Teaching methodologies and quality improvement in higher education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i7.3765Keywords:
Hybrid teaching; Problem-based learning; Inverted classroom.Abstract
Social, economic and cultural transformations always imply the need for changes in the educational scenario and, consequently, in the teaching-learning process, especially when these refer to vocational training. The implementation of changes requires adaptation of teaching methodologies that provide the student with understanding, application and improvement of knowledge. In this sense, this article aims to make a brief review on teaching methodologies, their applications and successful experiences in Higher Education. It is a qualitative research, with a bibliographic review on the analyzed theme. It was observed that the experiences with such methodologies are still very punctual, requiring greater dissemination throughout the curriculum. Although successful, these still appear discreetly in the Higher Education.
References
Al‐Zahrani, AM. (2015). From passive to active: The impact of the flipped classroom through social learning platforms on higher education students' creative thinking. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(6), 1133-1148. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12353
Aşıksoy, G, & Özdamlı, F. (2016). Flipped Classroom adapted to the ARCS Model of Motivation and applied to a Physics Course. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(6). doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2016.1251a
Barak, M. (2007). Transition from traditional to ICT-enhanced learning environments in undergraduate chemistry courses. Computers & Education, 48(1), 30-43. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2004.11.004
Barrows, HS. (1996). Problem‐based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview. New directions for teaching and learning, 1996(68), 3-12. doi: 10.1002/tl.37219966804
Beraza, MAZ. (2011). Metodología docente. REDU: Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 9(3), 75.doi: 10.4995/redu.2011.6150
Betihavas, V., Bridgman, H., Kornhaber, R., & Cross, M. (2016). The evidence for ‘flipping out’: A systematic review of the flipped classroom in nursing education. Nurse education today, 38, 15-21.doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.12.010
Bralić, A & Divjak, B. (2018). Integrating MOOCs in traditionally taught courses: achieving learning outcomes with blended learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 2.doi: 10.1186/s41239-017-0085-7
Callahan, BE & Dopico, E. (2016). Science teaching in science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(2), 411-418.. doi: 10.1007/s11422-015-9703-7
Chan, ZC. (2013). A systematic review of critical thinking in nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 33(3): 236-240. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.01.007
Chen, Y, Wang, Y & Chen, NS. (2014). Is FLIP enough? Or should we use the FLIPPED model instead? Computers & Education, 79, 16-27. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.07.004
Collins, JW & O'Brien, NP. (2011). The Greenwood dictionary of education. ABC-CLIO.
Carbogim, FDC., Oliveira, LBD, Mendonça, ÉTD, Marques, DA, Friedrich, DBDC & Püschel, VADA. (2017). Ensino das habilidades do pensamento crítico por meio de problem based learning. Texto & Contexto-Enfermagem, 26(4).doi: 10.1590/0104-07072017001180017
Dahl, B. (2018). What is the problem in problem-based learning in higher education mathematics. European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(1), 112-125.doi: 10.1080/03043797.2017.1320354
Dickson, M & Ladefoged, SE. (2017). Introducing active learning pedagogy into a technical and vocational education and training academy in Kurdistan, Iraq. International Review of Education, 63(5), 679-702. doi: 10.1007/s11159-017-9660-3
Czepula, AIDS, Bottacin, WE, Júnior, EH, Pontarolo, R & Correr, CJ. (2018). Active methodology and blended learning: An experience in pharmaceutical care. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 10(1), 106-111.doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.09.013
Feehily, R. (2018). Problem-based learning and international commercial dispute resolution in the Indian Ocean. The Law Teacher, 52(1), 17-37.doi: 10.1080/03069400.2016.1273457
Flipped classroom field guide. Portal Flipped Classroom Field Guide.(2014). Disponível em: https://tlc.uic.edu/files/2016/02/Flipped-Classroom-Field-Guide.pdf.
Floridi, L. (Ed.). Onlife manifesto: being human in a hyperconnected era. London: Springer, 2015. Disponível em: <http://www.springer.com/us/book/9783319040929>.
Forcael, E, González, V, Orozco, F, Opazo, A, Suazo, Á & Aránguiz, P. (2015). Application of problem-based learning to teaching the critical path method. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 141(3), 04014016.doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000236
Francl, TJ. (2014). Is flipped learning appropriate?. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching, 7(1). Disponível em: https://assets.nu.edu/assets/resources/pageResources/journal-of-research-in-innovative-teaching-volume-7.pdf#page=128.
Freire, P. (1981) Pedagogia do Oprimido. 9. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.
Georgina, DA & Olson, MR. (2008). Integration of technology in higher education: A review of faculty self-perceptions. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(1), 1-8.doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.11.002
Gomes, R, Brino, RDF, Aquilante, AG & Avó, LRDSD. (2009). Aprendizagem Baseada em Problemas na formação médica e o currículo tradicional de Medicina: uma revisão bibliográfica. Revista brasileira de educação médica, 33(3), 433-40. doi: 10.1590/S0100-55022009000300014
Hemker, L, Prescher, C & Narciss, S. (2017). Design and Evaluation of a Problem-Based Learning Environment for Teacher Training. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 11(2), 10.Disponível em: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1676&context=ijpbl.
