Selection indices to identify drought-tolerant soybean cultivars
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i7.3812Keywords:
Water restriction; Abiotic stress; Drought tolerance indices.Abstract
The occurrence of water restriction is one of the environmental stresses that most limit soybean grain yield. Studies that seek to identify soybean cultivars with greater drought tolerance are important for agricultural production. This study was carried out with the purpose of evaluating the response of 22 soybean cultivars grown under adverse environmental conditions (irrigated and rainfed system), aiming to determine the best selection indexes to identify drought-tolerant soybean cultivars. Two experiments were carried out under field conditions in the municipality of Cassilândia (MS) during the 2018/2019 growing season, one in rainfed conditions with water restriction and the other in an irrigation system with central pivot. A randomized block design was used, in a 2 × 22 factorial scheme with three replications. The treatments consisted of two cultivation conditions (irrigated and rainfed system) and 22 soybean cultivars. From the data of grain yield in irrigated and rainfed systems, 12 drought tolerance indexes were estimated. The identification of soybean cultivars tolerant and/or susceptible to water restriction was carried out using different multivariate analysis methods (ranking method, hierarchical cluster analysis and principal component analysis). The 98R35 IRPO, RK 8317 IPRO and RK 8115 IPRO cultivars were classified as having greater drought tolerance, and are therefore the most suitable cultivars to be cultivated in Cerrado regions with water restriction. On the other hand, the TMG 7067 IPRO, M 5917 IPR, RK 6719 IPRO cultivars were classified as more susceptible to water restriction, and should not be recommended for cultivation in the region of Cassilândia (MS) under rainfed conditions in season with high probability occurrence of water deficiency. The indices of tolerance MP, STI, GMP and HM were the most indicated to identify soybean cultivars with greater tolerance to drought and with high grain yield potential in irrigated and rainfed systems in the region of Cassilândia, State of Mato Grosso do Sul.
References
Akçura, M, Partigo, F & Kaya, Y. (2011). Evaluating of drought stress tolerance based on selection indices in Turkish bread wheat landraces. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 21(8), 700-709.
Bahrami-Radb & S, Hajiboland, R. (2017). Effect of potassium application in drought-stressed tobacco (Nicotiana rustica L.) plants: Comparison of root with foliar application. Annals of Agricultural Sciences, 62(2), p. 121-130.
Basu, S, Ramegowda, V, Kumar, A & Pereira, A. (2016). Plant adaptation to drought stress. F1000 Research, 5(1): e1554.
Blum, A. (1988). Plant breeding for stress environments. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
Bouslama, M.; Schapaugh, W.T. (1984). Stress tolerance in soybean. Part 1: evaluation of three screening techniques for heat and drought tolerance. Crop Science, 24(9), 933-937.
Catuchi, TA, Guidorizzi, FVC, Guidorizi, KA, Barbosa, AM & Souza, G.M. (2012) Respostas fisiológicas de cultivares de soja à adubação potássica sob diferentes regimes hídricos. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 47(4), 519-527.
Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento – Conab. (2020). Acompanhamento da Safra Brasileira Grãos: Safra 2019/2020, Brasília: Conab.
Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento – Conab. (2019). Levantamento da safra 2018/2019: grãos. Brasília: Conab.
Dickie, A, Magno, I, Giampietro, J & Dolginow, A. (2016). Challenges and opportunities for conservation, agricultural production, and social inclusion in the Cerrado biome. California Environmental Associates (CEA): San Francisco, CA-USA. 51p.
El-Rawy, MA & Hassan, MI. (2014). Effectiveness of drought tolerance indices to identify tolerant genotypes in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology, 17(4), 255-266.
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária – Embrapa. (2011). Tecnologias de produção de soja: região central do Brasil. Londrina: Embrapa Soja.
Farshadfar, E, Poursiahbidi, MM & Abooghadareh, A.R.P. (2012). Repeatability of drought tolerance indices in bread wheat genotypes. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences, 4(13), 891-903.
Farshadfar, E, Mohammadi, R, Farshadfar, M & Dabiri, S. (2013). Relationships and repeatability of drought tolerance indices in wheat-rye disomic addition lines. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 7(2), 130-198.
Farshadfar, E & Sutka, J. (2002). Multivariate analysis of drought tolerance in wheat substitution lines. Cereal Research Communications, 31(1), 33-39.
Fernandez, GCJ. (1992). Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Adaptation of Vegetables and other Food Crops in Temperature and Water Stress, Taiwan, p.257-270.
