The use of short implants for rehabilitation of atrophic mandible: literature review

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i15.37714

Keywords:

Dental implants; Mandible atrophy; Short implants.

Abstract

Short implants are an excellent alternative for the treatment of atrophic alveolar ridges. The advantages, compared to other techniques proposed for rehabilitation through posterior mandible implants, include the reduction of morbidity, treatment time and costs. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the importance of using short implants for the rehabilitation of atrophic mandibles, in order to provide support for the current literature. It is a Literature Literature Review, narrative type, developed through bibliographic analysis in the databases: PubMed/Medline, Scielo, Academic Google, VHL (Virtual Health Library). After applying the search strategy in the databases and the eligibility criteria, 24 articles were included in this study. Based on the consulted literature, it was observed that short implants have similar success rates to long implants. In addition, the use of short implants favors benefits, eliminating bone graft surgeries in atrophic areas. However, the use of reduced size implants may be contraindicated in patients with local or systemic diseases. In this sense, when the use of short implants is recommended, a correct surgical protocol must be carried out to ensure a better longevity to the proposed treatment.

References

Araújo, M. G. (2016). Bio-Osss Collagen in the buccal gap AP immediate implants: a 6-month study in the dog. Clin. Oral Implant Res, 22, 1-8. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01920.x.

Arab, H. (2016). Comparison of Two Regenerative Surgical Treatments for Peri-Implantitis Defect using NatixAlone or in Combination with Bio-Oss and Collagen Membrane. Journal of Long- Term Effects of Medical Implants, 26, 199-204. https://doi.org/ 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2016016396.

Barbosa, J. R. (2012). Implantes curtos: uma opção para regiões atróficas e fatores que influenciam os seus índices de sucesso. Revista Implant news, 9, 86-92.

Ferreira, L. C. P. (2010). Avaliação de implantes osseointegráveis submetidos à função imediata comparados à função tardia. Revista Implant news, 7, 13-20.

Galvão, F. F. S. A. (2011). Predictability of short dental implants: a literature review. RSBO, 8, 1-10.

Kassebaum, N. J. (2014). Global burden of severe tooth loss: a systematic review and meta- analysis. J Dent Res, 93, 20-28. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0022034514537828.

Kim, J. (2011). Biomechanical comparison of axial and tilted implants for mandibular full-arch fixed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 26, 976-984.

Ladewig, V.M. (2011). Implantes dentários imediatos e em carga imediata. Revista Implant news, 8, 839-844.

Lopes, A. C. (2010). Infiltração bacteriana na interface implante/pilar: considerações ao implantodontista. Rev. Gaúcha. Odontológica, 58, 10.

Lopes, D. (2018). Bone physiology as inspiration for tissue regenerative therapies. Biomaterials, 185, 240-275. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.09.028.

Maia, L.C. (2020). Edentulismo total em idosos: envelhecimento ou desigualdade social?. Rev. Bioét, 28,173- 181.

Manfro, R. (2015). Mandíbulas Edêntulas severamente reabsorvidas tratadas com implantes curtos–apresentação de 4 casos clínicos e controle de 30 a 36 meses. Journal of Oral Investigations, 2, 10-16.

Marx, R. E. (2007). Bone and bone graft healing. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am, 19, 455-466. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.coms.2007.07.008.

Oliveira, M. M. S. (2020). Aspectos psicossociais relacionados ao paciente desdentado: Uma revisão da literatura. Revista Eletrônica Acervo Odontológico, 1, e2477.

Primo, B. T. (2011). Implante imediato para substituição de elemento dentário com fratura radicular: relato de caso clínico. Stomatos, 17, 65-71.

Rotenberg, S. A. (2016). Collagen-Coated Bovine Bone in Peri- implantitis Defects: A Pilot Study on a Novel Approach. The International Journal of Oral & amp; Maxillofacial Implants, 31, 701-707. https://doi.org/ 10.11607/jomi.4303.

Ruffoni, D. (2015). In vivo monitoring of bone architecture and remodeling after implant insertion: The different responses of cortical and trabecular bone. Bone, 81, 468-477. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.bone.2015.08.017.

Rungsiyakull, C. (2015). Bone responses to different designs of implant-supported fixed partial dentures. Biomech Model Mechanobiol, 14, 403-411. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10237-014-0612-6.

Silva, F. L. (2016). Tratamento de superfície em implantes dentários: uma revisão de literatura. RFO UPF, 21, 10.

Silveira-Júnior, C. D. (2011). Estudo clínico prospectivo utilizando implantes curtos unitários posteriores. Ribeirão Preto. Tese de Doutorado. Universidade de São Paulo, 10.

Thomé, G. (2011). Instalação imediata de implantes na região estética da maxila após extração dentária. Jornal ILAPEO, 5, 105 -110.

Zani, S. R. (2011). Colocação de implante imediato após exodontia: relato de caso clínico. Odontol. Clin -Cient, 10, 281-284.

Published

26/11/2022

How to Cite

COSTA, A. B. S. da .; PAIVA, J. L. de .; LUCENA, T. de A. .; BARBOSA, M. E. S. .; PEREIRA, T. B. F. .; DUARTE, T. V. de A. .; FELIPE JUNIOR , J. .; ALMEIDA , D. R. de M. F. .; LIMA, J. G. da C. .; PINHEIRO, J. C. The use of short implants for rehabilitation of atrophic mandible: literature review. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 11, n. 15, p. e559111537714, 2022. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v11i15.37714. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/37714. Acesso em: 31 jan. 2023.

Issue

Section

Review Article