Howard, SW, Scharff, DP & Loux, TM. (2017). Flipping classrooms in a School of Public Health. Frontiers in public health, 5, 73. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00073
Hu, R, Gao, H, Ye, Y, Ni, Z, Jiang, N & Jiang, X. (2018). Effectiveness of flipped classrooms in Chinese baccalaureate nursing education: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. International Journal of nursing studies, 79, 94-103.doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.11.01
Lage, MJ, Platt, GJ & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30-43.doi: 10.2307/1183338
Lo, CK, Hew, KF & Chen, G. (2017). Toward a set of design principles for mathematics flipped classrooms: A synthesis of research in mathematics education. Educational Research Review, 22, 50-73. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.002
Lopes, AP & Soares, F. (2018). Perception and performance in a flipped Financial Mathematics classroom. The International Journal of Management Education, 16(1), 105-113.doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2018.01.001
Masetto, MT. (2012). Competência pedagógica do professor universitário. Summus editorial. Disponível em: http://www.ucs.br/etc/revistas/index.php/conjectura/article/view/1267/891.
McLaughlin, JE, White, PJ, Khanova, J & Yuriev, E. (2016). Flipped classroom implementation: a case report of two higher education institutions in the United States and Australia. Computers in the Schools, 33(1), 24-37.doi: 10.1080/07380569.2016.1137734
Mello, CDCB, Alves, RO & Lemos, SMA. (2014). Methods of health education and training: literature review. Revista CEFAC, 16(6).doi: doi.org/10.1590/1982-0216201416012
Mercado, LPL. (2016). Metodologias de ensino com tecnologias da informação e comunicação no ensino jurídico. Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior, 21(1), 263-99. doi: 10.1590/S1414-40772016000100013
Cotta, RMM, Costa, GDD & Mendonça, ETD. (2015). Portfólios crítico-reflexivos: uma proposta pedagógica centrada nas competências cognitivas e metacognitivas. Interface-Comunicação, Saúde, Educação, 19, 573-588. doi: 10.1590/1807-57622014.0399.
Pavanelo, E & Lima, R. (2017). Sala de Aula Invertida: a análise de uma experiência na disciplina de Cálculo I. Bolema: Boletim de Educação Matemática, 31(58), 739-759. doi: 10.1590/1980-4415v31n58a11.
Pereira, AS et al. (2018). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. [e-book]. Santa Maria. Ed. UAB/NTE/UFSM. Acesso em: 16 maio 2020. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/handle/1/15824/Lic_Computacao_Metodologia-Pesquisa-Cientifica.pdf?sequence=1.
Porcaro, PA, Jackson, DE, McLaughlin, PM & O’Malley, CJ. (2016). Curriculum design of a flipped classroom to enhance haematology learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(3), 345-357.doi: 10.1007/s10956-015-9599-8
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of engineering education, 93(3), 223-231.Disponível em: https://www.engr.ncsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/drive/1smSpn4AiHSh8z7a0MHDBwhb_JhcoLQmI/2004-Prince_AL.pdf.
Roca, J, Reguant, M & Canet, O. (2016). Learning outcomes of “The Oncology Patient” study among nursing students: A comparison of teaching strategies. Nurse education today, 46, 29-35.doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.08.018
Rossano, S, Meerman, A, Kesting, T & Baaken, T. (2016). The Relevance of Problem‐based Learning for Policy Development in University‐Business Cooperation. European Journal of Education, 51(1), 40-55.doi: 10.1111/ejed.12165
Santaella, L. (2014). A aprendizagem ubíqua na educação aberta. Revista Tempos e Espaços em Educação, 15-22. doi: 10.20952/revtee.v0i0.3446
Şengel, E. (2016). To FLIP or not to FLIP: Comparative case study in higher education in Turkey. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 547-555. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.034
Staker, H & Horn, MB. Classifying K–12 blended learning. Mountain View, CA: Innosight Institute, Inc. (2012). Disponível em: <http://www.christenseninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Classifying-K-12-blended-learning.pdf>.
Stentoft, D. (2017). From saying to doing interdisciplinary learning: Is problem-based learning the answer?. Active Learning in Higher Education, 18(1), 51-61.doi: 10.1177/1469787417693510
Tabari, R. (2014). Education reform in the UAE: An investigation of teachers’ views of change and factors impeding reforms in Ras Al Khaimah schools. Ras Al Khaima, UAE. doi: 10.18502/aqf.0112
Thai, NTT, Wever, B & Valcke, M. (2017). The impact of a flipped classroom design on learning performance in higher education: Looking for the best “blend” of lectures and guiding questions with feedback. Computers & Education, 107, 113-126.doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.003
Valente, JA. (2014). Blended learning e as mudanças no ensino superior: a proposta da sala de aula invertida. Educar em Revista, (4), 79-97. doi: 10.1590/0104-4060.38645.
Valente, JA, Almeida, MEB & Geraldini, AFS. (2017). Metodologias ativas: das concepções às práticas em distintos níveis de ensino. Revista Diálogo Educacional, 17(52), 455-478. doi: 10.7213/1981-416X.17.052.DS07
Wichadee, S. (2015). Factors related to students' performance of hybrid learning in an English language course. In Curriculum Design and Classroom Management: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 225-241). IGI Global.
Yusoff, S, Yusoff, R & Md Noh, NH. (2017). Blended learning approach for less proficient students. SAGE Open, 7(3), 2158244017723051. doi: 10.1177/2158244017723051.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