Ferreira, D.F. (2014). Sisvar: a Guide for its Bootstrap procedures in multiple comparisons. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, 38(2),109-112 .
Fioreze, SL, Pivetta, LA, Fano, A, Machado, FR & Guimarães, VF. (2011). Comportamento de genótipos de soja submetidos a déficit hídrico intenso em casa de vegetação. Revista Ceres, 58(6), 342-349.
Gavuzzi, P, Rizza, F, Palumbo, M, Campaline, RG, Ricciardi, GL & Borghi, B. (1997). Evaluation of field and laboratory predictors of drought and heat tolerance in winter cereals. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 77(4), 523-531.
Gholinezhad, E, Darvishzadeh, R & Bernousi, I. (2014). Evaluation of drought tolerance indices for selection of confectionery sunflower (Helianthus anuus L.) landraces under various environmental conditions. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 42(3), 187-201.
Jafari, A, Paknejad, F & Jami Al-Ahmadi, M. (2009). Evaluation of selection indices for drought tolerance of corn (Zea mays L.) hybrids. International Journal of Plant Production, 3(4):33-38, 2009.
Kron, AP, Souza, GM & Ribeiro, RV. (2008). Water deficiency at different developmental stages of Glycine max can improve drought tolerance. Bragantia, 67(1), 43-49.
Mantovani, D, Veste, M, Boldt-Burisch, K, Fritsch, S., Koning, LA & Freese, D. (2015). Carbon allocation, nodulation, and biological nitrogen fixation of black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) under soil water limitation. Annals Forestry Science, 58(2), 259-274.
Menezes, CB, Ticona-Benavente, CA, Tardin, FD, Cardoso, MJ, Bastos, EA, Nogueira, DW, Portugal, AF, Santos, CV & Schaffert, RE. (2014). Selection indices to identify drought-tolerant grain sorghum cultivars. Genetics and Molecular Research, 13(4), 9817-9827.
Mertz-Henning, LM, Ferreira, LC, Henning, FA, Mandarino, JMG, Santos, ED, Oliveira, MCND, Nepomuceno, AEL, Farias, JRB & Neumaier, N. (2018). Effect of water deficit-induced at vegetative and reproductive stages on protein and oil content in soybean grains. Agronomy, 8(1), 1-11.
Mohammadi, R, Armion, M, Kahrizi, D & Amri, A. (2010). Efficiency of screening techniques for evaluating durum wheat genotypes under mild drought conditions. International Journal of Plant Production, 4(1), 11-24.
Moosavi, SS, Samadi, BY, Naghavi, MR, Zali, AA, Dashti,H & Pourshahbazi, A. (2008). Introduction of new indices to identify relative drought tolerance and resistance in wheat genotypes. Desert, 12(4), 165-178.
Naghavi, MR, Pour-Aboughadareh, A & Khalili, M. (2013). Evaluation of drought tolerance indices for screening some of corn (Zea mays L.) cultivars under environmental conditions. Notulae Scientia Biologicae, 5(3), 388-393.
Pereira, AS et al. (2018). Methodology of cientific research. [e-Book]. Santa Maria City. UAB / NTE / UFSM Editors. Accessed on: May, 9th, 2020.Available at: https://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/handle/1/15824/Lic_Computacao_Metodologia-Pesquisa-Cientifica.pdf?sequence=1.
Rosielle, AA & Hamblin, J. (1981). Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environments. Crop Science, 21(8), 943-946.
Sánchez-Reinoso, AD, Ligarreto-Moreno, GA & Restrepo-Díaz, H. (2020). Evaluation of drought indices to identify tolerant genotypes in common bean bush (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 19(1), 99-107.
Silva, ER, Zoz, J, Oliveira, CES, Zuffo, AM, Steiner, F, Zoz, T & Vendruscolo, EP. (2019). Can co-inoculation of Bradyrhizobium and Azospirillum alleviate adverse effects of drought stress on soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill.)? Archives of Microbiology, 201(3),325–335.
Vieira, EA, Silva, MG, Moro, CF & Laura, VA. (2017). Physiological and biochemical changes attenuate the effects of drought on the Cerrado species Vatairea macrocarpa (Benth.) Ducke. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 115(4),472-483.
Zoz, T, Steiner, F, Guimarães, VF, Castagnara, DD, Meinerz, CC, Fey, R. (2013). Peroxidase activity as an indicator of water deficit tolerance in soybean cultivars. Bioscience Journal, 29(6), 1664-1671.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.