashi, T. (2019). Institutional factors for academic entrepreneurship in publicly owned universities in japan: Transition from a conservative anti-industry university collaboration culture to a leading entrepreneurial university. Science, Technology & Society, 24(3), 423–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971721819873180
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Elisângela de Menezes Aragão; Vania de Jesus; Mário Jorge Campos dos Santos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.